Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policy integration in Swedish bioenergy policy

Environmental Politics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 528-546

  Söderberg, Charlotta ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bioenergy introduction; Environmental policy integration; Institutions; Multi sector EPI; Policy coordination

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOENERGY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; KNOWLEDGE; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

SWEDEN;

EID: 79960821904     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.589625     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Börjesson, P. and Berndes, G., 2004. The prospects for willow plantations for wastewater treatment in Sweden. Biomass & Bioenergy, 30 (3), 428-438.
2. Collier, D. and Collier, R.B., 2002. Shaping the political arena: critical junctures, the labor movement and regime dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
3. Connelly, J. and Smith, G., 1999, Politics and the environment: from theory to practice. London: Routledge.
4. Dryzek, J.S., 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Dryzek, J.S. and Niemeyer, S., 2006. Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50 (3), 634-649.
6. Ds 1989:63. Jordbruksdepartementet: En ny livsmedelspolitik. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.
7. Ds 1996:55. Energikommissionens betänkande: Omställning av energisystemet. Stockholm: Fritzes.
8. EC, 2000. Towards a European Strategy for the security of energy supply, COM (2000) 769 final of 29/11/00. Green paper. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
9. EC, 2002. Commission of the European Communities (2002) communication: mid-term review of the Common Agricultural Policy, COM (2002) 394 final of 10/07/02.
10. EC, 2003. Commission of the European Communities (2003) proposal: 'for a council regulation on establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and', COM (2003) 23 final of 21/01/03.
11. EC, 2005. Biomass action plan, COM (2005) 628 final of 7/12/05. Communication. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
12. EC, 2008. Commission of the European Communities (2008) regulation proposal 'establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy', COM (2008) 306/4.
13. EEA, 2005. Environmental policy integration in Europe. State of play and an evaluation framework. EEA Technical Report, No 2. Copenhagen: EEA.
14. EEA, 2006. How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? European Environment Agency report 07/2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
15. EP and C, 2003. Official Journal of the European Communities L123 42-46, 17 May.
16. Gerger-Swartling, A., et al., 2007. Theory and methodology for EPI analysis. In: M. Nilsson and K. Eckerberg, eds. Environmental policy integration in practice. London: Earthscan, 49-66.
17. Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R., 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44 (5), 936-957.
18. Hajer, M.A., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Hertin, J. and Berkhout, F., 2003. Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration: the case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5 (1), 39-56.
20. IPCC, 2007. Fourth assessment report: climate change 2007 (AR4). Geneva: IPCP.
21. Jordan, A., 2002. Efficient hardware and light green software: environmental policy integration in the UK. In: A. Lenschow, ed. Environmental policy integration: greening sectoral policies in Europe. London: Earthscan, 35-56.
22. Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A., 2008. Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
23. Jordan, A. and Schout, A., 2006. The coordination of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Kingdon, J., 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.
25. Lafferty, W.M., 2004. From environmental protection to sustainable development: the challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. In: W.M. Lafferty, ed. Governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 191-220.
26. Lafferty, W.M. and Hovden, E., 2003. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12 (3), 1-22.
27. Lafferty, W.M., Mosvold Larsen, O. and Ruud, A., 2004a. Institutional provisions for environmental policy integration. ProSus Working Paper no. 2/04. Oslo: ProSus, University of Oslo.
28. Lafferty, W.M., Ruud, A. and Mosvold Larsen, O., 2004b. Environmental policy integration: how will we recognize it when we see it? ProSus Working Paper no. 3/04. Oslo: ProSus, University of Oslo.
29. Lenschow, A., 1999. The greening of the EU: the common agricultural policy and the structural funds. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 17 (1), 91-108.
30. Lenschow, A., ed., 2002. Environmental policy integration: greening sectoral policies in Europe. London: Earthscan.
31. Lenschow, A. and Zito, A., 1998. Blurring or shifting of policy frames? Institutionalization of the economic-environmental policy linkage in the European Community. Governance, 11 (4), 415-442.
32. Lowndes, V., 2002. Institutionalism. In: D. Marsh and G. Stoker, eds. Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 90-108.
33. LRF and SCB, 2001. Miljöredovisning för svenskt jordbruk 2000. Stockolm: Lantbrukarnas Riksföbund, LRF.
34. Lundqvist, L.J., 2004. Sweden and ecological governance: straddling the fence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
35. Meijers, E. and Stead, D., 2004. Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review. Conference paper at the 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies - Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin, 3-4 December.
36. Nilsson, M., 2005. Learning, frames and environmental policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy 2005, 23 (2), 207-226.
37. Nilsson, M. and Eckerberg, K., eds., 2007. Environmental policy integration in practice. London: Earthscan.
38. Nilsson, M. and Persson, A., 2003. Framework for analysing environmental policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5 (4), 333-359.
39. North, D.C., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Official Journal of the European Communities (OJ), 1992a. Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside L 215/85 (30 July).
41. OJ, 1992b. Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 of 30 June 1992 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops L 181/12 (1 July).
42. OJ, 2006. Council Regulation (EC) No 319/2006 of 20 February 2006 Amending Regulation No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers and establishing certain support schemes for farmers L 58/32 (28 February).
43. OJ, 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC L 140/16 (5 June).
44. Ostrom, E., 1999. Institutional rational choice. In: P.A. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. Oxford: Westview, 27-64.
45. Persson, A., 2007. Different perspectives on EPI. In: M. Nilsson and K. Eckerberg, eds. Environmental policy integration in practice. London: Earthscan, 25-47.
46. Peters, G., 1998. Managing horizontal government: the politics of coordination. Public Administration, 76, 295-311.
47. Pierson, P., 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94 (2), 251-267.
48. Prop. 1989/90:90. Forskning. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
49. Prop. 1989/90:146. Om livsmedelspolitiken. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
50. Prop. 1990/91:88. Om energipolitiken. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
51. Prop. 1991/92:97. Om främjande av biobränsleanvändningen. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
52. Prop. 1992/93:179. Om åtgärder mot klimatpåverkan, m.m. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
53. Prop. 1993/94:236. Vissa jordbrukspolitiska frågor. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
54. Prop. 1996/97:1. Förslag till statsbudget för budgetåret 1997, m.m. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
55. Prop. 1996/97:84. En uthållig energiförsörjning. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
56. Prop. 1997/98:2. Hållbart fiske och jordbruk. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
57. Prop. 1997/98:145. Svenska miljömål. Miljöpolitik för ett hållbart Sverige. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
58. Prop. 1999/2000:134. Ekonomiska förutsättningar för elproduktion från förnybara energikällor. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
59. Prop. 2001/02:143. Samverkan för en trygg, effektiv och miljövänlig energiförsörjning. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
60. Prop. 2006/07:6. Regeringsförklaring, Riksdagens protokoll 6 oktober 2006. Stockholm: Riksdagen.
61. Prop. 2008/09:163. En sammanhållen klimatoch energipolitik. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
62. Regeringskansliet, 2000. The environmental and rural development plan for Sweden 2000-2006. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.
63. Regeringskansliet, 2007. Rural development programme for Sweden - the period 2007- 2013. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.
64. Regeringskansliet, 2009. En hållbar energioch klimatpolitik för miljö, konkurrenskraft och trygghet. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet. Available from: http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/12/00/82/4932050pdf [Accessed 20 February 2009].
65. Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, H.C., 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: P.A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of the policy process. Oxford: Westview, 117-166.
66. SCB, 2001. Yearly energy balance sheets 1998-1999. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
67. SCB, 2002. Yearbook of agricultural statistics 2002. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
68. SCB, 2003. Yearly energy balance sheets 2000-2001. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
69. SCB, 2006. Yearbook of agricultural statistics 2006. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
70. SCB, 2007a. Yearly energy balance sheets 2005-2006. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
71. SCB, 2007b. Yearbook of agricultural statistics 2007. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
72. SCB, 2008. Yearly energy balance sheets 2006-2007. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
73. SCB, 2009a. Yearly energy balance sheets 2007-2008. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
74. SCB, 2009b. Yearbook of agricultural statistics 2009. Örebro: Statistics Sweden.
75. Skr., 1997/98:13. Hållbara Sverige - uppföljning och åtgärder för en ekologiskt hållbar utveckling. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
76. Skr., 2000/01:38. Hållbara Sverige - uppföljning och fortsatta ätgärder för en ekologiskt hållbar utveckling. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
77. Skr., 2001/02:50. Hållbara Sverige - uppföljning och fortsatta ätgärder för en ekologiskt hållbar utveckling. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
78. Smith, G., 2001. Taking deliberation seriously: institutional design and green politics. Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 72-93.
79. Söderberg, C., 2008. 'Much ado about nothing?' Energy forest cultivation in Sweden: how intersectoral policy coordination affects outcomes from EPI in multisectoral issues. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, (10) 4, 381-403.
80. SOU, 1987:44. Livsmedelspriser och livsmedelskvalitet. Betänkande av 1986 års livsmedelsutredning. Stockolm: Allmänna Fölaget.
81. SOU, 1990:87. Den nya centrala jordbruksmyndigheten. Slutbetänkande av utredningen om översyn av den centrala myndighetsorganisationen på jordbrukets område m.m. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.
82. SOU, 1991:93. El frän biobränslen. Delbetänkande av biobränslekommissionen. Stockholm: Allmänna Fö rlaget.
83. SOU, 1992:90. Biobränslen för framtiden. Slutbetänkande av Biobränslekommissionen. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.
84. SOU, 1995:139. Omställning av energisystemet. Slutbetänkande av Energikommissionen. Stockholm: Fritzes.
85. SOU, 1996:184. Bättre klimat, miljö och hälsa med alternativa drivmedel. Betänkande av Alternativbränsleutredningen. Stockholm: Fritzes.
86. SOU, 2001:77. Handel med elcertifikat - ett nytt sätt att främja el från förnybara energikällor. Stockholm: Fritzes.
87. SOU, 2003:80. EFUD - en del i omställningen i energisystemet. Betänkande av LångEnutredningen. Stockholm: Fritzes.
88. SOU, 2008:24. Svensk klimatpolitik. Betänkande av Klimatberedningen. Stockholm: Fritzes.
89. Stern, N., 2007. The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Swedish Energy Agency (SEA), 2003. Uppdrag att utvärdera förutsättningarna för fortsatt marknadsintroduktion av energiskogsodling. Slutrapport 2003-04-28. Eskilstuna: Energimyndigheten.
91. Swedish Energy Agency (SEA) and Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), 1989. Ett miljöanpassat energisystem. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget.
92. Thelen, K., 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369-404.
93. True, J.L., Jones, B.D. and Baumgartner, F.R., 2007. Punctuated-equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In: P.A. Sababatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 155-187.
94. WCED, 1987. Our common future. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95. Woodhouse, E.J. and Lindblom, C.E., 1993. The policy-making process. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
96. Young, O.R., 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. Zwart, I., 2003. A greener alternative? Deliberative democracy meets local government. Environmental Politics, 12 (2), 23-48.