Sepsis and 'superbugs': Should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy?

BJU International

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 384-388

  Grummet, Jeremy P ^a,b,d,e   Weerakoon, Mahesha ^b   Huang, Sean ^a   Lawrentschuk, Nathan ^b,c   Frydenberg, Mark ^b,d,e   Moon, Daniel A ^b,d,e   O'Reilly, Mary ^d,e   Murphy, Declan ^b,c  

^a ALFRED HEALTH   (Australia)

^b EPWORTH HEALTHCARE   (Australia)

^c PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^d CABRINI INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^e MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

infection; prostate; sepsis; transperineal biopsy; transrectal biopsy

Indexed keywords

AMIKACIN; AMOXICILLIN PLUS CLAVULANIC ACID; CEFALEXIN; CEPHALOSPORIN; GENTAMICIN; LEVOFLOXACIN; METRONIDAZOLE; NORFLOXACIN; QUINOLINE DERIVED ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; QUINOLONE; SULBACTAM;

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOPSY; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INFECTION RATE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SEPSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSPERINEAL BIOPSY; TRANSRECTAL BIOPSY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY GUIDED BIOPSY; WATCHFUL WAITING;

INFECTION; PROSTATE; SEPSIS; TRANSPERINEAL BIOPSY; TRANSRECTAL BIOPSY;

AGED; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOPSY; DRUG RESISTANCE, MULTIPLE, BACTERIAL; ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT READMISSION; PERINEUM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RISK FACTORS; SEPSIS;

EID: 84906934171     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12536     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wagenlehner FM, van Oostrum E, Tenke P, et al. Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 521-527
2. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA,. Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 66-70 (Pubitemid 19184005)
3. Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, et al. Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2013; 189 (Suppl.): S12-18
4. Cuevas O, Oteo J, Lazaro E, et al. Significant ecological impact on the progression of fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli with increased community use of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 664-669
5. Kotsanas D, Wijesooriya WR, Korman TM, et al. 'Down the drain': carbapenem-resistant bacteria in intensive care unit patients and handwashing sinks. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 267-269
6. Drew RJ, Turton JF, Hill RL, et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a UK paediatric hospital. J Hosp Infect 2013; 84: 300-304
7. Pepe P, Aragona F,. Morbidity after transperineal prostate biopsy in 3000 patients undergoing 12 vs 18 vs more than 24 needle cores. Urology 2013; 81: 1142-1146
8. Vyas L, Acher P, Challacombe B, et al. Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases. BJU Int 2013; doi: 10.1111/bju.12282 [Epub ahead of print]
9. Symons JL, Huo A, Yuen CL, et al. Outcomes of transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients. BJU Int 2013; 112: 585-593
10. Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Seidenader J, et al. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2013; 190: 1380-1386
11. Ekwueme K, Simpson H, Zakhour H, Parr NJ,. Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy using a modified technique: outcome of 270 cases requiring repeat prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2013; 111: E365-373
12. Dimmen M, Vlatkovic L, Hole KH, Nesland JM, Brennhovd B, Axcrona K,. Transperineal prostate biopsy detects significant cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative transrectal biopsies. BJU Int 2012; 110: E69-75
13. Pal RP, Elmussareh M, Chanawani M, Khan MA,. The role of a standardized 36 core template-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy technique in patients with previously negative transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. BJU Int 2012; 109: 367-371
14. Suzuki M, Kawakami S, Asano T, et al. Safety of transperineal 14-core systematic prostate biopsy in diabetic men. Int J Urol 2009; 16: 930-935
15. Kubo Y, Kawakami S, Numao N, et al. Simple and effective local anesthesia for transperineal extended prostate biopsy: application to three-dimensional 26-core biopsy. Int J Urol 2009; 16: 420-423
16. Merrick GS, Taubenslag W, Andreini H, et al. The morbidity of transperineal template-guided prostate mapping biopsy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1524-1529 (Pubitemid 351704030)
17. Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy. Urology 2008; 71: 191-195 (Pubitemid 351282351)
18. Li H, Yan W, Zhou Y, Ji Z, Chen J,. Transperineal ultrasound-guided saturation biopsies using 11-region template of prostate: report of 303 cases. Urology 2007; 70: 1157-1161 (Pubitemid 350297370)
19. Yamamoto S, Kin U, Nakamura K, et al. Transperineal ultrasound-guided 12-core systematic biopsy of the prostate for patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 2.5-20 ng/ml in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2005; 10: 117-121 (Pubitemid 40655488)
20. Pinkstaff DM, Igel TC, Petrou SP, Broderick GA, Wehle MJ, Young PR,. Systematic transperineal ultrasound-guided template biopsy of the prostate: three-year experience. Urology 2005; 65: 735-739 (Pubitemid 40523009)
21. Miller J, Perumalla C, Heap G,. Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy. ANZ J Surg 2005; 75: 48-50 (Pubitemid 40394704)
22. Emiliozzi P, Corsetti A, Tassi B, Federico G, Martini M, Pansadoro V,. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. Urology 2003; 61: 961-966 (Pubitemid 36547739)
23. Thompson PM, Pryor JP, Williams JP, et al. The problem of infection after prostatic biopsy: the case for the transperineal approach. Br J Urol 1982; 54: 736-740 (Pubitemid 13179613)
24. Lee G, Attar K, Laniado M, Karim O,. Trans-rectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: nationwide diversity in practice and training in the United Kingdom. Int Urol Nephrol 2007; 39: 185-188 (Pubitemid 46722964)
25. Patel U, Dasgupta P, Amoroso P, Challacombe B, Pilcher J, Kirby R,. Infection after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: increased relative risks after recent international travel or antibiotic use. BJU Int 2012; 109: 1781-1785
26. Williamson DA, Barrett LK, Rogers BA, Freeman JT, Hadway P, Paterson DL,. Infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: new challenges in the era of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57: 267-274
27. Manecksha RP, Nason GJ, Cullen IM, et al. Prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy involving >1100 men. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; doi: 10.1100/2012/650858
28. Abughosh Z, Margolick J, Goldenberg SL, et al. A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine prophylactic cleansing of the rectum before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2013; 189: 1326-1331
29. Taylor S, Margolick J, Abughosh Z, et al. Ciprofloxacin resistance in the faecal carriage of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2013; 111: 946-953
30. Abdollah F, Novara G, Briganti A, et al. Trans-rectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? Urology 2011; 77: 921-925
31. Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, et al. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2012; 14: 310-315
32. Hossack T, Patel MI, Huo A, et al. Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy. J Urol 2012; 188: 781-785
33. Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, German L, Matzkin H,. High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 2012; 110: 993-997
34. Kinsella J, Hemelrijck MV, Popert R, Cahill D,. As part of an active surveillance protocol transperineal saturation prostate biopsies do not compromise radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Pract 2012; 66: 2
35. Kuru TH, Wadhwa K, Chang RT, et al. Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg Study Group for Enhanced Prostate Diagnostics. BJU Int 2013; 112: 568-577