Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy Integration

Environmental Policy and Governance

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 233-246

  Runhaar, Hens ^a   Driessen, Peter ^a   Uittenbroek, Caroline ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Climate policy integration; Environmental policy integration; Governance; Mainstreaming

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84906941086     PISSN: 1756932X     EISSN: 17569338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eet.1647     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adelle C, Russel D. 2013. Climate Policy Integration: a case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance 23(1): 1-12.
2. Ahmad IH. 2009. Climate Policy Integration: Towards Operationalization. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York.
3. Alvarado-Quesada I, Hein L, Weikard H-P. 2014. Market-based mechanisms for biodiversity conservation: a review of existing schemes and an outline for a global mechanism. Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 1-21.
4. Arts J, Runhaar HAC, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, van Laerhoven F, Driessen PPJ, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance - a comparison of 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 14(4) special issue on 25 years of EIA in the EU.
5. Betsill MM. 2001. Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles. Local Environment 6(4): 393-406.
6. Biesbroek GR, Klostermann JEM, Termeer CJAM, Kabat P. 2013. On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change 13(5): 1119-1129.
7. Bressers HTA. 2004. Implementing sustainable development: how to know what works, where, when and how? In Governing Sustainable Development: the Challenge of Adapting Form to Function, Lafferty WH (ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham; 284-318.
8. Brouwer S, Rayner T, Huitema D. 2013. Mainstreaming climate policy: the case of climate adaptation and the implementation of EU water policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31(1): 134-153.
9. Brukas V, Sallnäs O. 2012. Forest management plan as a policy instrument: carrot, stick or sermon? Land Use Policy 29(3): 605-613.
10. Bulkeley HA, Betsill MM. 2013. Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics 22(1): 136-154.
11. Chidiak M. 2002. Lessons from the French experience with voluntary agreements for greenhouse-gas reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production 10(2): 121-128.
12. Christie I, Rolfe H, Legard R. 1995. Cleaner Production in Industry. Policy Studies Institute: London.
13. Collier U, Löfstedt RE. 1997. Think globally, act locally? Local climate change and energy policies in Sweden and the UK. Global Environmental Change 7(1): 25-40.
14. Cunningham JA. 2006. Free riders and environmental voluntary approaches. Progress in Industrial Ecology 3(5): 487-507.
15. Driessen PPJ, Dieperink C, van Laerhoven F, Runhaar HAC, Vermeulen WJV. 2012. Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in environmental governance-Experiences from the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance 22(3): 143-160.
16. Driessen PPJ, Glasbergen P (eds). 2002. Greening Society. The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
17. Duncan R, Jordan A. 2010. Environmental policy integration in the UK. In Governance for the Environment. A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Policy Integration, Goria A, Sgobbi A (eds). Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham; 157-178.
18. Dupont C, Oberthür S. 2012. Insufficient climate policy integration in EU energy policy: the importance of the long-term perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Research 8(2): 228-247.
19. EEA. 1998. Europe's Environment: the Second Assessment. European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.
20. EEA. 2003. Europe's Environment: the Third Assessment. European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.
21. EEA. 2007. Europe's Environment: the Fourth Assessment. European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.
22. EEA. 2009a. Water Resources Across Europe-Confronting Water Scarcity and Drought. European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.
23. EEA. 2009b. European Community Emission Inventory Report 1990-2007 Under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.
24. EEA. 2009c. Annual European Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2007 and Inventory Report 2009. Submission to the UNFCCC Secretariat. European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.
25. Glasbergen P. 1992. Seven steps towards an instrumentation theory for environmental policy. Policy and Politics 20(3): 191-200.
26. Glasbergen P (ed.). 1998. Co-Operative Environmental Governance. Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy. Kluwer Publishers: Dordrecht.
27. Glasbergen P, Biermann F, Mol APJ (eds). 2007. Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development. Reflections on Theory and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham.
28. González-Benito J, González-Benito O. 2010. A study of determinant factors of stakeholder environmental pressure perceived by industrial companies. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(3): 164-181.
29. Granatstein D, Kupferman E. 2008. Sustainable horticulture in fruit production. Acta Horticulturae 767: 795-803.
30. Hajer M. 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 36: 175-195.
31. Hellegers P, van Ierland E. 2003. Policy instruments for groundwater management in the Netherlands. Environmental and Resource Economics 26: 163-172.
32. Henry AD, Dietz T. 2012. Understanding environmental cognition. Organization and Environment 25(3): 238-258.
33. Herodes M, Adelle C, Pallemaerts M. 2007. Environmental Policy Integration at the EU Level - a Literature Review. EPIGOV Paper No. 5. Ecologic Institute for International and European Environmental Policy: Berlin.
34. von Homeyer I. 2007. The Thematic Strategies: Governance for Environmental Policy Integration? EPIGOV Paper No. 8. Ecologic Institute for International and European Environmental Policy: Berlin. http://ecologic.eu.projekte/epigov/
35. Hysing E. 2009. From government to governance? A comparison of environmental governing in Swedish forestry and transport. Governance 22(4): 547-672.
36. Hysing E. 2010. Governing Towards Sustainability: Environmental Governance and Policy Change in Swedish Forestry and Transport, PhD thesis. Örebro University, Örebro.
37. Jacob K, Volkery A, Lenschow A. 2008. Strategies for environmental policy integration in 30 OECD countries. In Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainable Development, Jordan AJ, Lenschow A (eds). Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham; 24-45.
38. Jacob K, Volkery A. 2003. Potentials and limits for policy change through governmental self-regulation - the case of environmental policy integration. In Environmental Governance in Europe, Meuleman L, Niestroy I, Hey C (eds). Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment (RMNO): The Hague; 173-192.
39. Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27(4): 287-300.
40. Jordan A, Lenschow A. 2000. Greening the EU: what can we learn from the 'leaders' of EU environmental policy? European Environment 10(3): 109-120.
41. Jordan A, Lenschow A. 2010. Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance 20(3): 147-158.
42. Jordan A, Schout A, Unfried M. 2012. Policy coordination. In Environmental Policy in the EU: Actors, Institutions and Processes: 3rd edn, Jordan A, Adelle C (eds). Routledge: New York/London; 227-246.
43. Jordan AJ, Lenschow A (eds). 2008. Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
44. Kivimaa P, Mickwitz P. 2006. The challenge of greening technologies: environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Research Policy 35(5): 729-744.
45. Kousky C, Schneider SH. 2003. Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? Climate Policy 3(4): 359-372.
46. Lafferty WM, Hovden E. 2003. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics 12(3): 1-22.
47. Lafferty WM. 2004. From environmental protection to sustainable development: the challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. In Governance for Sustainable Development. The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function, Lafferty WM (ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham; 191-220.
48. Lafferty WM, Knudsen J. 2007. The Issue of 'Balance' and Trade-Offs in Environmental Policy Integration: How Will We Know EPI When We See it? EPIGOV Paper No. 11. Ecologic Institute for International and European Environmental Policy: Berlin. http://ecologic.eu.projekte/epigov/.
49. Lafferty WM, Knudsen J, Larsen OM. 2007. Pursuing sustainable development in Norway: the challenge of living up to Brundtland at home. European Environment 17(3): 177-188.
50. Lafferty WM, Ruud A. 2008. Introduction: promoting green electricity in Europe: the challenge of integrating contextual factors. In Promoting Sustainable Electricity in Europe: Challenging the Path Dependence of Dominant Energy Systems, Lafferty WM, Ruud A (eds). Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham; 1-44.
51. Lange P, Driessen PPJ, Sauer A, Bornemann B, Burger P. 2013. Governing towards sustainability-conceptualizing modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 15(3): 403-425.
52. Lenschow A 2005. New regulatory approaches in 'greening' EU policies. In Environmental Policy in the European Union, 2nd edn, Jordan A (ed.), Earthscan Publications: London; 295-316.
53. Lindseth G. 2004. The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCPC) and the framing of local climate policy. Local Environment 9(4): 325-336.
54. Lu Y, Zhu X, Cui, Q. 2012. Effectiveness and equity implications of carbon policies in the United States construction industry. Building and Environment 49(1): 259-269.
55. Massey E, Huitema D. 2013. The emergence of climate change adaptation as a policy field: the case of England. Regional Environmental Change 13(2): 341-352
56. Mickwitz P, Kivimaa P. 2007. Evaluating policy integration: the case of policies for environmentally friendlier technology innovations. Evaluation 13(1): 68-86.
57. Mickwitz P, Aix F, Beck S, Carss D, Nils Ferrand N, Görg C, Jensen A, Kivimaa P, Kuhlicke C, Kuindersma W, Máñez M, Melanen M, Monni S, Pedersen AB, Reinert H, van Bommel S. 2009. Climate Policy Integration, Coherence and Governance. PEER Report No. 2. Partnership for European Environmental Research: Helsinki.
58. Nilsson M. 2005. Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23(2): 207-226.
59. Nilsson M. 2006. The role of assessments and institutions for policy learning: a study on Swedish climate and nuclear policy formation. Policy Sciences 38(4): 225-249.
60. Nilsson M, Eckerberg K (eds). 2009. Environmental Policy Integration in Practice Shaping Institutions for Learning. Earthscan Publications: London.
61. Nilsson M, Pallemaerts M, von Homeyer I. 2009. International regimes and environmental policy integration: introducing the special issue. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 9(4): 337-350.
62. Nilsson M, Persson Å. 2003. Framework for analysing environmental policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 5(4): 333-359.
63. Nunan F. 1999. Barriers to the use of voluntary agreements: a case study of the development of packaging waste regulations in the UK. European Environment 9(6): 238-224.
64. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
65. Pallemaerts M, Wilkinson D, Bowyer C, Brown J, Farmer A, Farmer M, Herodes M, Hjerp P, Miller C, Monkhouse C, Skinner I, ten Brink P, Adelle C. 2006. Drowning in Process? The Implementation of the EU's 6th Environmental Action Programme. Institute for European Environmental Policy: London.
66. Persson Å. 2004. Environmental Policy Integration: an Introduction. PINTS Policy Integration for Sustainability Background Paper. Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm.
67. Persson Å, Klein RJT. 2009. Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in Official Development Assistance: challenges to foreign policy integration. In Climate Change and Foreign Policy: Case Studies from East to West, Harris P (ed.). Routledge: London; 162-177.
68. Pierre D (ed.). 2000. Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
69. Pressman J, Wildavsky A. 1973. How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland or Why It's Amazing That Federal Programs Work at all. University of California Press: Berkeley.
70. Runhaar H, Driessen PPJ, Soer L. 2009. Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration. An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B 36(3): 417-431.
71. Runhaar H, Lafferty H. 2009. Governing corporate social responsibility: an assessment of the contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR strategies in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Business Ethics 84(4): 479-495.
72. Runhaar H, Tigchelaar C, Vermeulen WJV. 2008. Environmental leaders: making a difference. A typology of environmental leaders and recommendations for a differentiated policy approach. Business Strategy and the Environment 17(3): 160-178.
73. Russel D, Benson A. 2013. Green budgeting in an age of austerity: a transatlantic comparative perspective. Environmental Politics 54: 1-20.
74. Schout A, Jordan A. 2007. EU-EPI, Policy Co-Ordination and New Institutionalism. EPIGOV Paper No. 13. Ecologic Institute for International and European Environmental Policy: Berlin. http://ecologic.eu.projekte/epigov/.
75. Söderberg C. 2011. Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policy integration in Swedish bioenergy policy. Environmental Politics 20(4): 528-546.
76. Stead D, Geerlings H. 2005. Integrating transport, land use planning and environmental policy. Views of practitioners from Denmark, England and Germany. Innovations 18(4): 443-453.
77. Stead D, Meijers E. 2009. Spatial planning and policy integration: concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory and Practitioners 10(3): 317-332.
78. Steurer R, Hametner M. 2013. Objectives and indicators in sustainable development strategies: Similarities and variances across Europe. Sustainable Development 21(4): 224-241.
79. Thompson G, Frances J, Levacic R, Mitchell J. 1991. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: the Coordination of Social Life. Sage Publications: London.
80. Turnpenny J, Radaelli CM, Jordan A, Jacob K. 2009. The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions. Journal of European Public Policy 16(4): 640-653.
81. Uittenbroek CJ, Janssen-Jansen LB, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies. Regional Environmental Change 13(2): 399-411.
82. van Tatenhove J, Goverde H. 2007. Institutionalisering van het Nederlandse milieubeleid. In Milieubeleid. Analyse en perspectief, Driessen P, Leroy P (eds). Coutinho: Bussum 51-74.
83. Vedung E. 1998. Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In Carrots, Sticks and Sermons. Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, Bemelmans-Videc ML, Rist RC, Vedung E (eds). Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick, NJ; 21-58.
84. Visseren-Hamakers IJ. 2009. Partnerships in Biodiversity Governance. An Assessment of Their Contributions to Halting Biodiversity Loss. PhD Thesis. Utrecht University, KNAG/Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht.
85. Ward H, Cao X. 2012. Domestic and international influences on green taxation. Comparative Political Studies 45(9): 1075-1103.
86. Weber M, Driessen PPJ. 2010. Environmental policy integration: the role of policy windows in the integration of noise and spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28(6): 1120-1134.
87. Webler T, Renn O. 1995. A brief primer on participation, philosophy and practice. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds). Kluwer Publishers: Dordrecht; 17-34.
88. Weible CM, Sabatier PA, McQueen K. 2009. Themes and variations. Taking stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 121-140.
89. Wejs A. 2014. Integrating climate change into governance at the municipal scale: an institutional perspective on practices in Denmark. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy (in press).
90. Wejs A, Cashmore M. 2014. Constructing legitimacy for climate change planning: a study of local government in Denmark. Global Environmental Change (in press).
91. Wejs A, Harvold K, Larsen SV, Saglie IL. 2014. Legitimacy building under weak institutional settings: Climate change adaptation at the local level in Denmark and Norway. Environmental Politics (paper in press).
92. Wilkinson D. 2007. Environmental Policy Integration at EU level: state-of-the-art report for the EPIGOV Project. Ecologic: Berlin. http://ecologic.eu.projekte/epigov/
93. Yeoh H. 2009. Sustainable banking: the commercial and legal impacts of private self-regulatory initiatives. European Energy and Environmental Law Review 18(6): 274-288.