Rapid prediction of biomechanical costs during action decisions

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 112, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1256-1266

  Cos, Ignasi ^a,c,d   Duque, Julie ^b   Cisek, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Decision making; Human; Motor control; Motor intention; TMS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COST; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROMYOGRAM; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSCLE FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; STIMULATION; STIMULUS; TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT; MOTOR CORTEX; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PYRAMIDAL TRACT;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DECISION MAKING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PYRAMIDAL TRACTS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84907246535     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00147.2014     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baumann MA, Fluet MC, Scherberger H. Context-specific grasp movement representation in the macaque anterior intraparietal area. J Neurosci 29: 6436–6448, 2009.
2. Camille N, Tsuchida A, Fellows LK. Double dissociation of stimulus-value and action-value learning in humans with orbitofrontal or anterior cingulate cortex damage. J Neurosci 31: 15048–15052, 2011.
3. Cisek P. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362: 1585–1599, 2007.
4. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45: 801–814, 2005.
5. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 269–298, 2010.
6. Cos I, Bélanger N, Cisek P. The influence of predicted arm biomechanics on decision making. J Neurophysiol 105: 3022–3033, 2011.
7. Cos I, Medleg F, Cisek P. The modulatory influence of end-point controllability on decisions between actions. J Neurophysiol 108: 1764–1780, 2012.
8. Dounskaia N, Goble JA, Wang W. The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: Implications from directional preferences. J Neurophysiol 105: 999–1010, 2011.
9. Efron B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. Phila-delphia, PA: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
10. Evarts EV. Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. J Neurophysiol 31: 14–27, 1968.
11. Ghez C, Favilla M, Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Bermejo R, Pullman S. Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories. Exp Brain Res 115: 217–233, 1997.
12. Glimcher P. Decisions, decisions, decisions: Choosing a biological science of choice. Neuron 36: 323–332, 2002.
13. Goble JA, Zhang Y, Shimansky Y, Sharma S, Dounskaia NV. Directional biases reveal utilization of arm’s biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior. J Neurophysiol 98: 1240–1252, 2007.
14. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 535–574, 2007.
15. Hernández A, Nácher V, Luna R, Zainos A, Lemus L, Alvarez M, Vázquez Y, Camarillo L, Romo R. Decoding a perceptual decision process across cortex. Neuron 66: 300–314, 2010.
16. Hogan N. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: Part I–Theory. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 107: 1–7, 1985.
17. Hogan N. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: Part II–Imple-mentation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 107: 8–16, 1985.
18. Hogan N. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: Part III–Applications. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 107: 17–24, 1985.
19. Jordan MI, Rumelhart DE. Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn Sci 16: 307–354, 1992.
20. Kalaska JF, Cohen DA, Hyde ML, Prud’homme M. A comparison of movement direction-related versus load direction-related activity in primate motor cortex using a two-dimensional reaching task. J Neurosci 9: 2080–2102, 1989.
21. Kennerley SW, Behrens TEJ, Wallis JD. Double dissociation of value computations in orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate neurons. Nat Neurosci 14: 1581–1589, 2011.
22. Klaes C, Westendorff S, Chakrabarti S, Gail A. Choosing goals, not rules: Deciding among rule-based action plans. Neuron 70: 536–548, 2011.
23. Klein PA, Olivier E, Duque J. Influence of reward on corticospinal excitability during movement preparation. J Neurosci 32: 18124–18136, 2012.
24. Klein PA, Petitjean C, Olivier E, Duque J. Top-down suppression of incompatible motor activations during response selection under conflict. Neuroimage 86: 138–149, 2014.
25. Klein-Flügge MC, Bestmann S. Time-dependent changes in human corticospinal excitability reveal value-based competition for action during decision processing. J Neurosci 32: 8373–8382, 2012.
26. Ledberg A, Bressler SL, Ding M, Coppola R, Nakamura R. Large-scale visuomotor integration in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 17: 44–62, 2007.
27. MacKinnon CD, Rothwell JC. Time-varying changes in corticospinal excitability accompanying the triphasic EMG pattern in humans. J Physiol 528: 633–645, 2000.
28. McPeek RM, Keller EL. Superior colliculus activity related to concurrent processing of saccade goals in a visual search task. J Neurophysiol 87: 1805–1815, 2002.
29. Messier J, Kalaska JF. Covariation of primate dorsal premotor cell activity with direction and amplitude during a memorized-delay reaching task. J Neurophysiol 84: 152–165, 2000.
30. Miall RC, Wolpert DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9: 1265–1279, 1996.
31. Michelet T, Duncan GH, Cisek P. Response competition in the primary motor cortex: corticospinal excitability reflects response replacement during simple decisions. J Neurophysiol 104: 119–127, 2010.
32. Miller EK. The prefontral cortex and cognitive control. Nat Rev Neurosci 1: 59–65, 2000.
33. Miller EK, Freedman DJ, Wallis JD. The prefrontal cortex: categories, concepts, and cognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357: 1123–1136, 2002.
34. Padoa-Schioppa C. Neurobiology of economic choice: a good-based model. Annu Rev Neurosci 34: 333–359, 2011.
35. Pasquereau B, Turner RS. Limited encoding of effort by dopamine neurons in a cost-benefit trade-off task. J Neurosci 33: 8288–8300, 2013.
36. Pastor-Bernier A, Cisek P. Neural correlates of biased competition in premotor cortex. J Neurosci 31: 7083–7088, 2011.
37. Platt ML, Glimcher PW. Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature 400: 233–238, 1999.
38. Redgrave P, Prescott TJ, Gurney K. Is the short-latency dopamine response too short to signal reward error? Trends Neurosci 22: 146–151, 1999.
39. Rudebeck PH, Behrens TE, Kennerley SW, Baxter MG, Buckley MJ, Walton ME, Rushworth MF. Frontal cortex subregions play distinct roles in choices between actions and stimuli. J Neurosci 28: 13775–13785, 2008.
40. Sato TR, Watanabe K, Thompson KG, Schall JD. Effect of target-distractor similarity on FEF visual selection in the absence of the target. Exp Brain Res 151: 356–363, 2003.
41. Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT. Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 363–375, 2005.
42. Tanji J, Hoshi E. Behavioral planning in the prefrontal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 164–170, 2001.
43. Thach WT. Correlation of neural discharge with pattern and force of muscular activity, joint position, and direction of intended next movement in motor cortex and cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 41: 654–676, 1978.
44. Thura D, Cisek P. Deliberation and commitment in the premotor and primary motor cortex during dynamic decision making. Neuron 81: 1401–1416, 2014.
45. Van Elswijk G, Kleine BU, Overeem S, Stegeman DF. Expectancy induces dynamic modulation of corticospinal excitability. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 121–131, 2007.
46. Yang T, Shadlen MN. Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature 447: 1075–1080, 2007.