A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests

Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 470, Issue 2170, 2014, Pages

  George, David L ^a   Iverson, Richard M ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Debris flow; Granular fluid mixtures; Hyperbolic problems; Landslide

Indexed keywords

DEPOSITION; EXPERIMENTS; LANDSLIDES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; OPEN SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STABILITY; VOLUME FRACTION;

ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; DEBRIS FLOWS; FLUID MIXTURES; HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS; NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS; OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARES; SOLID VOLUME FRACTION;

DEBRIS;

EID: 84907221089     PISSN: 13645021     EISSN: 14712946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2013.0820     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Iverson RM, George DL. 2014 A depth-averaged debris-flowmodel that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis.Proc. R. Soc. A 470, 20130819. (doi:10.1 098/rspa.2013.0819
2. Stoker JJ. 1957Water waves: the mathematical theory with applications.New York,NY: Interscience Publishers.
3. Iverson RM. 2003 The debris-flow rheology myth. In Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment (eds D Rickenmann, CL Chen), pp. 303-314. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Millpress.
4. Pitman EB, Le L. 2005 A two-fluid model for avalanche and debris flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 363, 1573-1601. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1596
5. Jackson R. 2000 The dynamics of fluidized particles. Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Pelanti M, Bouchut F, Mangeney A. 2008 A Roe-type scheme for two-phase shallow granular flows over variable topography.Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 42, 851-885. (doi:10.1051/m2an:2008029)
7. Pelanti M, Bouchut F, Mangeney-Castelnau A, Vilotte JP. 2006 Numerical modeling of twophase gravitational granular flows with bottom topography. In Hyperbolic problems: theory, numerics, applications (eds S Benzoni-Gavage, D Serre). Proc. 11'th Intl. Conf. on Hyperbolic Problems, 2008, pp. 825-832. Berlin: Springer.
8. Pudasaini SP. 2012 A general two-phase debris flow model. J. Geophys. Res. 117, F03010. (doi:10.1029/2011JF002186
9. Kowalski J. 2008 Two-phase modeling of debris flows. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
10. Iverson RM., 1997 The physics of debris flows. Rev. Geophys. 35, 245-296, 10.1029/97RG00426)
11. Iverson RM, Denlinger RP. 2001 Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across threedimensional terrain. 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J. Geophys. Res. 1 06, 537-552. (doi:10.1029/2000JB900329
12. Kowalski J, McElwaine JN. 2013 Shallow two-component gravity-driven flows with vertical variation. J. Fluid Mech. 714, 434-462. (doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.489
13. Iverson RM, Reid ME, LaHusen RG. 1997 Debris-flow mobilization from landslides. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 25, 85-138. (doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.85
14. Iverson RM, Reid ME, Iverson NR, LaHusen RG, Logan M, Mann JE, Brien DL. 2000 Acute sensitivity of landslide rates to initial soil porosity. Science 290, 513-516. (doi:10.1126/scien ce.290.5491.513
15. Iverson RM, LoganM, LaHusen RG, Berti M. 2010 The perfect debris flow? aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 115, 1-29. (doi:10.1029/2009JF001514)
16. Savage SB, Hutter K. 1991 The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout, part I. Analysis. Acta Mech. 86, 201-223. (doi:10.1007/BF01175958
17. LeVeque RJ. 2002 Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Dal Maso G, LeFloch PG, Murat F. 1995 Definition and weak stability of nonconservative products. J. Math. Pures Appl. 74, 483-548.
19. Castro MJ, LeFloch PG, Munoz ML, Parés C. 2008 Why many theories of shock waves are necessary: convergence error in formally pat h-consistent schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 8107-8129. (doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2008.05.012
20. Bressan A. 2000 Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. The one-dimensional Cauchy problem. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21. Bressan A, Crasta G, Piccoli B. 2000 Well posedness of the Cauchy problem for n × n conservation laws. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 694, viii+134.
22. de Saint-Venant AJ C. 1871 Théorie du mouvement non-permanent des eaux, avec application aux crues des riviéres et á l'introduction des marees dans leur lit. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 73, 147-154.
23. Savage SB, Hutter K. 1989 The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 177-215. (doi:10.1017/S0022112089000340
24. Bouchut F,Mangeney-Castelnau A, Perthame B, Vilotte J-P. 2003 A new model of Saint Venant and Savage-Hutter type for gravity driven shallow water flows. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris I336, 531-536. (doi:10.1016/S1631-073X(03)00117-1
25. Greve R, Koch T,Hutter K. 199 4 Unconfined flow of granular avalanches along a partly curved surface. 1. Theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 445, 399-413. (doi:10.1098/rspa.1994.0068
26. Gray JMNT, Weiland M, Hutter K. 1999 Gravi ty-driven free surface flow of granular avalanches over complex basal topography. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455, 1841-1874. (doi:10.1098/rspa.1999.0383
27. Bouchut R, Westdickenberg M. 2004 Gravity driven shallow water models for arbitrary topography. Comm. Math. Sci. 2, 359-389. (doi:10.4310/CMS.2004.v2.n3.a2
28. Pudasaini SP, Wang Y, Hutter K. 2005 Modelling debris flows down general channels. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 5, 799-819. (doi:10.5194/nhess-5-799-2005
29. Keller JB. 2003 Shallow-water theory for arbitrary slopes of the bottom. J. Fluid Mech. 489, 345-348. (doi:10.1017/S0022112003005342
30. Godunov SK. 1959 A difference method for numerical calculation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of hydrodynamics. Mat. Sb. 47, 271-306.
31. Lax PD,Wendroff B., 19603Systems of conservation laws. Comm. Pure Appl. Math, 13, 217-237, 10.1002/cpa.3160130205)
32. Godlewski E, Raviart P. 1996 Numerical approximation of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. New York, NY: Springer.
33. Toro EF. 1997 Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
34. Clawpack. 2013 The clawpack software. See http://www.clawpack.org.
35. Berger MJ, George DL, LeVeque RJ, Mandli KT. 2011 The GeoClaw software for depthaveraged flows with adaptive refinement. Adv. Water Resour. 34, 1195-1206. (doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.02.016
36. LeVeque RJ, George DL, Berger MJ. 2011 Tsunami modeling with adaptively refined finite volume methods. Acta Numerica 20, 211-289. (doi:10.1017/S0962492911000043
37. George DL. 2011 Adaptive finite volume methods with well-balanced Riemann solvers for modeling floods in rug ged terrain: application to the Malpasset dam-break flood (France, 1959). Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 66, 1000-1018. (doi:10.1002/fld.2298
38. LeVeque RJ. 1988 High resolution finite volume methods on arbitrary grids via wave propagaton. J. Comput. Phys. 78, 36-63. (doi:10.1016/0021-9991(88)90036-8
39. Bale DS, LeVeque RJ, Mitran S, Rossmanith JA. 2002 A wave propagation method for conser vation laws and balance laws with spatially varying flux functions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24, 955-978. (doi:10.1137/S106482750139738X
40. Roe PL. 1981 Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43, 357-372. (doi:10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5
41. Hou T, LeFloch P. 1994 Why non-conservative schemes converge to the wrong solutions: error analysis. Math. Comput. 62, 497-530. (doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1994-1201068-0
42. Greenberg JM, LeRoux AY. 1996 A well-balanced scheme for numerical processing of source terms in hyperbolic equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33, 1-16. (doi:10.1137/0733001
43. Bouchut F. 2004 Nonlinear stability of finite volume methods for hyperbolic conservation laws and well-balanced schemes for sources. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
44. Mangeney-Castelnau A, Bouchut F, Vilotte JP, Lajeunesse E, Aubertin A, Pirulli M. 2005 On the use of Saint-Venant equations for simulating the spreading of a granular mass. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B09103. (doi:10.1029/2004JB003161
45. Castro-Díaz MJ, Chacón Rebollo T, Fernández-Nieto ED, Parés C. 2007 On well-balanced finite volume methods for nonconservative nonhomogeneous hyperbolic systems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29, 1093-1126. (doi:10.1137/040607642
46. Mangeney A, Bouchut F, Thomas N, Vilotte JP, Bristeau MO. 2007 Numerical modeling of self-channeling granular flows and their levee-channel deposits. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F02017. (doi:10.1029/2006JF000469
47. George DL. 2008 Augmented Riemann solvers for the shallow water equations over variable topography with steady states and inundation. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 3089-3113. (doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2007.10.027
48. Brufau P, Vázquez-Céndon ME, García-Navarro P. 2003 A numerical model for the flooding and drying of irregular domains. Int. J. Nume r. Meth. Fluids 39, 247-275. (doi:10.1002/fld.285
49. Kurganov A, Petrova G. 2007 A second-order well-balanced positivity preserving centralupwind scheme for the Saint-Venant system. Commun. Math. Sci. 5, 133-160. (doi:10.4310/CMS.2007.v5.n1.a6
50. Marche F, Bonneton P, Fabrie P, Seguin N. 2007 Evaluation of well-balanced bore-capturing schemes for 2d wetting and drying processes. Int. J. Nume r. Meth. Fluids 53, 867-894. (doi:10.1002/fld.1311
51. LeVeque RJ. 1997 Wave propagation algorithms for multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 131, 327-335. (doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.5603)
52. Berger MJ, Oliger J., 1984, Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys., 53, 484-512, 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90073-1)
53. Berger MJ, LeVeque RJ. 1998 Adaptive mesh refinement using wave-propagation algorithms for hyperbolic systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35, 346-365. (doi:10.1137/S0036142997315974
54. Logan M, Iverson RM. Video documentation of experiments at the USGS debris-flow flume, 1992-2006 (amended to include 2007-2013), 2007. US Geological Survey Open-file Report 2007-1315. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1315/)
55. Reid ME, LaHusen RG, Iverson RM. 1997 Debris-flow initiation experiments using diverse hydrologic triggers. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proc eedings (ed. CL Chen), pp. 1-11. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers.
56. Riemer MF, Seed RB. 1997 Factors affecting apparent position of steady-state line. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123, 281-288. (doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:3(281)
57. Dai F, Lee CF, Wang S, Feng Y. 1999 Stress-strain behaviour of a loosely compacted volcanicderived soil and its significance to rainfall-induced fill slope failures. Eng. Geol. 53, 359-370. (doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00016-2
58. Schaeffer D, Iverson R. 2008 Steady and intermittent slipping in a model of landslide motion regulated by pore-pressure feedback. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 69, 769-786. (doi:10.1137/07070704X
59. Iverson RM. 2009 Elements of an improved model of debris-flow motion. In Powders and Grains 2009 (ed. M Nakagawa and S Luding), pp. 9-16. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.
60. Johnson CG, Kokelaar BP, Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Gray JMNT. 2012 Grainsize segregation and levee formation in geophysical mass flows. J. Geophys. Res. 117, F01032. (doi:10.1029/2011JF002185
61. Castro M, Gallardo JM, Parés C. 2006 High ord er finite volume schemes based on reconstruction of states for solving hyperbolic systems with nonconservative products. Applications to shallow water systems. Math. Comp. 75, 1103-1134. (doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-06-01851-5