Testing theories of post-error slowing

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 454-465

  Dutilh, Gilles ^a   Vandekerckhove, Joachim ^b   Forstmann, Birte U ^a   Keuleers, Emmanuel ^c   Brysbaert, Marc ^c   Wagenmakers, Eric Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cognitive control and automaticity; Diffusion model decomposition; Lexical decision; Response caution; Response time distributions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CONTROL; DECISION MAKING; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REACTION TIME; RISK-TAKING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84857597021     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0243-2     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 108. 3. 624.
3. Brewer, N., & Smith, G. A. (1989). Developmental changes in processing speed: Influence of speed-accuracy regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 298-310. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 118. 3. 298.
4. Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice reaction time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153-178. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogpsych. 2007. 12. 002.
5. Cohen, J. D., Botvinick, M., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: Who's in control? Nature Neuroscience, 3, 421-423. doi: 10. 1038/74783.
6. Danielmeier, C., Eichele, T., Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., & Ullsperger, M. (2011). Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1780-1789. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4299-10. 2011.
7. de Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 4. 731.
8. Diederich, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2006). Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: Bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 194-207. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193669.
9. Dutilh, G., Krypotos, A.-M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Task-related vs. stimulus-specific practice: A diffusion model account. Experimental Psychology. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169/a000111.
10. Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1026-1036. doi: 10. 3758/16. 6. 1026.
11. Edwards, W. (1965). Optimal strategies for seeking information: Models for statistics, choice reaction times, and human information processing. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 312-329. doi: 10. 1016/0022-2496(65)90007-6.
12. Fitts, P. M. (1966). Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 849-857. doi: 10. 1037/h0023232.
13. Forstmann, B. U., Dutilh, G., Brown, S. D., Neumann, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 17538-17542. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0805903105.
14. Geddes, J., Ratcliff, R., Allerhand, M., Childers, R., Wright, R. J., Frier, B. M., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Modeling the effects of hypoglycemia on a two-choice task in adult humans. Neuropsychology, 24, 652-660. doi: 10. 1037/a0020074.
15. Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Banburismus and the brain: Decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron, 36, 299-308.
16. Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535-574. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. neuro. 29. 051605. 113038.
17. Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003). To err is autonomic: Error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. Psychophysiology, 40, 895-903. doi: 10. 1111/1469-8986. 00107.
18. Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 627-633. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 42. 3. 627.
19. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 643-650. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 42. 3. 643.
20. Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14, 000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 174. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2010. 00174.
21. Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353-368. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 93. 3. 353.
22. Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice-reaction times. London, U. K.: Academic Press.
23. Laming, D. (1979a). Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. Acta Psychologica, 43, 381-412. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(79)90032-5.
24. Laming, D. (1979b). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199-224. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(79)90026-X.
25. Li, R. C., Huang, C., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R. (2006). Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: Neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 186-192. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 3741-05. 2006.
26. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
27. Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111, 275-279. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2009. 02. 002.
28. Petrov, A. A., Horn, N. M., & Ratcliff, R. (2011). Dissociable perceptual-learning mechanisms revealed by diffusion-model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 490-497. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-011-0079-8.
29. Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2013-2025. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 7. 2013.
30. Rabbitt, P. (1966). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
31. Rabbitt, P. (1979). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 305-311.
32. Rabbitt, P., & Rodgers, B. (1977). What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 727-743. doi: 10. 1080/14640747708400645.
33. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (pp. 111-196). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
34. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 85. 2. 59.
35. Ratcliff, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 278-291. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196283.
36. Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 111. 1. 159.
37. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873-922. doi: 10. 1162/neco. 2008. 12-06-420.
38. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00067.
39. Ratcliff, R., Schmiedek, F., & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model explanation of the worst performance rule for reaction time and IQ. Intelligence, 36, 10-17. doi: 10. 1016/j. intell. 2006. 12. 002.
40. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology and Aging, 16, 323-341. doi: 10. 1037/0882-7974. 16. 2. 323.
41. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2006). Aging, practice, and perceptual tasks: A diffusion model analysis. Psychology and Aging, 21, 353-371. doi: 10. 1037/0882-7974. 21. 2. 353.
42. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2010). Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 127-157. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogpsych. 2009. 09. 001.
43. Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438-481. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196302.
44. Ratcliff, R., & van Dongen, H. P. A. (2009). Sleep deprivation affects multiple distinct cognitive processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 742-751. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 16. 4. 742.
45. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 16. 2. 225.
46. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414-429. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 136. 3. 414.
47. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
48. Shiels, K., & Hawk, L. W., Jr. (2010). Self-regulation in ADHD: The role of error processing. Clinical Psychology Review, 951-961. doi: 10. 1016/j. cpr. 2010. 06. 010.
49. Smith, G. A., & Brewer, N. (1995). Slowness and age: Speed-accuracy mechanisms. Psychology and Aging, 10, 238-247. doi: 10. 1037/0882-7974. 10. 2. 238.
50. Speckman, P. L., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Pratte, M. S. (2008). Delta plots and coherent distribution ordering. American Statistician, 62, 262-266. doi: 10. 1198/000313008X333493.
51. Tops, M., & Boksem, M. A. S. (2011). Cortisol involvement in mechanisms of behavioral inhibition. Psychophysiology, 48, 723-732. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2010. 01131. x.
52. Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2007). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1011-1026. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193087.
53. Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2008). Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: A DMAT primer. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 61-72. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 40. 1. 61.
54. van Ravenzwaaij, D., Brown, S., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). An integrated perspective on the relation between response speed and intelligence. Cognition, 119, 381-393. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2011. 02. 002.
55. van Ravenzwaaij, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Does the name-race Implicit Association Test measure racial prejudice? Experimental Psychology, 58, 271-277. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169/a000093.
56. Verguts, T., Notebaert, W., Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2011). Post-conflict slowing: Cognitive adaptation after conflict processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 76-82. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-010-0016-2.
57. Vickers, D., & Lee, M. D. (1998). Dynamic models of simple judgments: I. Properties of a self-regulating accumulator module. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2, 169-194. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1022371901259.
58. Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1206-1220. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196893.
59. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 641-671. doi: 10. 1080/09541440802205067.
60. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 140-159. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2007. 04. 006.
61. Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 3-22. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194023.
62. Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2005). Catastrophe theory. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 234-239). Chichester, U. K.: Wiley.
63. Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291-298. doi: 10. 1177/1745691611406923.
64. Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 752-760. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 16. 4. 752.
65. White, C., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M., & McKoon, G. (2009). Dysphoria and memory for emotional material: A diffusion-model analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 181-205. doi: 10. 1080/02699930801976770.
66. White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M. W., & McKoon, G. (2010a). Anxiety enhances threat processing without competition among multiple inputs: A diffusion model analysis. Emotion, 10, 662-677. doi: 10. 1037/a0019474.
67. White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M. W., & McKoon, G. (2010b). Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 39-52. doi: 10. 1016/j. jmp. 2010. 01. 004.