Phasor measurement unit selection for unobservable electric power data integrity attack detection

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 155-164

  Giani, Annarita ^a   Bent, Russell ^a   Pan, Feng ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyber security; Integer programming; Phasor measurement units; Smart grid; Synchrophasors; Unobservable data integrity attacks

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; PHASOR MEASUREMENT UNITS;

BAD DATA DETECTIONS; CYBER SECURITY; DATA INTEGRITY; MEASUREMENT DEVICE; PHASOR MEASUREMENT UNIT (PMUS); REMOTE MEASUREMENT; SMART GRID; SYNCHRO-PHASORS;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 84906948800     PISSN: 18745482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2014.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. F. Aminifar, A. Khodaei, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Shahidehpour, Contingency-constrained PMU placement in power networks, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems25 (1) (2010) 516-523.
2. T. Cai, Q. Ai, Research of PMU optimal placement in power systems, in:Proceedings of the Fifth WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Systems Theory and Scientific Computation, 2005, pp. 38-43.
3. S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, M. Albu, Uncertainty in power system state variables obtained through synchronized measurements, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement58 (8) (2009) 2452-2458.
4. J. Chen, A. Abur, Placement of PMUs to enable bad data detection in state estimation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems21 (4) (2006) 1608-1615.
5. G. Dan, H. Sandberg, Stealth attacks and protection schemes for state estimators in power systems, in: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, 2010, pp. 214-219.
6. S. D'Antonio, L. Coppolino, I. Elia, V. Formicola, Security issues of a phasor data concentrator for smart grid infrastructure, in: Proceedings of the Thirteenth European Workshop on Dependable Computing, 2011, pp. 3-8.
7. X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang, Smart grid-The new and improved power grid: A survey, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials14 (4) (2012) 944-980.
8. H. Farhangi, The path of the smart grid, IEEE Power and Energy8 (1) (2010) 18-28.
9. A. Giani, E. Bitar, M. Garcia, M. McQueen, P. Khargonekar, K. Poolla, Smart grid data integrity attacks, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid4 (3) (2013) 1244-1253.
10. A. Giani, F. Pan, R. Bent, K. Poolla, Phasor Measurement Unit Placement for Unobservable Attack Detection, Technical Report LA-UR-13-24315, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2013.
11. O. Kosut, L. Jia, R. Thomas and L. Tong, Malicious data attacks on the smart grid, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid2 (4) (2011) 645-658.
12. Q. Li, T. Cui, Y. Weng, R. Negi, F. Franchetti, M Ilic, An information-theoretic approach to PMU placement in electric power systems, 2012. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.2934v1.pdf.
13. O. Linda, A. Giani, M. Manic, M. McQueen, Multi-criteria based staging of optimal PMU placement using fuzzy weighted average, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2013.
14. Y. Liu, P. Ning, M. Reiter, False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids, ACM Transactions on Information System Security14 (1) (2011) 13:1-13:33.
15. M. Manousakis, G. Korres, P. Georgilakis, Taxonomy of PMU placement methodologies, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems27 (2) (2012) 1070-1077.
16. M. McQueen, A. Giani, "Known secure sensor measurements" for critical infrastructure systems: Detecting falsification of system state, in: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Engineering for Resilient Systems, 2011, pp. 156-163.
17. A. Monticelli, Electric power system state estimation, Proceedings of the IEEE88 (2) (2000) 262-282.
18. A. Phadke, Synchronized phasor measurements in power systems, IEEE Computer Applications in Power6 (2) (1993) 10-15.
19. D. Shepard, T. Humphreys, A. Fansler, Evaluation of the vulnerability of phasor measurement units to GPS spoofing attacks, International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection5 (3-4) (2012) 146-153.
20. R. Shewale, B. Kethineni, U. Balaraju, S. Bhil, P. More, Optimal pacement of phasor measurement units for power system observability by heuristic search method, International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Research2 (2) (2012) 128-133.
21. D. Singh, J. Pandey, D. Chauhan, Topology identification, bad data processing and state estimation using fuzzy pattern matching, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems20 (3) (2005) 1570-1579.
22. H. Singh, F. Alvarado, Network topology determination using least absolute value state estimation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems10 (3) (1995) 1159-1165.
23. R. Singh, E. Manitsas, B. Pal, G. Strbac, A recursive Bayesian approach for identification of network configuration changes in distribution system state estimation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems25 (3) (2010) 1329-1336.
24. R. Sodhi, S. Srivastava, S. Singh, Optimal PMU placement to ensure system observability under contingencies, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2009.
25. B. Xu, A. Abur, Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs, in: Proceedings of the Power Systems Conference and Exposition2 (2004) 943-946.
26. W. Yuill, A. Edwards, S. Chowdhury, S. Chowdhury, Optimal PMU placement: A comprehensive literature review, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2011.
27. R. Zimmerman, C. Murillo-Sanchez, R. Thomas, MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning and analysis tools for power systems research and education, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems26 (1) (2011) 12-19.