Understanding Environmental Cognition

Organization and Environment

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 238-258

  Henry, Adam Douglas ^a   Dietz, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

advocacy coalition framework; belief systems; cognition; environmental policy; values; values beliefs norms theory

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84867667180     PISSN: 10860266     EISSN: 15527417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1086026612456538     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ajzen I.The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:172-211.
2. Ajzen I.,Fishbein M.Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980:.
3. Allessa L.,Bennett S. M.,Kliskey A. D.Effects of knowledge, personal attribution and perception of ecosystem health on depreciative behaviors in the intertidal zone of Pacific Rim National Park and Reserve.Journal of Environmental Management. 2003;68:207-218.
4. Andersson L. M.,Bateman T. S.Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations.Academy of Management Journal. 2000;43:548-570.
5. Bansal P.From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values.Organization Science. 2003;14:510-526.
6. Berkhout T.,Rowlands I. H.The voluntary adoption of green electricity by Ontario-based companies: The importance of organizational values and organizational context.Organization & Environment. 2007;20:281-303.
7. Bollen K. A.Structural equation models with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley; 1989:.
8. Caprara G. V.,Schwartz S. H.,Capanna C.,Vecchione M.,Barbaranelli C.Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice.Political Psychology. 2006;27:1-28.
9. Cline S. A.,Collins A. R.Watershed associations in West Virginia: Their impact on environmental protection.Journal of Environmental Management. 2003;67:373-383.
10. Dietz T."What should we do?" Human ecology and collective decision making.Human Ecology Review. 1994;1:301-309.
11. Dietz T.The Darwinian trope in the drama of the commons: Variations on some themes by the Ostroms.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2005;57:205-225.
12. Dietz T.,Dan A.,Shwom R.Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences.Rural Sociology. 2007;72:185-214.
13. Dietz T.,Fitzgerald A.,Shwom R.Environmental values.Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2005;30:335-372.
14. Dietz T.,Stern P. C.Toward a theory of choice: Socially embedded preference construction.Journal of Socio-Economics. 1995;24:261-279.
15. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Dietz T.Stern P. C., ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2008:.
16. Dietz T.,Stern P. C.,Guagnano G. A.Social structural and social psychological bases on environmental concern.Environment and Behavior. 1998;30:450-471.
17. Dunlap R. E.The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From marginality to worldwide use.Journal of Environmental Education. 2008;40:3-18.
18. Dunlap R. E.,Van Liere K. D.The "New Environmental Paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results.Journal of Environmental Education. 1978;9:10-19.
19. Dunlap R. E.,Van Liere K. D.,Mertig A. G.,Jones R. E.New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale.Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56:425-442.
20. Guber D. L.Environmental concern and the dimensionality problem: A new approach to an old predicament.Social Science Quarterly. 1996;77:644-662.
21. Heberlein T. A.Norm activation and environmental action.Journal of Social Issues. 1977;33:79-87.
22. Henry A. D.The challenge of learning for sustainability: A prolegomenon to theory.Human Ecology Review. 2009;16:131-140.
23. Henry A. D.Ideology, power, and the structure of policy networks.Policy Studies Journal. 2011a;39:361-383.
24. Henry A. D.Belief-oriented segregation in policy networks.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011b;22:14-25.
25. Henry A. D.,Lubell M.,McCoy M.Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of california regional planning.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2011;21:419-444.
26. Henry A. D.,Lubell M.,McCoy M.Survey-based measurement of public management and policy networks.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2012;31:432-452.
27. Henry A. D.,Pralat P.,Zhang C.-Q.Emergence of segregation in evolving social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108:8605-8610.
28. Hoffman A. J.,Henn R.Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building.Organization & Environment. 2008;21:390-419.
29. Howard-Grenville J. A.Inside the "black box": How organizational culture and subcultures inform interpretations and actions on environmental issues.Organization & Environment. 2006;19:46-73.
30. Inglehart R.The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1977:.
31. Inglehart R.Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990:.
32. Inglehart R.Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies.PS: Political Science and Politics. 1995;15:57-71.
33. Inglehart R.Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1997:.
34. Ingold K.Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy.Policy Studies Journal. 2011;39:435-459.
35. Innes J. M.Selective exposure as a function of dogmatism and incentive.Journal of Social Psychology. 1978;196:261-265.
36. Jones R. E.,Dunlap R. E.The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time.Rural Sociology. 1992;57:28-47.
37. Kahneman D.Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux; 2011:.
38. Kates R. W.,Clark W. C.,Corell R.,Hall J. M.,Jaeger C. C.,Lowe I.,Svedlin U.Environment and development. Sustainability science.Science. 2001;292:641-642.
39. Lackey R. T.Axioms of ecological policy.Fisheries. 2006;31:286-290.
40. Leach W. D.,Sabatier P. A.To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking.American Political Science Review. 2005;99:491-503.
41. Li T.,Wehr K.The validity of the factor structure of the general social survey environmentalism scales across gender and ethnicity in the United States: Importance of looking at group differences.Organization & Environment. 2007;20:367-385.
42. Lord C. G.,Ross L.,Lepper M. R.Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:2098-2109.
43. Manring S. L.Creating and managing interorganizational learning networks to achieve sustainable ecosystem management.Organization & Environment. 2007;20:325-346.
44. Marquart-Pyatt S. T.Contextual influences on environmental concern cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation.Social Science Research. in press.
45. Marsden P. V.Network data and measurement.Annual Review of Sociology. 1990;16:435-463.
46. Marsden P. V.Models and methods in social network analysis. Carrington P. J.Scott J.Wasserman S., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2005:8-30.
47. Matti S.,Sandström A.The rationale determining advocacy coalitions: Examining coordination networks and corresponding beliefs.Policy Studies Journal. 2011;39:385-410.
48. McCormick S.The Brazilian anti-dam movement: Knowledge contestation as communicative action.Organization & Environment. 2006;19:321-346.
49. Munro G. D.,Ditto P. H.Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientific information.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997;23:636-653.
50. Munro G. D.,Ditto P. H.,Lockhart L. K.,Fagerlin A.,Gready M.,Peterson E.Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. Presidential debate.Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2002;24 (1): 15-26.
51. Nohrstedt D.External shocks and policy change: Three Mile Island and Swedish nuclear energy policy.Journal of European Public Policy. 2005;12:1041-1059.
52. Parson E. A.,Clark W. C.Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Gunderson L. H.Holling C. S.Light S. S., ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1995:428-460.
53. Pierce J.C.,Lovrich N.P.Belief systems concerning the environment: The general public, attentive publics, and state legislators.Political Behavior. 1980;2:259-286.
54. Pierce J. C.,Lovirch N. P.,Tsurutani T.,Abe T.Environmental belief systems among Japanese and American elites and publics.Political Behavior. 1987a;9:139-159.
55. Pierce J. C.,Lovrich N. P.,Tsurutani T.,Abe T.Environmental policy elites' trust of information sources: Japan and the United States.American Behavioral Scientist. 1987b;30:578-596.
56. Pierce J. C.,Tsurutani T.,Lovrich N. P.,Abe T.Vanguards and rearguards in environmental politics: A comparison of activists in Japan and the United States.Comparative Political Studies. 1986;18:419-447.
57. Rokeach M.Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1968:.
58. Rokeach M.The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press; 1973:.
59. Rokeach M.Understanding human values. Rokeach M., ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1979a:47-70.
60. Understanding human values: Individual and societal. Rokeach M., ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1979b:.
61. Sabatier P. A.The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe.Journal of European Public Policy. 1998;5 (1): 98-130.
62. Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Sabatier P. A.Focht W.Lubell M.Trachtenberg Z.Vedlitz A.Matlock M., ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005:.
63. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Sabatier P. A.Jenkins-Smith H., ed. Boulder, CO: Westview; 1993:.
64. Sabatier P. A.,Jenkins-Smith H. C.Theories of the policy process. Sabatier P. A., ed. Boulder, CO: Westview; 1999:117-166.
65. Sabatier P. A.,Weible C. M.Theories of the policy process. 2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In SabatierP. A. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 189-220). Boulder, CO: Westview.Sabatier P. A., ed. Boulder, CO: Westview; 2007:189-220.
66. Schwartz S. H.Awareness of consequences and the influence of moral norms on interpersonal behavior.Sociometry. 1968a;31:355-369.
67. Schwartz S. H.Words, deeds and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1968b;10:232-242.
68. Schwartz S. H.Altruism and helping behavior. Macauley J.Berkowitz L., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1970:127-141.
69. Schwartz S. H.Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal and empirical test.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1973;9:349-364.
70. Schwartz S. H.Advances in experimental social psychology. Berkowitz L., ed. Orlando, FL: Academic; 1977:221-279.
71. Schwartz S. H.Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1992;25:1-65.
72. Schwartz S. H.Studying values: Personal adventure, future directions.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2011;42:307-319.
73. Schwartz S. H.,Bardi A.Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe.Political Psychology. 1997;18:385-410.
74. Schwartz S. H.,Bilsky W.Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987;53:550-562.
75. Schwartz S. H.,Bilsky W.Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;58:878-891.
76. Schwartz S. H.,Caprara G. V.,Vecchione M.Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis.Political Psychology. 2010;31:421-452.
77. Schwartz S. H.,Sagie G.Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2000;31:465-497.
78. Slimak M. W.,Dietz T.Personal values, beliefs and ecological risk perception.Risk Analysis. 2006;26:1689-1705.
79. Steger M. A. E.,Pierce J. C.,Steel B. S.,Lovrich N. P.Political culture, postmaterial values, and the new environmental paradigm: A comparative analysis of Canada and the United States.Political Behavior. 1989;11:233-254.
80. Stern P. C.Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56:407-242.
81. Stern P. C.,Dietz T.,Abel T.,Guagnano G. A.,Kalof L.A social psychological theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism.Human Ecology Review. 1999;6:81-97.
82. Stern P. C.,Dietz T.,Black J. S.Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms.Population and Environment. 1986;8:204-222.
83. Stern P. C.,Dietz T.,Guagnano G. A.The new environmental paradigm in social psychological perspective.Environment & Behavior. 1995;27:723-745.
84. Stern P. C.,Dietz T.,Guagnano G. A.A brief inventory of values.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1998;58:884-1001.
85. Stern P. C.,Dietz T.,Kalof L.Value orientations, gender and environmental concern.Environment & Behavior. 1993;25:322-348.
86. Stets J. E.,Biga C. F.Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology.Sociological Theory. 2003;21:398-423.
87. Szasz A.Shopping our way to safety: How we changed from protecting the environment to protecting ourselves. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2007:.
88. Weible C. M.Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: An advocacy coalition approach to policy networks.Political Research Quarterly. 2005;58:461-475.
89. Weible C. M.,Sabatier P. A.Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California.Policy Studies Journal. 2005;33:181-201.
90. Weible C. M.,Sabatier P. A.,McQueen K.Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework.Policy Studies Journal. 2009;37:121-140.
91. Whitfield S.,Rosa E. A.,Dietz T.,Dan A.The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perceptions.Risk Analysis. 2009;29:425-437.
92. Xiao C.,Dunlap R. E.Validating a comprehensive model of environmental concern cross-nationally: A U.S.-Canadian comparison.Social Science Quarterly. 2007;88:471-493.
93. Xiao C.,McCright A. M.Environmental concern and sociodemographic variables: A study of statistical models.Journal of Environmental Education. 2007;38:3-14.