Probabilistic head-driven parsing for discourse structure

CoNLL 2005 - Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 96-103

  Baldridge, Jason ^a   Lascarides, Alex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCHEDULING;

APPOINTMENT SCHEDULING; BEST MODEL; DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; DISCOURSE STRUCTURE; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; F-SCORE; HEAD-DRIVEN; TURN-TAKING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053419930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1706543.1706560     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. N. Asher and A. Lascarides. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. J. Baldridge and A. Lascarides. Annotating discourse structures for robust semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 2005.
3. L. Carlson, D. Marcu, and M. Okurowski. Building a discoursetagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In Proceedings of the 2nd SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Eurospeech, 2001.
4. M. Collins. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 29(4):589.638, 2003.
5. J. R. Hobbs, M. Stickel, D. Appelt, and P. Martin. Interpretation as abduction. Arti_cial Intelligence, 63(1.2):69.142, 1993.
6. W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson. Rhetorical structure theory: Description and construction of text structures. In G. Kempen, editor, Natural Language Generation: New Results in Arti_cial Intelligence, pages 279.300. 1986.
7. D. Marcu. The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted natural language texts. In Proceedings of ACL/EACL, pages 96.103, Somerset, New Jersey, 1997.
8. D. Marcu. A decision-based approach to rhetorical parsing. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL99), pages 365.372, Maryland, 1999.
9. E. Miltsakaki, R. Prasad, A. Joshi, and B. Webber. The Penn Discourse TreeBank. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004.
10. J. D. Moore and M. E. Pollack. A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):537.544, 1992.
11. S. Oates. Generating multiple discourse markers in text. Master's thesis, ITRI, University of Brighton, 2001.
12. S. Oepen, E. Callahan, C. Manning, and K. Toutanova. LinGO Redwoods. a rich and dynamic treebank for HPSG. In Proceedings of the LREC parsing workshop: Beyond PARSEVAL, towards improved evaluation measures for parsing systems, pages 17.22, Las Palmas, 2002.
13. D. Schlangen and A. Lascarides. Resolving fragments using discourse information. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (Edilog), Edinburgh, 2002.
14. R. Soricut and D. Marcu. Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology and North American Association for Computational Linguistics, Edmonton, Canada, 2003.
15. A. Stolcke, K. Ries, N. Coccaro, E. Shriberg, D. Jurafsky R. Bates, P. Taylor, R. Martin, C. van Ess-Dykema, and M. Meteer. Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3):339.374, 2000.
16. M. Strübe and C. Müller. A machine learning approach to pronoun resolution in spoken dialogue. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL2003), pages 168.175, 2003.
17. J. van Eijk and H. Kamp. Representing discourse in context. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, editors, Handbook of Logic and Linguistics, pages 179.237. Elsevier, 1997.
18. R. Vieira and M. Poesio. Processing de_nite descriptions in corpora. In Corpus-based and computational approaches to anaphora. UCL Press, 2000.
19. J. M. Wiebe, T. P. O'Hara, T. Ohrstrom-Sandgren, and K. J. Mc-Keever. An empirical approach to temporal reference resolution. Journal of Arti_cial Intelligence Research, 9:247.293, 1998.