Correlation between sensory and instrumental measurements of standard and crisp-texture southern highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L. interspecific hybrids)

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 94, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 2785-2793

  Blaker, Kendra M ^a   Plotto, Anne ^b   Baldwin, Elizabeth A ^b   Olmstead, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b U S HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioyield; Compression force; Firmness; Southern highbush blueberry; Texture; Vaccinium corymbosum

Indexed keywords

WATER;

CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROP; CROSS BREEDING; FOOD CONTROL; FOOD QUALITY; FRUIT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MECHANICS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TASTE; UNITED STATES; VACCINIUM;

CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; CROSSES, GENETIC; FLORIDA; FOOD INSPECTION; FOOD QUALITY; FRUIT; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSATION; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TASTE; VACCINIUM; WATER;

VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM;

EID: 84906943715     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6626     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brazelton C, World blueberry acreage and production. [Online]. Available: http://floridablueberrygrowers.com/?attachment_id=1335 [26 August 2013].
2. Paredes-López O, Cervantes-Ceja ML, Vigna-Pérez M and Hernández-Pérez T, Berries: improving human health and healthy aging, and promoting quality life - a review. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 65:299-308 (2010).
3. Lyrene P, Development of highbush blueberry cultivars adapted to Florida. J Am Pomol Soc 56:79-85 (2002).
4. Lyrene P, Breeding low-chill blueberries and peaches for subtropical areas. HortScience 40:1947-1949 (2005).
5. Okie WR, Register of new fruit and nut varieties list 39. HortScience 34:181-205 (1999).
6. Clark JR and Finn CE, Register of new fruit and nut cultivars: list 45. HortScience 45:716-756 (2010).
7. Scalzo J, Dierking S, Dierking W, Miller S, Edwards C and Alspach P, 'Hortblue Poppins': new cultivar for the home garden. Acta Hortic 810:157-162 (2009).
8. Mehra LK, MacLean DD, Savelle AT and Scherm H, Postharvest disease development on southern highbush blueberry fruit in relation to berry flesh type and harvest method.Plant Dis97:213-221 (2013).
9. Sargent SA, Berry AD, Williamson JG and Olmstead JW, Postharvest quality of mechanically and hand-harvested southern highbush blueberry fruit for fresh market. HortTechnology 23:437-441 (2013).
10. Takeda F, Krewer G, Li C, MacLean D and Olmstead JW, Techniques for increasing machine harvest efficiency in highbush blueberry. HortTechnology 23:430-436 (2013).
11. Harker RF, Redgwell RJ, Hallett IC and Murray SH, Texture of fresh fruit. Hortic Rev 20:121-224 (1997).
12. Saftner RA, Polashock JJ, Ehlenfeldt M and Vinyard B, Instrumental and sensory quality characteristics of blueberry fruit from twelve cultivars. Postharvest Biol Technol 49:19-26 (2008).
13. Strik B and Yarborough D, Production trends in North America, 1992 to 2003, and predictions for growth. HortTechnology 15:391-398 (2005).
14. Peterson DL, Wolford SD, Timm EJ and Takeda F, Fresh market quality blueberry harvester. Trans ASAE 40:535-540 (1997).
15. van Dalfsen KB and Gaye MM, Yield from hand and mechanical harvesting of highbush blueberries in British Columbia. Appl Eng Agric 15:393-398 (1999).
16. Takeda F, Krewer G, Andrews EL, Mullinix B and Peterson DL, Assessment of the v45 blueberry harvester on rabbiteye blueberry and southern highbush blueberry pruned to V-shaped canopy. HortTechnology 18:130-138 (2008).
17. Ehlenfeldt MK, Fruit firmness and holding ability in highbush blueberry: implications for mechanical harvesting. Int J Fruit Sci 5:83-91 (2005).
18. Olmstead JW, Rodríguez Armenta HP and Lyrene PM, Using sparkleberry as a genetic source for machine harvest traits for southern highbush blueberry. HortTechnology 23:419-424 (2013).
19. Worch T, Le S and Punter P, How reliable are the consumers? Comparison of sensory profiles from consumers and experts. Food Qual Prefer 21:309-318 (2010).
20. Silva JL, Marroquin E, Matta FB, Garner JO Jr and Stojanovic J, Physiochemical, carbohydrate and sensory characteristics of highbush and rabbiteye blueberry cultivars. J Sci Food Agric 85:1815-1821 (2005).
21. Ehlenfeldt MK and Martin RB Jr, A survey of fruit firmness in highbush blueberry and species-introgressed blueberry cultivars. HortScience 37:386-389 (2002).
22. Giongo L, Poncetta P, Loretti P and Costa F, Texture profiling of blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) during fruit development, ripening and storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 76:34-39 (2013).
23. King GJ, Maliepaard C, Lynn JR, Alston FH, Durel CE, Evans KM et al., Quantitative genetic analysis and comparison of physical and sensory descriptors relating to fruit flesh firmness in apple (Malus pumila Mill.). Theor Appl Genet 100:1074-1084 (2000).
24. Mann H, Bedford D and Luby J, Relationship of instrumental and sensory texture measurements of fresh and stored apples to cell number and size. HortScience 40:1815-1820 (2005).
25. Sato A, Yamane H, Hirakawa N, Otobe K and Yamada M, Varietal differences in the texture of grape berries measured by penetration tests. Vitis 36:7-10 (1997).
26. Sato A and Yamada M, Berry texture of table, wine, and dual-purpose grape cultivars quantified. HortScience 38:578-581 (2003).
27. Ross CF, Chauvin MA and Whiting M, Firmness evaluation of sweet cherries by a trained and consumer sensory panel. J Texture Stud 40:554-570 (2009).