The subthalamic nucleus contributes to post-error slowing

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2637-2644

  Cavanagh, James F ^a,b   Sanguinetti, Joseph L ^c   Allen, John J B ^c   Sherman, Scott J ^c   Frank, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PARKINSON DISEASE; POST ERROR SLOWING; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; CONFLICT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARKINSON DISEASE; REACTION TIME; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS;

EID: 84907462539     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00659     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alegre, M., Lopez-Azcarate, J., Obeso, I., Wilkinson, L., Rodriguez-Oroz, M. C., Valencia, M., et al. (2013). The subthalamic nucleus is involved in successful inhibition in the stop-signal task: A local field potential study in Parkinson's disease. Experimental Neurology, 239, 1-12.
2. Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990). Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: Neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 13, 266-271.
3. Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2011). How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval. BMJ, 343, d2304.
4. Androulidakis, A. G., Kühn, A. A., Chen, C. C., Blomstedt, P., Kempf, F., Kupsch, A., et al. (2007). Dopaminergic therapy promotes lateralized motor activity in the subthalamic area in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 130, 457-468.
5. Aron, A. R., Behrens, T. E., Smith, S., Frank, M. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3743-3752.
6. Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2424-2433.
7. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
8. Brittain, J.-S., Watkins, K. E., Joundi, R. A., Ray, N. J., Holland, P., Green, A. L., et al. (2012). A role for the subthalamic nucleus in response inhibition during conflict. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 13396-13401.
9. Buckley, M. J., Mansouri, F. A., Hoda, H., Mahboubi, M., Browning, P. G. F., Kwok, S. C., et al. (2009). Dissociable components of rule-guided behavior depend on distinct medial and prefrontal regions. Science, 325, 52-58.
10. Canolty, R. T., Edwards, E., Dalal, S. S., Soltani, M., Nagarajan, S. S., Kirsch, H. E., et al. (2006). High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science, 313, 1626-1628.
11. Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
12. Cavanagh, J. F., Cohen, M. X., & Allen, J. J. B. (2009). Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 98-105.
13. Cavanagh, J. F., Wiecki, T. V., Cohen, M. X., Figueroa, C. M., Samanta, J., Sherman, S. J., et al. (2011). Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1462-1467.
14. Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano-Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012). Theta lingua franca: A common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. Psychophysiology, 49, 220-238.
15. Cohen, M. X., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2011). Single-trial regression elucidates the role of prefrontal theta oscillations in response conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 30.
16. Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11730-11737.
17. Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 454-465.
18. Forstmann, B. U., Keuken, M. C., Jahfari, S., Bazin, P.-L., Neumann, J., Schäfer, A., et al. (2012). Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response. Neuroimage, 60, 370-375.
19. Frank, M. J. (2006). Hold your horses: A dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making. Neural Networks, 19, 1120-1136.
20. Frank, M. J., Samanta, J., Moustafa, A. A., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). Hold your horses: Impulsivity, deep brain stimulation, and medication in parkinsonism. Science, 318, 1309-1312.
21. Gehring, W. J., & Fencsik, D. E. (2001). Functions of the medial frontal cortex in the processing of conflict and errors. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 9430-9437.
22. Gehring, W. J., Liu, Y., Orr, J. M., & Carp, J. (2012). The error-related negativity (ERN/Ne). In S. J. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 231-291). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Haynes, W. I. A., & Haber, S. N. (2013). The organization of prefrontal-subthalamic inputs in primates provides an anatomical substrate for both functional specificity and integration: Implications for basal ganglia models and deep brain stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 4804-4814.
24. Isoda, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2008). Role for subthalamic nucleus neurons in switching from automatic to controlled eye movement. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 7209-7218.
25. Jenkinson, N., & Brown, P. (2011). New insights into the relationship between dopamine, beta oscillations and motor function. Trends in Neurosciences, 34, 611-618.
26. Kühn, A. A., Williams, D., Kupsch, A., Limousin, P., Hariz, M., Schneider, G.-H., et al. (2004). Event-related beta desynchronization in human subthalamic nucleus correlates with motor performance. Brain, 127, 735-746.
27. Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 194-208.
28. Laming, D. R. J. (1979). Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. Acta Psychologica, 43, 381-412.
29. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Mansfield, E. L., Karayanidis, F., Jamadar, S., Heathcote, A., & Forstmann, B. U. (2011). Adjustments of response threshold during task switching: A model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 14688-14692.
31. Marceglia, S., Fumagalli, M., & Priori, A. (2011). What neurophysiological recordings tell us about cognitive and behavioral functions of the human subthalamic nucleus. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 11, 139-149.
32. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
33. Mink, J. W. (1996). The basal ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in Neurobiology, 50, 381-425.
34. Nambu, A., Tokuno, H., & Hamada, I. (2000). Excitatory cortical inputs to pallidal neurons via the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 289-300.
35. Nambu, A., Tokuno, H., & Takada, M. (2002). Functional significance of the cortico-subthalamo-pallidal "hyperdirect" pathway. Neuroscience Research, 43, 111-117.
36. Rabbit, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choiceresponse tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
37. Ratcliff, R., & Frank, M. J. (2012). Reinforcement-based decision making in corticostriatal circuits: Mutual constraints by neurocomputational and diffusion models. Neural Computation, 24, 1186-1229.
38. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873-922.
39. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443-447.
40. Rushworth, M. F. S., Noonan, M. P., Boorman, E. D., Walton, M. E., & Behrens, T. E. (2011). Frontal cortex and rewardguided learning and decision-making. Neuron, 70, 1054-1069.
41. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
42. Weinberger, M., Mahant, N., Hutchison, W. D., Lozano, A. M., Moro, E., Hodaie, M., et al. (2006). Beta oscillatory activity in the subthalamic nucleus and its relation to dopaminergic response in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 3248-3256.
43. Wiecki, T. V., & Frank, M. J. (2013). A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia. Psychological Review, 120, 329-355.
44. Wylie, S. A., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Elias, W. J., Frysinger, R. C., Bashore, T. R., Downs, K. E., et al. (2010). Subthalamic nucleus stimulation influences expression and suppression of impulsive behaviour in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 133, 3611-3624.
45. Zaghloul, K. A., Weidemann, C. T., Lega, B. C., Jaggi, J. L., Baltuch, G. H., & Kahana, M. J. (2012). Neuronal activity in the human subthalamic nucleus encodes decision conflict during action selection. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2453-2460.
46. Zavala, B., Brittain, J.-S., Jenkinson, N., Ashkan, K., Foltynie, T., Limousin, P., et al. (2013). Subthalamic nucleus local field potential activity during the Eriksen flanker task reveals a novel role for theta phase during conflict monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 14758-14766.