Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: Evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center

Spine Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2078-2084

  Wang, Jian ^a   Zhou, Yue ^a  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Complications; Degenerative lumbar diseases; Minimally invasive surgery; Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Spine surgery; Spondylolisthesis

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENDOSCOPE; EPIDURAL HEMATOMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR FUSION; NERVE COMPRESSION; PEDICLE SCREW; PEDICLE SCREW MALPOSITION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETRACTOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE INSTABILITY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STOMACH HEMORRHAGE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION; WOUND INFECTION; BACK; INCIDENCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84906939219     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: 18781632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. J.D. Schwender, L.T. Holly, and D.P. Rouben et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results J Spinal Disord Tech 18 Suppl 2005 S1 S6
2. R.E. Isaacs, V.K. Podichetty, and P. Santiago et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation J Neurosurg Spine 3 2005 98 105
3. K.M. Scheufler, H. Dohmen, and V.I. Vougioukas Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability Neurosurgery 60 2007 203 212
4. B.M. Ozgur, K. Yoo, and G. Rodriguez et al. Minimally invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) Eur Spine J 14 2005 887 894
5. Benzel EC, Anonymous Preface. Spine surgery: techniques, complication avoidance, and management 1999 Churchill Livingstone New York, NY xviii xvxix
6. A. Hamilton, E.C. Benzel, and Anonymous Preface. Spine surgery: techniques, complication avoidance, and management 1999 Churchill Livingstone New York, NY xix
7. N. Patel, B. Bagan, and S. Vadera et al. Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications J Neurosurg Spine 6 2007 291 297
8. B. Lebude, S. Yadla, and T. Albert et al. Defining " complications" in spine surgery. Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Spine Surgeons' Survey J Spinal Disord Tech 23 2010 492 500
9. F.A. Ibanez, S. Hem, and P. Ajler et al. A new classification of complications in neurosurgery World Neurosurg 75 2011 709 715
10. J. Wang, Y. Zhou, and Z.F. Zhang et al. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2 Eur Spine J 19 2010 1780 1784
11. J. Wang, Y. Zhou, and Z.F. Zhang et al. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine Eur Spine J 20 2011 623 628
12. A.A. White, R.M. Johnson, and M.M. Panjabi et al. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine Clin Orthop Relat Res 109 1975 85 96
13. W.H. Kirkaldy-Willis Presidential symposium on instability of the lumbar spine. Introduction Spine 10 1985 254
14. A.A. White III, and M.M. Panjabi The problem of clinical instability in the human spine: a systemic approach. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine 1978 JB Lippincott Philadelphia, PA 191 276
15. F.L. Acosta, J.M. Cloyd, H.E. Aryan, and C.P. Ames Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes of multilevel circumferential lumbar spinal fusion in the elderly J Clin Neurosci 16 2009 69 73
16. T. Faciszewski, R.B. Winter, and J.E. Lonstein et al. The surgical and medical perioperative complications of anteriorspinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults. A review of 1223 procedures Spine 20 1995 1592 1599
17. T. Fujita, J.P. Kostuik, and C.B. Huckell et al. Complications of spinal fusion in adult patients more than 60 years of age Orthop Clin North Am 29 1998 669 678
18. M.J. Perez-Cruet, R.G. Fessler, and N.I. Perin Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery Neurosurgery 51 2 Suppl 2002 26 36
19. A.A. Scaduto, S.C. Gamradt, and W.D. Yu et al. Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach J Spinal Disord Tech 16 2003 502 507
20. Y.R. Rampersaud, E. Moro, and M.A. Neary et al. Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols Spine 31 2006 1503 1510
21. E.M. Baron, and T.J. Albert Medical complications of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity and how to avoid them Spine 19S 2006 106 118
22. A.A. Faundez, J.D. Schwender, and Y. Safriel et al. Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients Eur Spine J 18 2009 203 211
23. M.B. Dekutoski, D.C. Norvell, and J.R. Dettori et al. Surgeons' perceptions and reported complications in spine surgery Spine 35 Suppl 2010 S9 S21
24. M. Krishna, R.D. Pollock, and C. Bhatia Incidence, etiology, classification, and management of neuralgia after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in 226 patients Spine J 8 2008 374 379
25. C.J. Powers, V.K. Podichetty, and R.E. Isaacs Placement of percutaneous pedicle screws without imaging guidance Neurosurg Focus 20 2006 E3
26. C. Schizas, J. Michel, and V. Kosmopoulos et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization Eur Spine J 16 2007 613 617
27. F. Ringel, M. Stoffel, and C. Stuer et al. Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine Neurosurgery 59 2006 ONS361 ONS366
28. C.W. Peng, W.M. Yue, and S.Y. Poh et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Spine 34 2009 1385 1389
29. P. Park, C. Upadhyaya, and H.J. Garton et al. The impact of minimally invasive spine surgery on perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients Neurosurgery 62 2008 693 699
30. R.H. Wu, J.F. Fraser, and R. Hartl Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates Spine 35 2010 2273 2281
31. M.J. Tormenti, M.B. Maserati, and C.M. Bonfield et al. Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience J Neurosurg Spine 16 2012 44 50
32. S.W. Fan, X. Zhao, and F.D. Zhao et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases Spine 35 2010 1615 1620
33. B. Bagan, N. Patel, and H. Deutsch et al. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques Surg Technol Int 17 2008 281 286
34. A.T. Villavicencio, S. Burneikiene, and C.M. Roeca et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Surg Neurol Int 1 2010 12
35. D. Lau, J.G. Lee, and S.J. Han et al. Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) J Clin Neurosci 18 2011 624 627
36. N.E. Epstein How often is minimally invasive minimally effective: what are the complication rates for minimally invasive surgery? Surg Neurol 70 2008 386 389
37. D.R. Fourney, J.R. Dettori, and D.C. Norvell et al. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion? Spine 35 2010 S57 S65
38. K.S. Chaudhary, and M.W. Groff Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spine Tech Orthop 26 2011 146 155