Instruments to measure patient experience of health care quality in hospitals: A systematic review protocol

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Beattie, Michelle ^a   Lauder, William ^a   Atherton, Iain ^a   Murphy, Douglas J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CHECKLIST; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; MEASUREMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE VALIDITY; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84907275612     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for 21st century 2001, Washington DC: National Academy Press, Institute of Medicine (IOM).
2. Department of Health High quality care for all. Gateway Ref 2008, 10106, Department of Health.
3. Scottish Government The healthcare quality strategy for NHS Scotland [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/311667/0098354.pdf], Scottish Government.
4. Quality I. Productivity and prevention (QIPP): the NHS atlas of variation in healthcare: reducing unwarranted variation to increase value and improve quality 2011, United Kingdom: Right Care.
5. Foundation H. Measuring patient experience: No. 18, evidence scan 2013, England: Health Foundation.
6. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. Br Med J Open 2013, 3:e001570.
7. Sofaer S, Firminger K. Patient perceptions of the quality of health services. Annu Rev Public Health 2005, 26:513-559. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.050503.153958, 15760300.
8. Department of Health A promise to learn - a commitment to act, improving the safety of patients in England 2013, England: National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England; William Lea publishers, Department of Health.
9. Lynn M, McMillen B, Sidani S. Understanding and measuring patients' assessment of the quality of nursing care. Nurs Res 2007, 56:59-166.
10. Bannigan K, Watson R. Reliability and validity in a nutshell. J Clin Nurs 2009, 18:3237-3243. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02939.x, 19930083.
11. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998, 47:1351-1359. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00213-5, 9783878.
12. Parker J, Nester CJ, Long AF, Barrie J. The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 2003, 24:56-60.
13. Coulter A. Can patients assess the quality of health care?. Br Med J 2006, 333:1-2.
14. Byrne K, Sims-Gould J, Frazee K, Martin-Mathews A. "I am satisfied.but": clients' and families' contingent responses about home care. Home Health Care Serv Q 2011, 30:161-177. 10.1080/01621424.2011.622242, 22106900.
15. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, Thomas H. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002, 6:1-6.
16. Erikson L. Patient satisfaction: an indicator of nursing care quality. Nurs Manage 1986, 18:31-35.
17. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38:509-516. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-X, 8184314.
18. Sixma H, Kerssens J, Campen C, Peters L. Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to new measuring instrument. Health Expect 1998, 1:82-95. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00004.x, 11281863.
19. Coulter A, Fitzpatrick R, Cornwell J. The point of care measures of patients' experience in hospital: purpose, methods and uses. The Kings Fund 2009, 1-32.
20. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring, Vol. 1, The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment 1980, Ann Arbour, MI: Health Admin Press.
21. Maxwell RJ. Quality assessment in health. Br Med J 1984, 288:1470-1472.
22. Beattie M, Shepherd A, Howieson B. Do the Institute of Medicines' (IOM) dimensions of quality capture the current meaning of quality in health care? - An integrative review. J Res Nurs 2012, 18:288-304.
23. van der Vleuten C. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996, 1:41-67.
24. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care: Centre for Review and Dissemination 2009, York: University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:1006-1012. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005, 19631508.
26. Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trails in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening tools. Stat Med 2002, 21:1635-1640. 10.1002/sim.1190, 12111924.
27. Chow A, Mayer E, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 2009, 146:435-443. 10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.019, 19715800.
28. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Protocol for the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006, 6:2. 10.1186/1471-2288-6-2, 1368990, 16433905.
29. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Stratford P, Alonso J, Patrick D, Riphagen I, Knol D, Bouter L, de Vet H. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2009, 18:313-333. 10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9, 19238586.
30. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D, Bouter L, de Vet H. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010, 19:539-549. 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8, 2852520, 20169472.
31. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. COSMIN checklist manual 2012, Amsterdam: Institute for Health and Care Research.
32. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986, 35:382-386.
33. Terwee C, Bet S, Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J, Bouter L, de Vet H. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:34-42. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, 17161752.
34. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. ESRC methods programme 2006, England: Lancaster University.