Combined fluorescent and electron microscopic imaging unveils the specific properties of two classes of meiotic crossovers

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 37, 2014, Pages 13415-13420

  Anderson, Lorinda K ^a   Lohmiller, Leslie D ^a   Tang, Xiaomin ^a   Hammond, D Boyd ^a   Javernick, Lauren ^a   Shearer, Lindsay ^a   Basu Roy, Sayantani ^b   Martin, Olivier C ^b   Falque, Matthieu ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Genetic interference; MLH1; MUS81; Recombination nodule; Synaptonemal complex

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

CROSSING OVER; CYTOLOGY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; METABOLISM; PLANT CHROMOSOME; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOMATO; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PLANT PROTEINS; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

EID: 84907195514     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406846111     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Jones GH, Franklin FCH (2006) Meiotic crossing-over: Obligation and interference. Cell 126(2):246-248.
2. Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver G.P. (2010) Genetic interference: Don't stand so close to me. Curr Genomics 11(2):91-102.
3. Zickler D, Kleckner N. (1999) Meiotic chromosomes: Integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet 33:603-754.
4. Keeney S (2001) Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 52:1-53.
5. Hollingsworth NM, Brill S.J. (2004) The Mus81 solution to resolution: Generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions. Genes Dev 18(2):117-125.
6. Zakharyevich K, Tang S, Ma Y., Hunter N. (2012) Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 149(2): 334-347.
7. De Muyt A, et al. (2012) BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. Mol Cell 46(1):43-53.
8. Osman K, Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong S.J., Franklin F.C. (2011) Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 190(3):523-544.
9. Ehmsen KT, Heyer W.D. (2008) Biochemistry of meiotic recombination: Formation, processing, and resolution of recombination intermediates. Recombination and Meiosis, eds Egel R, Lankenau D-H (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), pp 91-164.
10. Lynn A, Soucek R, Börner GV (2007) ZMM proteins during meiosis: Crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res 15(5):591-605.
11. Berchowitz LE, Francis KE, Bey A.L., Copenhaver G.P. (2007) The role of AtMUS81 in interference-insensitive crossovers in A. thaliana. PLoS Genet 3(8):e132.
12. Holloway JK, Booth J, Edelmann W., McGowan CH, Cohen P.E. (2008) MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet 4(9):e1000186.
13. Higgins JD, Buckling EF, Franklin FCH, Jones G.H. (2008) Expression and functional analysis of AtMUS81 in Arabidopsis meiosis reveals a role in the second pathway of crossing-over. Plant J 54(1):152-162.
14. Crismani W, et al. (2012) FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 336(6088): 1588-1590.
15. Page SL, Hawley R.S. (2004) The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:525-558.
16. Sherman JD, Stack S.M. (1995) Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genetics 141(2):683-708.
17. Marcon E, Moens P. (2003) MLH1p and MLH3p localize to precociously induced chi-asmata of okadaic-acid-treated mouse spermatocytes. Genetics 165(4):2283-2287.
18. Anderson LK, Stack S.M. (2005) Recombination nodules in plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 109(1-3):198-204.
19. Lhuissier FGP, Offenberg HH, Wittich P.E., Vischer NO, Heyting C. (2007) The mismatch repair protein MLH1 marks a subset of strongly interfering crossovers in tomato. Plant Cell 19(3):862-876.
20. Froenicke L, Anderson LK, Wienberg J, Ashley T. (2002) Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. Am J Hum Genet 71(6): 1353-1368.
21. de los Santos T, et al. (2003) The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164(1):81-94.
22. Higgins JD, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones G.H. (2004) The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: Evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18(20):2557-2570.
23. Chelysheva L, et al. (2012) The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3. PLoS Genet 8:e1002799, -doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002799.
24. Copenhaver GP, Housworth EA, Stahl F.W. (2002) Crossover interference in Arabi-dopsis. Genetics 160(4):1631-1639.
25. Schwartz EK, et al. (2012) Mus81-Mms4 functions as a single heterodimer to cleave nicked intermediates in recombinational DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 32(15):3065-3080.
26. Argueso JL, et al. (2003) Systematic mutagenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH1 gene reveals distinct roles for Mlh1p in meiotic crossing over and in vegetative and meiotic mismatch repair. Mol Cell Biol 23(3):873-886.
27. Pigozzi MI (2001) Distribution of MLH1 foci on the synaptonemal complexes of chicken oocytes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 95(3-4):129-133.
28. Basheva EA, Bidau CJ, Borodin P.M. (2008) General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization. Chromosome Res 16(5):709-719.
29. Jessop L, Lichten M. (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31(3):313-323.
30. Schwartz EK, Heyer W.D. (2011) Processing of joint molecule intermediates by structure-selective endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Chromosoma 120(2):109-127.
31. Giraut L, et al. (2011) Genome-wide crossover distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana meiosis reveals sex-specific patterns along chromosomes. PLoS Genet 7(11):e1002354.
32. Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485(7400):635-641.
33. Bauer E, et al. (2013) Intraspecific variation of recombination rate in maize. Genome Biol 14(9):R103.
34. Oh SD, Lao JP, Taylor A.F., Smith GR, Hunter N. (2008) RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. Mol Cell 31(3):324-336.
35. Guillon H, Baudat F, Grey C., Liskay RM, de Massy B (2005) Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol Cell 20(4):563-573.
36. Stack SM, Anderson L.K. (1986) Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. II. Synapsis in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Am J Bot 73:264-281.
37. Higgins JD, et al. (2012) Spatiotemporal asymmetry of the meiotic program underlies the predominantly distal distribution of meiotic crossovers in barley. Plant Cell 24(10): 4096-4109.
38. Falque M, Mercier R, Mézard C, de Vienne D, Martin O.C. (2007) Patterns of recombination and MLH1 foci density along mouse chromosomes: Modeling effects of interference and obligate chiasma. Genetics 176(3):1453-1467.
39. Kleckner N, et al. (2004) A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(34):12592-12597.
40. Petkov PM, Broman KW, Szatkiewicz J.P., Paigen K. (2007) Crossover interference underlies sex differences in recombination rates. Trends Genet 23(11):539-542.
41. Anderson LK, Hooker KD, Stack S.M. (2001) The distribution of early recombination nodules on zygotene bivalents from plants. Genetics 159(3):1259-1269.
42. Fung JC, Rockmill B, Odell M., Roeder G.S. (2004) Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 116(6): 795-802.
43. Martini E, Diaz RL, Hunter N, Keeney S. (2006) Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 126(2):285-295.
44. Cole F, et al. (2012) Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 14(4):424-430.
45. Stack SM, Anderson L.K. (2009) Electron microscopic immunogold localization of recombination-related proteins in spreads of synaptonemal complexes from tomato microsporocytes. Meiosis: Cytological Methods, ed Keeney S (Humana, Totowa, NJ), Vol 2, pp 147-169.
46. Anderson LK, Stack S.M. (2013) Preparing SC spreads with RNs for EM analysis. Plant Meiosis: Methods and Protocols, eds Pawlowski WP, Grelon M, Armstrong S (Spring Science + Business Media, New York), pp 147-158.
47. Lohmiller LD, et al. (2008) Cytological analysis of MRE11 protein during early meiotic prophase I in Arabidopsis and tomato. Chromosoma 117(3):277-288.
48. McPeek MS, Speed T.P. (1995) Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics 139(2):1031-1044.
49. Broman KW, Weber J.L. (2000) Characterization of human crossover interference. Am J Hum Genet 66(6):1911-1926.
50. Gauthier F, Martin OC, Falque M. (2011) CODA (crossover distribution analyzer): Quantitative characterization of crossover position patterns along chromosomes. BMC Bioinformatics 12:27.