Neural sensitivity to social deviance predicts attentive processing of peer-group judgment

Social Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 650-660

  Schnuerch, Robert ^a   Trautmann Lengsfeld, Sina Alexa ^b   Bertram, Mario ^a   Gibbons, Henning ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conflict; FRN; pMFC; Social deviance; Social norms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PEER GROUP; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PEER GROUP; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84907405373     PISSN: 17470919     EISSN: 17470927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2014.934393     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S., & Noussair, C. (2010). Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music. Neuroimage, 49, 2687–2696. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.070
2. Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Bach, D. R., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2010). How the opinion of others affects our valuation of objects. Current Biology, 20, 1165–1170. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055
3. Carver, C. S. (1977). Self-awareness, perception of threat, and the expression of reactance through attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 501–512. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00167.x
4. Chen, J., Wu, Y., Tong, G., Guan, X., & Zhou, X. (2012). ERP correlates of social conformity in a line judgment task. BMC Neuroscience, 13, 43. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-43
5. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
6. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
7. Deuker, L., Müller, A. R., Montag, C., Markett, S., Reuter, M., Fell, J., … Axmacher, N. (2013). Playing nice: A multi-methodological study on the effects of social conformity on memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 79. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00079
8. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357–374. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00058027
9. Fishman, I., Ng, R., & Bellugi, U. (2011). Do extraverts process social stimuli differently from introverts? Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 67–73. doi:10.1080/17588928.2010.527434
10. Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295, 2279–2282. doi:10.1126/science.1066893
11. Gibbons, H. (2009). Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: Insights from event-related potentials and individual differences related to anxiety. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 383–400. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.007
12. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
13. Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., & Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 216–224. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00092-1
14. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
15. Hashimoto, Y., Minami, T., & Nakauchi, S. (2012). Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affect misattribution. Plos ONE, 7(11), e49132. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049132
16. Hoerger, M. (2013). ZH: An updated version of Steiger’s Z and web-based calculator for testing the statistical significance of the difference between dependent correlations. Retrieved from http://www.psychmike.com/dependent_correlations.php
17. Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287–305. doi:10.1108/eb022799
18. Kim, B.-R., Liss, A., Rao, M., Singer, Z., & Compton, R. J. (2012). Social deviance activates the brain’s error-monitoring system. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 65–73. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0067-5
19. Kimura, K., & Katayama, J. (2013). Outcome evaluations in group decision making using the majority rule: An electrophysiological study. Psychophysiology, 50, 848–857. doi:10.1111/psyp.12068
20. Klucharev, V., Hytönen, K., Rijpkema, M., Smidts, A., & Fernández, G. (2009). Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron, 61, 140–151. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.027
21. Klucharev, V., Munneke, M. A. M., Smidts, A., & Fernandez, G. (2011). Downregulation of the posterior medial frontal cortex prevents social conformity. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 11934–11940. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1869-11.2011
22. Kolassa, I. T., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2006). Psychophysiological correlates of face processing in social phobia. Brain Research, 1118, 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.019
23. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-8). Gainesville: University of Florida.
24. Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces – KDEF [CD]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section. ISBN 91-630-7164-9.
25. Mcguire, W. J. (1976). Some internal psychological factors influencing consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 302–319. doi:10.1086/208643
26. Miltner, W. H., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788–798.
27. Moran, J. M., Heatherton, T. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2009). Modulation of cortical midline structures by implicit and explicit self-relevance evaluation. Social Neuroscience, 4, 197–211. doi:10.1080/17470910802250519
28. Mueller, E. M., Hofmann, S. G., Santesso, D. L., Meuret, A. E., Bitran, S., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence of attentional biases in social anxiety disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1141–1152. doi:10.1017/S0033291708004820
29. Nash, A. J., & Fernandez, M. (1996). P300 and allocation of attention in dual-tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 171–180. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(96)00049-9
30. Ofan, R. H., Rubin, N., & Amodio, D. M. (2013). Situation-based social anxiety enhances the neural processing of faces: Evidence from an intergroup context. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi:10.1093/scan/nst087
31. Oken, B. S., & Chiappa, K. H. (1986). Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography. Annals of Neurology, 19, 493–494. doi:10.1002/ana.410190511
32. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
33. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing,ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
34. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443–447. doi:10.1126/science.1100301
35. Rothermund, K. (2003). Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence. Emotion, 3, 223–238. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.223
36. Schnuerch, R., & Gibbons, H. (in press). A review of neurocognitive mechanisms of social conformity. Social Psychology.
37. Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 154–167. doi:doi:10.1038/nrn2994
38. Shestakova, A., Rieskamp, J., Tugin, S., Ossadtchi, A., Krutitskaya, J., & Klucharev, V. (2013). Electrophysiological precursors of social conformity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 756–763. doi:10.1093/scan/nss064
39. Stallen, M., Smidts, A., & Sanfey, A. G. (2013). Peer influence: Neural mechanisms underlying in-group conformity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 50. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00050
40. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
41. Trautmann-Lengsfeld, S. A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2013). EEG reveals an early influence of social conformity on visual processing in group pressure situations. Social Neuroscience, 8, 75–89. doi:10.1080/17470919.2012.742927
42. Trautmann-Lengsfeld, S. A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2014). Virtually simulated social pressure influences early visual processing more in low compared to high autonomous participants. Psychophysiology, 51, 124–135. doi:10.1111/psyp.12161
43. Vorauer, J. D., & Miller, D. T. (1997). Failure to recognize the effect of implicit social influence on the presentation of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 281–295. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.281
44. Yu, R., & Sun, S. (2013). To conform or not to conform: Spontaneous conformity diminishes the sensitivity to monetary outcomes. Plos ONE, 8, e64530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064530