Who's (really) the boss? Perception of situational power in written interactions

24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2259-2274

  Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar ^a   Rambow, Owen ^b   Diab, Mona ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational sociolinguistics; Dialog; Dialog acts; Power analysis; Social networks

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL SOCIOLINGUISTICS; DIALOG; DIALOG ACTS; POWER ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84876809638     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Agarwal, A., Omuya, A., Harnly, A., and Rambow, O. (2012). A comprehensive gold standard for the enron organizational hierarchy. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 161-165, Jeju Island, Korea. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behaviour. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
3. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L. M. M. T., and Roseborough, M. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, pages 16(4), 461-468.
4. Bierstedt, R. (1950). An Analysis of Social Power. American Sociological Review.
5. Bramsen, P., Escobar-Molano, M., Patel, A., and Alonso, R. (2011). Extracting social power relationships from natural language. In ACL, pages 773-782. The Association for Computer Linguistics.
6. Brook, M. and Ng, S. H. (1986). Language and social influence in small conversational groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, pages 5(3), 201-210.
7. Creamer, G., Rowe, R., Hershkop, S., and Stolfo, S. J. (2009). Segmentation and automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis. In Zhang, H., Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Giles, C. L., Mccallum, A., Nasraoui, O., Srivastava, J., and Yen, J., editors, Advances in Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis, pages 40-58. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
8. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Syst. Res., 2(3):201-215.
9. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Lee, L., Pang, B., and Kleinberg, J. M. (2012). Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction. In Mille, A., Gandon, F. L., Misselis, J., Rabinovich, M., and Staab, S., editors, WWW, pages 699-708. ACM.
10. Diesner, J. and Carley, K. M. (2005). Exploration of communication networks from the enron email corpus. In In Proc. of Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism and Security, SIAM International Conference on Data Mining 2005, pages 21-23.
11. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1):31- 41.
12. French, J. R. and Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In Cartwright, D., editor, Studies in Social Power, pages 150-167+. University of Michigan Press.
13. Gilbert, E. (2012). Phrases that signal workplace hierarchy. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, pages 1037-1046, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
14. Hu, J., Passonneau, R., and Rambow, O. (2009). Contrasting the interaction structure of an email and a telephone corpus: A machine learning approach to annotation of dialogue function units. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference, London, UK. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Japkowicz, N. (2000). Learning from imbalanced data sets: Comparison of various strategies. In AAAI Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets.
16. Joachims, T. (1999). Making Large-Scale SVM Learning Practical. In Schölkopf, B., Burges, C. J., and Smola, A., editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, Cambridge, MA, USA. MIT Press.
17. Namata, Jr., G. M. S., Getoor, L., and Diehl, C. P. (2007). Inferring organizational titles in online communication. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Statistical network analysis, ICML'06, pages 179-181, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
18. Ng, S. H., Bell, D., and Brooke, M. (1993). Gaining turns and achieving high in influence ranking in small conversational groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, pages 32, 265-275.
19. Ng, S. H., Brooke, M., and Dunne, M. (1995). Interruption and in influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, pages 14(4), 369-381.
20. Noreen, E. W. (1989). Computer-Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses : An Introduction. Wiley-Interscience.
21. Ogren, P. V., Wetzler, P. G., and Bethard, S. (2008). ClearTK: A UIMA toolkit for statistical natural language processing. In Towards Enhanced Interoperability for Large HLT Systems: UIMA for NLP workshop at Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC).
22. Peterson, K., Hohensee, M., and Xia, F. (2011). Email formality in the workplace: A case study on the enron corpus. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Language in Social Media (LSM 2011), pages 86-95, Portland, Oregon. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Pitman, Marshfield, MA.
24. Prabhakaran, V., Rambow, O., and Diab, M. (2012a). Annotations for power relations on email threads. In Proceedings of the Eighth conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12), Istanbul, Turkey. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
25. Prabhakaran, V., Rambow, O., and Diab, M. (2012b). Predicting overt display of power in written dialogs. In Human Language Technologies: The 2012 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. Reid, S. A. and Ng, S. H. (2000). Conversation as a resource for in influence: evidence for prototypical arguments and social identification processes. European Journal of Social Psychology, pages 30, 83-100.
27. Scherer, K. R. (1979). Voice and speech correlates of perceived social influence in simulated juries. In H. Giles and R. St Clair (Eds), Language and social psychology, pages 88-120. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Shetty, J. and Adibi, J. (2005). Discovering important nodes through graph entropy the case of enron email database. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, LinkKDD '05, pages 74-81, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
29. Strzalkowski, T., Broadwell, G. A., Stromer-Galley, J., Shaikh, S., Taylor, S., and Webb, N. (2010). Modeling socio-cultural phenomena in discourse. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on COLING 2010, Beijing, China. Coling 2010 Organizing Committee.
30. Wartenberg, T. E. (1990). The forms of power: from domination to transformation. Temple University Press.
31. Yeh, A. (2000). More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2, COLING '00, pages 947-953, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
32. Yeh, J.-Y. and Harnly, A. (2006). Email thread reassembly using similarity matching. In CEAS 2006 - The Third Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, July 27-28, 2006, Mountain View, California, USA, Mountain View, California, USA.