Transperineal Ultrasound-Guided Saturation Biopsies Using 11-Region Template of Prostate: Report of 303 Cases

Urology

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1157-1161

  Li, Hanzhong ^a   Yan, Weigang ^a   Zhou, Yi ^a   Ji, Zhigang ^a   Chen, Jie ^a  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 37349049947     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.072     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Emiliozzi P., Corsetti A., Tassi B., et al. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. Urology 61 (2003) 961-966
2. Vis A.N., Boerma M.O., Ciatto S., et al. Detection of prostate cancer: a comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of sextant transrectal versus sextant transperineal biopsy. Urology 56 (2000) 617-621
3. Kaufman J.J., Rosenthal M., and Goodwin W.E. Methods of diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate: a comparison of clinical impression, prostatic smear, needle biopsy, open perineal biopsy and transurethral biopsy. J Urol 72 (1954) 450-465
4. Rifkin M.D., Kurtz A.B., and Goldberg B.B. Sonographically guided transperineal prostatic biopsy: preliminary experience with a longitudinal lineal-array transducer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 140 (1983) 745-747
5. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Terris M.K., et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142 (1989) 71-75
6. Shandera K.C., Thibault G.P., and Deshon Jr. J.E. Variability in patient preparation for prostate biopsy among American urologists. Urology 52 (1998) 644-646
7. Shinghal R., and Terris M.K. Limitations of transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. Urology 54 (1999) 706-708
8. Stewart C.S., Leibovich B.C., Weaver A.L., et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 166 (2001) 86-92
9. Furuno T., Demura T., Kaneta T., et al. Difference of cancer core distribution between first and repeat biopsy: in patients diagnosed by extensive transperineal ultrasound guided template prostate biopsy. Prostate 58 (2004) 76-81
10. Satoh T., Matsumoto K., Fujita T., et al. Cancer core distribution in patients diagnosed by extended transperineal prostate biopsy. Urology 66 (2005) 114-118
11. Igel T.C., Knight M.K., Young P.R., et al. Systematic transperineal ultrasound guided template biopsy of the prostate in patients at high risk. J Urol 165 (2001) 1575-1579
12. Naughton C.K., Miller D.C., Mager D.E., et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 164 (2000) 388-392
13. Malavaud B., Villers A., Ravery V., et al. Role of preoperative positive apical biopsies in the prediction of specimen-confined prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Eur Urol 37 (2000) 281-288
14. Connolly S.S., O'Toole G.C., O'Malley K.J., et al. Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact?. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38 (2004) 26-31
15. Emiliozzi P., Scarpone P., Depaula F., et al. The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/mL: a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy. J Urol 171 (2004) 197-199
16. Catalona W.J., Richie J.P., Ahmann F.R., et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early diction of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 151 (1994) 1283-1290
17. Ficarra V., Novella G., and Novara G. The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 932-937
18. Catalona W.J., Richie J.P., deKernion J.B., et al. Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 152 (1994) 2031-2036
19. Paul R., Scholer S., van Randenborgh H., et al. Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies: is there a relation to core number and sampling region?. Eur Urol 45 (2004) 450-456
20. Naughton C.K., Ornstein D.K., Smith D.S., et al. Pain and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial of 6 versus 12 cores. J Urol 163 (2000) 168-171
21. Rodriguez L.V., and Terris M.K. Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 160 (1998) 2115-2120