Written Dialog and Social Power: Manifestations of Different Types of Power in Dialog Behavior

6th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2013 - Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 216-224

  Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar ^a   Rambow, Owen ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POWER; POWER RELATIONS; TYPES OF POWER;

EID: 84906923440     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Agarwal, A. Omuya, A. Harnly, and O. Rambow. 2012. A Comprehensive Gold Standard for the Enron Organizational Hierarchy. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the ACL (Vol. 2: Short Papers), pages 161–165, Jeju Island, Korea, July. ACL.
2. O. Biran, S. Rosenthal, J. Andreas, K. McKeown, and O. Rambow. 2012. Detecting influencers in written online conversations. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language in Social Media, pages 37–45, Montréal, Canada, June. ACL.
3. D. B. Bracewell, M. Tomlinson, and H. Wang. 2012. A motif approach for identifying pursuits of power in social discourse. In ICSC, pages 1–8. IEEE Computer Society.
4. P. Bramsen, M. Escobar-Molano, A. Patel, and R. Alonso. 2011. Extracting social power relationships from natural language. In The 49th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 773–782. ACL.
5. C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, L. Lee, B. Pang, and J. Kleinberg. 2012. Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on WWW, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
6. J. R. French and B. Raven. 1959. The Bases of Social Power. In Dorwin Cartwright, editor, Studies in Social Power, pages 150–167. Univ. of Mich. Press.
7. E. Gilbert. 2012. Phrases that signal workplace hierarchy. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’12, pages 1037–1046, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
8. J. Hu, R. Passonneau, and O. Rambow. 2009. Contrasting the Interaction Structure of an Email and a Telephone Corpus: A Machine Learning Approach to Annotation of Dialogue Function Units. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference, London, UK, September. ACL.
9. N. Japkowicz. 2000. Learning from imbalanced data sets: Comparison of various strategies. In AAAI Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets.
10. T. Joachims. 1999. Making Large-Scale SVM Learning Practical. In B. Schölkopf, C. J.C. Burges, and A. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, Cambridge, MA, USA. MIT Press.
11. P. W. Jordan and B. Di Eugenio. 1997. Control and initiative in collaborative problem solving dialogues. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Comp. Models for Mixed Initiative, pages 81–84.
12. H. Lin, C. Lin, and R. C. Weng. 2007. A Note on Platt’s Probabilistic Outputs for Support Vector Machines. Mach. Learn., 68:267–276, October.
13. M. A. Locher. 2004. Power and politeness in action: disagreements in oral communication. Language, power, and social process. M. de Gruyter.
14. S. H. Ng, D. Bell, and M. Brooke. 1993. Gaining turns and achieving high in influence ranking in small conversational groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, pages 32, 265–275.
15. S. H. Ng, M Brooke,, and M. Dunne. 1995. Interruption and in influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, pages 14(4),369–381.
16. W. M. O’Barr. 1982. Linguistic evidence: language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. Studies on law and social control. Academic Press.
17. P. V. Ogren, P. G. Wetzler, and S. Bethard. 2008. ClearTK: A UIMA toolkit for statistical natural language processing. In Towards Enhanced Interoperability for Large HLT Systems: UIMA for NLP workshop at Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC).
18. V. Prabhakaran, O. Rambow, and M. Diab. 2012a. Annotations for power relations on email threads. In Proceedings of the Eighth conference on LREC, Istanbul, Turkey, May. ELRA.
19. V. Prabhakaran, O. Rambow, and M. Diab. 2012b. Predicting Overt Display of Power in Written Dialogs. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL, Montreal, Canada, June. ACL.
20. V. Prabhakaran, O. Rambow, and M. Diab. 2012c. Who’s (Really) the Boss? Perception of Situational Power in Written Interactions. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on COLING, Mumbai, India. ACL.
21. S. A. Reid and S. H. Ng. 2000. Conversation as a resource for in influence: evidence for prototypical arguments and social identification processes. European Journal of Social Psych., pages 30, 83–100.
22. R. Rowe, G. Creamer, S. Hershkop, and S.J. Stolfo. 2007. Automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Anal. ACM.
23. M. Walker and S. Whittaker. 1990. Mixed initiative in dialogue: An investigation into discourse segmentation. In Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting on ACL, pages 70–78. ACL.
24. T. E. Wartenberg. 1990. The forms of power: from domination to transformation. Temple Univ. Press.
25. A. Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on COLING - Volume 2, pages 947–953, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. ACL.