A longitudinal study of auditory evoked field and language development in young children

NeuroImage

Volumn 101, Issue , 2014, Pages 440-447

  Yoshimura, Yuko ^a   Kikuchi, Mitsuru ^a   Ueno, Sanae ^a   Shitamichi, Kiyomi ^a   Remijn, Gerard B ^b   Hiraishi, Hirotoshi ^a   Hasegawa, Chiaki ^a   Furutani, Naoki ^a   Oi, Manabu ^a   Munesue, Toshio ^a   Tsubokawa, Tsunehisa ^a   Higashida, Haruhiro ^a   Minabe, Yoshio ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked field; Human voice; Language conceptual inference ability; Longitudinal study; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Young children

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; CHILD; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LINGUISTICS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOCALIZATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; DEVICES; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; AGE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; JAPANESE (PEOPLE); LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEFT HEMISPHERE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VOICE;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

AUDITORY CORTEX; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84907027342     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.034     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson V., Hiramoto M., Wong A. Prosodic analysis of the interactional particle Ne in Japanese gendered speech. Jpn. Korean Linguist. 2007, 15:43-54.
2. Chait M., Simon J.Z., Poeppel D. Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications. Neuroreport 2004, 15:2455-2458.
3. Choudhury N., Benasich A.A. Maturation of auditory evoked potentials from 6 to 48months: prediction to 3 and 4year language and cognitive abilities. Clin Neurophysiol 2011, 122:320-338.
4. Cook H.M. The Sentence-final Particle Ne as a Tool for Cooperation in Japanese conversation 1990, The Stanford Linguistic Association, Stanford.
5. Cunningham J., Nicol T., Zecker S., Kraus N. Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear Hear. 2000, 21:554-568.
6. Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., Saermark K. Auditory magnetic fields from the human cerebral cortex: location and strength of an equivalent current dipole. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1982, 65:553-569.
7. Espy K.A., Molfese D.L., Molfese V.J., Modglin A. Development of auditory event-related potentials in young children and relations to word-level reading abilities at age 8years. Ann. Dyslexia 2004, 54:9-38.
8. Fonov V., Evans A.C., Botteron K., Almli C.R., McKinstry R.C., Collins D.L., Brain Development Cooperative G. Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage 2011, 54:313-327.
9. Fujioka T., Ross B., Kakigi R., Pantev C., Trainor L.J. One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children. Brain 2006, 129:2593-2608.
10. Gilley P.M., Sharma A., Dorman M., Martin K. Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005, 116:648-657.
11. Heim S., Eulitz C., Elbert T. Altered hemispheric asymmetry of auditory P100m in dyslexia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17:1715-1722.
12. Herrmann B., Maess B., Hahne A., Schroger E., Friederici A.D. Syntactic and auditory spatial processing in the human temporal cortex: an MEG study. Neuroimage 2011, 57:624-633.
13. Hertrich I., Mathiak K., Lutzenberger W., Ackermann H. Differential impact of periodic and aperiodic speech-like acoustic signals on magnetic M50/M100 fields. Neuroreport 2000, 11:4017-4020.
14. Huotilainen M., Shestakova A., Hukki J. Using magnetoencephalography in assessing auditory skills in infants and children. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 68:123-129.
15. Johnson B.W., Crain S., Thornton R., Tesan G., Reid M. Measurement of brain function in pre-school children using a custom sized whole-head MEG sensor array. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121:340-349.
16. Kajikawa S., Amano S., Kondo T. Speech overlap in Japanese mother-child conversations. J. Child. Lang. 2004, 31:215-230.
17. Kaufman A., Kaufman N. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: Administration and Scoring Manual 1983, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines MN.
18. Kotilahti K., Nissila I., Nasi T., Lipiainen L., Noponen T., Merilainen P., Huotilainen M., Fellman V. Hemodynamic responses to speech and music in newborn infants. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:595-603.
19. Leppänen P.H.T., Hamalainen J.A., Salminen H.K., Eklund K.M., Guttorm T.K., Lohvansuu K., Puolakanaho A., Lyytinen H. Newborn brain event-related potentials revealing atypical processing of sound frequency and the subsequent association with later literacy skills in children with familial dyslexia. Cortex 2010, 46:1362-1376.
20. Leppänen P.H.T., Hamalainen J.A., Guttorm T.K., Eklund K.M., Salminen H., Tanskanen A., Torppa M., Puolakanaho A., Richardson U., Pennala R., Lyytinen H. Infant brain responses associated with reading-related skills before school and at school age. Neurophysiol. Clin. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 42:35-41.
21. Oram Cardy J.E., Ferrari P., Flagg E.J., Roberts W., Roberts T.P. Prominence of M50 auditory evoked response over M100 in childhood and autism. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1867-1870.
22. Oram Cardy J.E., Flagg E.J., Roberts W., Roberts T.P. Auditory evoked fields predict language ability and impairment in children. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 68:170-175.
23. Orekhova E.V., Tsetlin M.M., Butorina A.V., Novikova S.I., Gratchev V.V., Sokolov P.A., Elam M., Stroganova T.A. Auditory cortex responses to clicks and sensory modulation difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). PLoS ONE 2012, 7.
24. Orekhova E.V., Butorina A.V., Tsetlin M.M., Novikova S.I., Sokolov P.A., Elam M., Stroganova T.A. Auditory magnetic response to clicks in children and adults: its components, hemispheric lateralization and repetition suppression effect. Brain Topogr. 2013, 26:410-427.
25. Pang E.W. Practical aspects of running developmental studies in the MEG. Brain Topogr. 2011, 24:253-260.
26. Pang E.W., Taylor M.J. Tracking the development of the N1 from age 3 to adulthood: an examination of speech and non-speech stimuli. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:388-397.
27. Pihko E., Mickos A., Kujala T., Pihlgren A., Westman M., Alku P., Byring R., Korkman M. Group intervention changes brain activity in bilingual language-impaired children. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:849-858.
28. Ponton C., Eggermont J.J., Khosla D., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113:407-420.
29. Sakai K.L. Language acquisition and brain development. Science 2005, 310:815-819.
30. Sharma A., Kraus N., McGee T.J., Nicol T.G. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, 104:540-545.
31. Squires T. A discourse analysis of the Japanese particle sa. Pragmatics 2009, 4:1-29.
32. Sussman E., Steinschneider M., Gumenyuk V., Grushko J., Lawson K. The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates. Hear. Res. 2008, 236:61-79.
33. Tavabi K., Obleser J., Dobel C., Pantev C. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 25:3155-3162.
34. Wilke M., Holland S.K., Altaye M., Gaser C. Template-O-Matic: a toolbox for creating customized pediatric templates. Neuroimage 2008, 41:903-913.
35. Yoshimura Y., Kikuchi M., Shitamichi K., Ueno S., Remijn G.B., Haruta Y., Oi M., Munesue T., Tsubokawa T., Higashida H., Minabe Y. Language performance and auditory evoked fields in 2- to 5-year-old children. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 35:644-650.
36. Yoshimura Y., Kikuchi M., Shitamichi K., Ueno S., Munesue T., Ono Y., Tsubokawa T., Haruta Y., Oi M., Niida Y., Remijn G.B., Takahashi T., Suzuki M., Higashida H., Minabe Y. Atypical brain lateralisation in the auditory cortex and language performance in 3- to 7-year-old children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: a child-customised magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. Mol. Autism 2013, 4:38.