Erratum to The modulatory influence of end-point controllability on decisions between actions(J Neurophysiol (2012), 108, (1764-1780), 10.1152/jn.00081.2012));The modulatory influence of end-point controllability on decisions between actions

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1764-1780

  Cos, Ignasi ^a   Medleg, Farid ^b   Cisek, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arm; Human; Motor control; Motor intention; Response selection

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84866404493     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.z9k-1696-corr.2012     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Alexander RM. A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. Biol Cybern 76: 97-105, 1997.
2. Baumann MA, Fluet MC, Scherberger H. Context-specific grasp movement representation in the macaque anterior intraparietal area. J Neurosci 29: 6436-6448, 2009.
3. Bottaro A, Yasutake Y, Nomura T, Casadio M, Morasso P. Bounded stability of the quiet standing posture: an intermittent control model. Hum Mov Sci 27: 473-495, 2008.
4. Churchland MM, Afshar A, Shenoy KV. A central source of movement variability. Neuron 52: 1085-1096, 2006.
5. Cisek P. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci 362: 1585-1599, 2007.
6. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Simultaneous encoding of multiple potential reach directions in dorsal premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol 87: 1149-1154, 2002.
7. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45: 801-814, 2005.
8. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 269-298, 2010.
9. Cos I, Bélanger N, Cisek P. The influence of predicted arm biomechanics on decision making. J Neurophysiol 105: 3022-3033, 2011.
10. Dounskaia N. The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements. Exp Brain Res 166: 1-16, 2005.
11. Dounskaia N, Goble JA, Wang W. The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: implications from directional preferences. J Neurophysiol 105: 999-1010, 2011.
12. Efron B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia, PA: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
13. Engelbrecht SE. Minimum principles in motor control. J Math Psychol 45: 497-542, 2001.
14. Evarts EV. Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. J Neurophysiol 31: 14-27, 1968.
15. Flanagan JR, Lolley S. The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. J Neurosci 21: 1361-1369, 2001.
16. Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM. Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 13: 146-150, 2003.
17. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of handheld loads. J Neurosci 17: 1519-1528, 1997.
18. Friston K. What is optimal about motor control? Neuron 72: 488-498, 2011.
19. Ghez C, Gordon J. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. I. Role of opposing muscles. Exp Brain Res 67: 225-240, 1987.
20. Goble JA, Zhang Y, Shimansky Y, Sharma S, Dounskaia NV. Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior. J Neurophysiol 98: 1240-1252, 2007.
21. Gomi H, Osu R. Task-dependent viscoelasticity of human multijoint arm and its spatial characteristics for interaction with environments. J Neurosci 18: 8965-8978, 1998.
22. Gritsenko V, Kalaska JF, Cisek P. Descending corticospinal control of intersegmental dynamics. J Neurosci 31: 11968-11979, 2011.
23. Guigon E, Baraduc P, Desmurget M. Computational motor control: redundancy and invariance. J Neurophysiol 97: 331-347, 2007.
24. Hamilton AF, Wolpert DM. Controlling the statistics of action: obstacle avoidance. J Neurophysiol 87: 2434-2440, 2002.
25. Harris CM, Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
26. Hogan N. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: part I-theory. J Dyn Sys Meas Control 107: 1-7, 1985a.
27. Hogan N. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: part II-implementation. J Dyn Sys Meas Control 107: 8-16, 1985b.
28. Hogan N. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: part III-applications. J Dyn Sys Meas Control 107: 17-24, 1985c.
29. Kistemaker DA, Wong JD, Gribble PL. The central nervous system does not minimize energy cost in arm movements. J Neurophysiol 104: 2985-2994, 2010.
30. Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R. Towards a computational neuropsychology of action. Prog Brain Res 165: 383-394, 2007.
31. Kurtzer I, Herter TM, Scott SH. Nonuniform distribution of reach-related and torque-related activity in upper arm muscles and neurons of primary motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 96: 3220-3230, 2006.
32. Lakie M, Caplan N, Loram ID. Human balancing of an inverted pendulum with a compliant linkage: neural control by anticipatory intermittent bias. J Physiol 551: 357-370, 2003.
33. Lakie M, Loram ID. Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process. J Physiol 577: 403-416, 2006.
34. Lametti DR, Ostry DJ. Postural constraints on movement variability. J Neurophysiol 104: 1061-1067, 2010.
35. McPeek RM, Keller EL. Superior colliculus activity related to concurrent processing of saccade goals in a visual search task. J Neurophysiol 87: 1805-1815, 2002.
36. Morasso PG, Sanguineti V. Ankle muscle stiffness alone cannot stabilize balance during quiet standing. J Neurophysiol 88: 2157-2162, 2002.
37. Ostry DJ, Feldman AG. A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control. Exp Brain Res 153: 275-288, 2003.
38. Pastor-Bernier A, Cisek P. Neural correlates of biased competition in premotor cortex. J Neurosci 31: 7083-7088, 2011.
39. Sabes PN, Jordan MI. Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model for motor planning. J Neurosci 17: 7119-7128, 1997.
40. Sabes PN, Jordan MI, Wolpert DM. The role of inertial sensitivity in motor planning. J Neurosci 18: 5948-5957, 1998.
41. Selen LPJ, Beek PJ, Dieën JH. Impedance is modulated to meet accuracy demands during goal-directed arm movements. Exp Brain Res 172: 129-138, 2005.
42. Selen LPJ, van Dieën JH, Beek PJ. Impedance modulation and feedback corrections in tracking targets of variable size and frequency. J Neurophysiol 96: 2750-2759, 2006.
43. Sergio LE, Hamel-Pâquet C, Kalaska JF. Motor cortex neural correlates of output kinematics and kinetics during isometric-force and arm-reaching tasks. J Neurophysiol 94: 2353-2378, 2005.
44. Shadmehr R. Control of movements and temporal discounting of reward. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20: 726-730, 2010.
45. Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res 185: 359-381, 2008.
46. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements. J Neurosci 19: 8573-8588, 1999.
47. Trommershäuser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS. Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response. Spat Vis 16: 255-275, 2003.
48. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan M. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882, 1995.