An effective discourse parser that uses rich linguistic information

NAACL HLT 2009 - Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 566-574

  Subba, Rajen ^a   Di Eugenio, Barbara ^b  

^a YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

^b University of Illinois   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORMAL LOGIC; SEMANTICS;

COMPOSITIONAL SEMANTICS; DISCOURSE PARSING; DISCOURSE STRUCTURE; FIRST-ORDER LOGIC LEARNING; LEARNING PARADIGMS; LEXICAL INFORMATION; LINGUISTIC INFORMATION; RHETORICAL RELATIONS;

DECISION TREES;

EID: 84858434356     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1620754.1620837     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Asher, N., and Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. Baldridge, J. and Lascarides, A.: Probabilistic Head-Driven Parsing for Discourse Structure In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNNL), Ann Arbor, 2005.
3. Brill, E.: Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4):543565, 1995.
4. Buitelaar, P.: CoreLex: Systematic Polysemy and Un-derspecification. Ph.D. Thesis, Brandies University, 1998.
5. Carlson, L. D. M. and Okurowski., M. E.: Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In Current Directions in Discourse and Dialogue pages 85-112, 2003.
6. Cristea, D.: An Incremental Discourse Parser Architecture. In D. Christodoulakis (Ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference - Natural Language Processing - Patras, Greece, June 2000.
7. Forbes, K., Miltsakaki, E., R. P. A. S. A. J. and Webber., B.: D-ltag system - discourse parsing with a lexi-calized tree adjoining grammar. Information Stucture, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics, ESS-LLI 2001.
8. Grosz, B. J. and Sidner, C. L.: Attention, intention and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12:175-204, 1988.
9. Hobbs, J. R.: On the coherence and structure of discourse. In Polyani, Livia editor, The Structure of Discourse, 1985.
10. Kipper, K., H. T. D. and Palmer., M.: Class-based construction of a verb lexicon. AAAI-2000, Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2000.
11. Mann, W. and Thompson, S.: Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3):243-281, 1988.
12. Marcu, D.: Instructions for Manually Annotating the Discourse Structures of Texts. Technical Report, University of Southern California, 1999.
13. Marcu, D.: The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, MIT Press, 2000.
14. Moser, M. G., Moore, J. D., and Glendening, E.: Instructions for Coding Explanations: Identifying Segments, Relations and Minimal Units. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Computer Science, 1996.
15. Muggleton, S. H.: Inverse entailment and progol. In New Generation Computing Journal 13:245-286
16. Polanyi, L., Culy, C., van den Berg, M. H. and Thione, G. L.: A Rule Based Approach to Discourse Parsing. Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop in Discourse And Dialogue. Cambridge, MA USA pp. 108-117., May 1, 2004.
17. Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A., and Webber, B.: The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0. LREC, 2008.
18. Rosé, C. P.: A Syntactic Framework for Semantic Interpretation, Proceedings of the ESSLLI Workshop on Linguistic Theory and Grammar Implementation, 2000.
19. Sporleder, C. and Lascarides., A.: Exploiting linguistic cues to classify rhetorical relations. Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 2005.
20. Soricut, R. and Marcu., D.: Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology and North American Assiciation for Computational Linguistics Conference, 2003.
21. Subba, R., Di Eugenio, B., E. T.: Building lexical resources for princpar, a large coverage parser that generates principled semantic representations. LREC, 2006.
22. Subba, R.: Discourse Parsing: A Relational Learning Approach Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois Chicago, December 2008.
23. Webber, B.: DLTAG: Extending Lexicalized TAG to Discourse. Cognitive Science 28:751-779, 2004. (Pubitemid 40272588)
24. Wellner, B., Pustejovsky, J., C. H. R. S. and Rumshisky., A.: Classification of discourse coherence relations: An exploratory study using multiple knowledge sources. In Proceedings of the 7th SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, 2006.
25. Williams, S. and Reiter, E.: A corpus analysis of discourse relations for natural language generation. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics, pages 899-908, 2003.
26. Wolf, F. and Gibson, E.: Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based analysis. Computational Linguistics 31(2):249-287, 2005. (Pubitemid 43677417)