A linear-time bottom-up discourse parser with constraints and post-editing

52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages 511-521

  Feng, Vanessa Wei ^a   Hirst, Graeme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); SYNTACTICS;

BOTTOM UP APPROACH; DISCOURSE PARSERS; DISCOURSE PARSING; LOCAL CLASSIFIER; OVERALL ACCURACIES; STATE OF THE ART; TIME COMPLEXITY; VITERBI DECODING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84906932588     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p14-1048     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Jason Baldridge and Alex Lascarides. 2005. Probabilistic head-driven parsing for discourse structure. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 96-103, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Regina Barzilay and Mirella Lapata. 2008. Modeling local coherence: an entity-based approach. Computational Linguistics, 34(1):1-34.
3. Lynn Carlson, Daniel Marcu, and Mary Ellen Okurowski. 2001. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In Proceedings of Second SIGDial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDial 2001), pages 1-10.
4. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006).
5. Vanessa Wei Feng and Graeme Hirst. 2012. Text-level discourse parsing with rich linguistic features. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL 2012), pages 60-68, Jeju, Korea.
6. Hugo Hernault, Helmut Prendinger, David A. duVerle, and Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2010. HILDA: A discourse parser using support vector machine classification. Dialogue and Discourse, 1(3):1-33.
7. Shafiq Joty, Giuseppe Carenini, and Raymond T. Ng. 2012. A novel discriminative framework for sentence-level discourse analysis. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, EMNLPCoNLL 2012, pages 904-915.
8. Shafiq Joty, Giuseppe Carenini, Raymond Ng, and Yashar Mehdad. 2013. Combining intra- and multisentential rhetorical parsing for document-level discourse analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2013), pages 486-496, Sofia, Bulgaria, August.
9. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2003), ACL 2003, pages 423-430, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Alistair Knott and Robert Dale. 1994. Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 18(1):35-64.
11. John D. Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2001, pages 282-289, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
12. Gideon S. Mann and Andrew McCallum. 2008. Generalized Expectation Criteria for semi-supervised learning of Conditional Random Fields. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL 2008), pages 870-878, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. William Mann and Sandra Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3):243-281.
14. Daniel Marcu. 2000. The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. The MIT Press.
15. Andrew Kachites McCallum. 2002. MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
16. Philippe Muller, Stergos Afantenos, Pascal Denis, and Nicholas Asher. 2012. Constrained decoding for text-level discourse parsing. In Proceedings of COLING 2012, pages 1883-1900, Mumbai, India, December. The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.
17. Naoaki Okazaki. 2007. CRFsuite: a fast implementation of conditional random fields (CRFs). http://www.chokkan.org/software/crfsuite/.
18. Marta Recasens, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, and Christopher Potts. 2013. The life and death of discourse entities: Identifying singleton mentions. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 627-633, Atlanta, Georgia, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Rajen Subba and Barbara Di Eugenio. 2009. An effective discourse parser that uses rich linguistic information. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 566-574, Boulder, Colorado, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Charles Sutton, Andrew McCallum, and Khashayar Rohanimanesh. 2007. Dynamic conditional random fields: Factorized probabilistic models for labeling and segmenting sequence data. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8:693-723, May.
21. Christian Wojek and Bernt Schiele. 2008. A dynamic conditional random field model for joint labeling of object and scene classes. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV 2008), pages 733-747, Marseille, France.
22. Dong Yang, Paul Dixon, Yi-Cheng Pan, Tasuku Oonishi, Masanobu Nakamura, and Sadaoki Furui. 2009. Combining a two-step conditional random field model and a joint source channel model for machine transliteration. In Proceedings of the 2009 Named Entities Workshop: Shared Task on Transliteration (NEWS 2009), pages 72-75, Suntec, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.