Numerical limits in donor conception regimes: Genetic links and 'extended family' in the era of identity disclosure

Medical Law Review

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 325-356

  Millbank, Jenni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction; Donor conception; Donor family limits; Donor identity disclosure; Genetic links; Non traditional family forms

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; AUSTRALIA; CONFIDENTIALITY; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REGISTER; SIBLING; SPERMATOZOON; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

AUSTRALIA; CONFIDENTIALITY; DISCLOSURE; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HETEROLOGOUS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REGISTRIES; SIBLINGS; SPERMATOZOA; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 84906887064     PISSN: 09670742     EISSN: 14643790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwt044     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. E Blyth and L Firth, 'Donor-Conceived People's Access to Genetic and Biographical History' (2009) 23 IJLPF 174.
2. S Allan, A Cross-Jurisdictional Study of Regulatory Requirements and Practice Regarding the Recording of Donor Information and its Release to Donor Conceived People: A Report Prepared for the Winston Churchill Trust of Australia (Churchill Trust, Canberra 2012).
3. J Scheib and A Ruby, 'Beyond Consanguinity Risk: Developing Donor Birth Limits that Consider Psychosocial Risk Factors (2009) 91 Fertil Steril e12.
4. N Sawyer, 'Prospective Application of a Five-Step Regulatory Assessment Model to Proposed Federal Sperm Donor Registry in Australia: Is it in the Public Interest?' (2010) 17 J Law Med 608, 608.
5. N Sawyer, 'Sperm Donor Limits that Control for the "Relative" Risk Associated with the use of Open-Identity Donors' (2010) 25 Human Reprod 1089.
6. M Duell, 'Sperm Donor Revealed to Father 150 Children as Fears Grow for Spread of Disease and Incest' Daily Mail (London, 6 September 2011). Naomi Cahn argues for an identity register in the US in order to enforce family limits.
7. N Cahn, 'Necessary Subjects: The Need for a Mandatory National Donor Gamete Databank' (2009) 12 DePaul J Health Care L 203.
8. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), Fertility Treatment in 2011 Trends and Figures (HFEA, London 2013) 14.
9. A Macaldowie and others, Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2010, Assisted Reproduction Technology Series, cat no PER 55 (AIHW, Canberra 2012) vi, 47 and Supplementary Table S2.
10. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2004 (UK).
11. In Victoria, the central register had consent-based donor identity disclosure from 1988 to 1998.
12. L Johnson, K Bourne, and K Hammarberg, 'Donor Conception Legislation in Victoria, Australia: The "Time to Tell" Campaign, Donor-Linking and Implications for Clinical Practice' (2012) 19 J Law Med 803.
13. National Health and Medical Research Council, Ethical Guidelines on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research (Australian Government, Canberra 2004, rev 2007).
14. Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee, Donor Conception Practices in Australia: Report (Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra 2011) ('Senate Report'), Recommendation 29. The Committee also recommended the prohibition of imported gametes in order to ensure compliance: Recommendation 17.
15. HFEA, Donating Sperm and Eggs, Have Your Say (HFEA, London 2011) ('Have Your Say') accessed 16 October 2013.
16. HFEA, F-2011-00232-'HFEA Guidance on Sperm Donor Family Limit and Sperm Donation Outside HFEA Licensed Clinics', 24 August 2011 accessed 23 October 2013.
17. Australian Government, Government Response to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Report, Donor Conception Practices in Australia (August 2012). The Response indicates that many of the other recommendations concern state law or have already been implemented in state law or federal ethics guidance.
18. NSW Department of Health, Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 Statutory Review, Discussion Paper (NSW Government, Sydney 2013) 16-18 accessed 23 October 2013.
19. P Janssens, A Nap, and L Bansci, 'Reconsidering the Number of Offspring Per Gamete Donor in the Dutch Open-Identity System' (2011) 14 (2) Hum Fertil 106.
20. My Daddy's Name is Donor, a report by Elizabeth Marquardt for the 'Commission on Parenthood's Future', which concludes by urging parents not to conceive a child at all using donor gametes (Institute for American Values 2010) 79.
21. Marquardt gave oral evidence to the Australian Senate Inquiry, as did Family Voice Australia and the Australian Christian Lobby. While making specific claims for lower family limits, each organisation acknowledged that their overarching objective was to prevent donor conception in toto: Senate, Legal, and Constitutional Affairs References Committee, 'Donor Conception in Australia Inquiry', Transcripts, 29 October 2010.
22. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 'Donation Review Annexes', 13 July 2011, 192-4 ('HFEA Donation Annexes') accessed 18 October 2013.
23. For a thoughtful discussion of the inter-relation of adult and child interests and relationships in donor conception, and the role of clinicians and the State in considering the well-being of children yet to be born, see Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing (Nuffield Council, London 2013).
24. J Tobin, 'Donor-Conceived Individuals and Access to Information about Their Genetic Origins: The Relevance and Role of Rights' (2012) 19 J Law Med 742.
25. IG Cohen, 'Beyond Best Interests' (2012) 96 Minn L Rev 1187.
26. The 'Time to Tell' campaign by the Victorian Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA) accessed 16 October 2013.
27. R Thorpe and others, 'In the Best Interests of the Child? Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the Well-being of Offspring in Three Australian States' (2012) 26 IJLPF 259. Notably one study of parental disclosure found that disclosing and non-disclosing parents used welfare of the child reasoning to opposite effect.
28. D Shehab and others, 'How Parents Whose Children Have Been Conceived With Donor Gametes Make Their Disclosure Decision: Contexts, Influences and Couple Dynamics' (2008) 89 Fertil Steril 179, 183.
29. Parliament of Victoria Law Reform Committee, Inquiry into Access by Donor-Conceived People to Information About Donors-Final Report (Victorian Government, Melbourne 2012) ('Parliament of Victoria Report') [8.1].
30. TangledWebs, 'Submission 61 to Senate Inquiry' (2010).
31. International Donor Offspring Alliance, 'Submission 115 to Senate Inquiry' (2010).
32. Wand L Hewitt (founders of the Donor Conception Support Group), 'Submission 155 to Senate Inquiry' (2010). Submissions are online at accessed 22 October 2013.
33. V Jadva and others, 'The Experiences of Adolescents and Adults Conceived by Sperm Donation: Comparisons by Age of Disclosure and Family Type' (2009) 24 Hum Reprod 1909 (finding a correlation between late disclosure and negative feelings about donor conception).
34. AJ Turner and A Coyle, 'What Does it Mean to Be A Donor Offspring? The Identity Experiences of Adults Conceived by Donor Insemination and the Implications for Counselling and Therapy' (2000) 15 Hum Reprod 2041.
35. M Crawshaw and others, 'Working with Previously Anonymous Gamete Donors and Donor-Conceived Adults: Recent Practice Experiences of Running the DNA-Based Voluntary Information Exchange and Contact Register, UK DonorLink' (2013) Hum Fertil Online 1, 3.
36. K Dempsey, 'Submission 114 to Senate Inquiry' (2010).
37. N Grech, 'Submission 107 to Senate Inquiry' (2010).
38. For findings related to the broader study, see Special Issue: Law, Policy and Practice Concerning Stored Embryos in Assisted Reproduction (2013) 20 J Law Med 701-11, 759-830.
39. K Throsby and R Gill, 'It's Different for Men: Masculinities and IVF' (2004) 6 Men Masc 330.
40. A Greil, K Slauson-Blevins, and J McQuillan, 'The Experience of Infertility: a Review of Recent Literature' (2010) 32 Soc Health Ill 140.
41. K Daniels, W Gillett, and V Grace, 'Parental Information Sharing with Donor Insemination Conceived Offspring: a Follow-Up Study' (2009) 24 Hum Reprod 1099.
42. M Crawshaw, 'Prospective Parents' Intentions Regarding Disclosure Following the Removal of Donor Anonymity' (2008) 11 Hum Fertil 95.
43. J Readings and others, 'Secrecy, Disclosure and Everything In-Between: Decisions of Parents of Children Conceived by Donor Insemination, Egg Donation and Surrogacy' (2011) 22 Reprod BioMed Online 485.
44. M Kirkman, 'Parents' Contributions to the Narrative Identity of Offspring of Donor-Assisted Conception' (2003) 57 Soc Sci Med 2229.
45. K MacDougall and others, 'Strategies for Disclosure: How Parents Approach Telling Their Children that They Were Conceived with Donor Gametes' (2007) 87 Fertil Steril 524.
46. E Blyth, D Langridgen, and R Harris, 'Family Building in Donor Conception: Parents' Experiences of Sharing Information' (2010) 28 J Reprod Infant Psychol 116.
47. J Scheib and A Ruby, 'Contact Among Families Who Share the Same Sperm Donor' (2008) 90 Fertil Steril 33.
48. T Freeman and others, 'Gamete Donation: Parents' Experiences of Searching for their Child's Donor Siblings and Donor' (2009) 24 Hum Reprod 505.
49. P Mahlstedt, K LaBounty, and W Kennedy, 'The Views of Adult Offspring of Sperm Donation: Essential Feedback for the Development of Ethical Guidelines Within the Practice of Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States' (2010) 93 Fertil Steril 2236.
50. D Beeson, PK Jennings, and W Kramer, 'Offspring Searching for their Sperm Donors: How Family Type Shapes the Process' (2011) 26 Hum Reprod 2415.
51. V Jadva and others, 'Experiences of Offspring Searching for and Contacting Their Donor Siblings and Donor' (2010) 20 Reprod Biomed Online 523.
52. E Blyth and others, 'Donor Conceived People's Views and Experiences of their Genetic Origins: A Critical Analysis of the Research Evidence' (2012) 19 J Law Med 769.
53. E Blyth, 'Genes R Us? Making Sense of Genetic and Non-Genetic Relationships Following Anonymous Donor Insemination' (2012) 24(7) Reprod BioMed Online 719. The eight offspring were aged 44-65 at the time of the email interview.
54. P Nordqvist, '"I Don't Want Us to Stand Out More Than We Already Do": Lesbian Couples Negotiating Family Connections in Donor Conception' (2012) 15 Sexualities 644.
55. M Kirkman, 'Genetic Connection and Relationships in Narratives of Donor-Assisted Conception' (2004) 2 Aust J Emerging Technol Soc 1.
56. V Grace and K Daniels, 'The (Ir)Relevance of Genetics: Engendering Parallel Worlds of Procreation and Reproduction' (2007) 29 Soc Health Ill 692.
57. HFEA, 'UK and Overseas Donors' accessed 23 October 2013. This increased from 12 per cent in 2005.
58. D Snow, 'The Judicialisation of Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada: Decentralization, Medicalization and Mandatory Regulation' (2012) 27 Can J L & Soc'y 169.
59. VARTA, Annual Report 2013 (VARTA, Melbourne 2013), 14.
60. J Millbank and others, 'Embryo Donation for Reproductive Use in Australia' (2013) 20 J Law Med 789.
61. From 2007, the guidelines included a list of factors to be considered in setting a family limit without actually prescribing what that number should be: NHMRC, Ethical Guidelines, above, n 7, [6.3].
62. In 2002, the Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee, Code of Practice for Assisted Reproductive Technology Units (Fertility Society of Australia, 2002)
63. RTAC Code (2010), . In 2011.
64. RTAC, Advice to Units, Technical Bulletin (3 April 2011), 2, accessed 23 October 2013.
65. Human Reproductive Technology Act Directions 2004 (WA) 8.1.
66. Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW) s 27 (1).
67. M Crawshaw, 'Report on Trip to Australia and New Zealand' (University of York 2011) 22, accessed 23 October 2013.
68. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), '2006 Guidelines for Gamete and Embryo Donation' (2006) 86 Fertil Steril (supplement 4) S38-S43.
69. ASRM, 'Recommendations for Gamete and Embryo Donation: A Committee Opinion' (2013) 99 Fertil Steril 47, 53.
70. NSW Department of Health, 'Information for ART Providers' (2009), accessed 23 October 2013.
71. Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW) s 27(2), (3).
72. HFEA, T54 Licensing Condition; Assisted Reproductive Treatment Regulations 2009 (NSW) Reg 20.
73. HFEA, Who are the Donors, Donor Analysis Report (HFEA, SEED Review, London 2005) 6: from 21 to 41%, accessed 22 October 2013. In Australia, it appears that the largest group of sperm donors currently is men in their 40s
74. Reproductive Technology Council of WA (RTC), Annual Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 (2012) 30.
75. N Cahn, 'Accidental Incest: Drawing the Line-or the Curtain?-For Reproductive Technology' (2009) 32
76. Royal Commission echoed the original wording of UK legislation in recommending no more than 10 live births per sperm donor: Proceed With Care: Final Report of the Royal Commission into New Reproductive Technologies (Minister of Government Services: Ottawa, Canada 1993) 1027.
77. In 2008, the Attorney-General of Victoria stated that the '10 woman' provision would 'limit the pool of people who are closely related to each other' and 'protect the well-being of donor conceived persons': Victorian Parliamentary Library, Current Issues Brief No 5 of 2008, Assisted Reproductive Treatment Bill (Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne 2008) 6.
78. There was no discussion of the family limit in the law reform inquiry which preceded the legislation: Victorian Law Reform Commission, Assisted Reproductive Technology & Adoption, Final Report (VLRC, Melbourne 2007).
79. NSW Legislative Council, Debates, Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill 2007, 27 November 2007, 4384-5 (John Hatzistergos).
80. 'Questions and Answers About the Donation of Human Reproductive Material' (2012) 16, accessed 23 October 2013.
81. N Sawyer and J MacDonald, 'A Review of the Mathematical Models Used to Determine Sperm Donor Limits for Infertility Treatment' (2008) 90 Fertil Steril 265.
82. C Wang and others, 'Maximum Number of Live Births Per Donor in Artificial Insemination' (2007) 22 Hum Reprod 1363.
83. A chapter entitled 'Risk of Consanguinity and Limits on Donations', which introduces the issues as, 'the risks of consanguine relationships and, in particular, the impact on the ability of donor conceived people to have meaningful relationships with donors and half-siblings': Senate Report, above, n 8, [5.1].
84. British Fertility Society Working Party on Sperm Donation Services in the UK, 'Report and Recommendations' (2008) 11 (3) Hum Fertil 147
85. S Isaksson and others, 'Disclosure Behaviour and Intentions among 111 Couples Following Treatment with Oocytes or Sperm from Identity-Release Donors: Follow Up at Offspring Age 1-4 years' (2012) 27 Hum Reprod 2998.
86. J Scheib, M Riordan, and S Rubin, 'Adolescents with Open Identity Sperm Donors: Reports from 12-17 Year Olds' (2005) 20 Hum Reprod 239, 249.
87. HFEA created a National Donation Strategy Group with the aim of increasing donation: accessed 23 October 2013.
88. P Thomson, 'Shortage of Sperm Donors' Canberra Times (Canberra, 16 June 2013)
89. 'Critical Sperm Shortage in NSW' The Daily Telegraph (Sydney, 12 April 2010)
90. 'Australia Facing Sperm Donor Shortage' ABC News (Sydney, 17 July 2008). Waiting times of 18 months were recently reported for treatment in Western Australia.
91. C O'Leary, 'Donor Dads Sought Offshore' The West Australian (Perth, 15 July 2013).
92. Reports of chronic shortages and long waiting times on the webpage of a major Australian clinic: accessed 23 October 2013. A licence was recently granted for the importation of eggs into Victoria
93. J Medew, 'IVF Deal Sees American Eggs Heading Down Under' The Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney, 10 March 2013).
94. I Rodino, P Burton, and K Sanders, 'Mating by Proxy: A Novel Perceptive on Donor Conception' (2011) 96 Fertil Steril 998.
95. HFEA, SEED: A Report on the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority's Review of Sperm, Egg and Embryo Donation in the United Kingdom (HFEA, London 2005) 11. Note that prior to 2005, the UK legislation had specified 10 'live births' but contained an 'exception' for later siblings.
96. C Jones, 'Looking Like a Family: Negotiating Bio-Genetic Continuity in British Lesbian Families Using Licensed Donor Insemination' (2005) 8 Sexualities 221, discussing this finding among lesbian couples in the context of (then) donor anonymity in the UK.
97. Donor Conception Support Group, 'Submission No DCP10 to Victorian Inquiry' (August 2010).
98. Fertility Society of Australia, 'Submission No 106 to Senate Inquiry' (October 2010).
99. J Scheib and A Ruby, 'Contact Among Families Who Share the Same Sperm Donor' (2008) 90 Fertil Steril 33, 38.
100. VARTA, Consultation With Donors Who Donated Gametes in Victoria, Australia before 1998: Access by Donor- Conceived People to Information about Donors, Report to the Victorian Government (VARTA, Melbourne 2013) accessed 16 October 2013.
101. Naomi Cahn proposes 'donor-conceived family communities' as a term to cover these connections in 'The New Kinship' (2012) 100 Geo LR 367.
102. V Jadva and others, 'Sperm and Oocyte Donors' Experiences of Anonymous Donation and Subsequent Contact with their Donor Offspring' (2011) 26 Hum Reprod 638.
103. A Corderoy, 'Submission 77 to Victorian Inquiry' (October 2011).
104. J Millbank, 'Identity Disclosure and Information Sharing in Donor Conception Regimes: The Unfulfilled Potential of Voluntary Registers' forthcoming.
105. N Cahn, 'Legal Parent Versus Biological Parent: The Impact of Disclosure' (2012) 19 J Law Med 790, 795, and further discussion 796-798.
106. Neroli Sawyer arguing for lower family limits (in identity disclosure regimes only) to 'optimize the quality of the relationships in these new "families"': Sawyer, 'Sperm Donor Limits', above, n 2, 1093.
107. Sawyer, 'Prospective Application of a Five-Step Regulatory Assessment Model' above, n 2, 608 and 609.
108. R Hertz and J Mattes, 'Donor-Shared Siblings or Genetic Strangers: New Families, Clans and the Internet' (2010) 32 (9) J Family Issues 1129. In the proverbial sense, other offspring families appear to be more like friends than family: you can choose them.
109. Johnson, above, n 6. In the near future, consent-based access to identity disclosure is likely to be made available for offspring born before 1988
110. Victorian Government, Response to Inquiry into Access by Donor-Conceived People to Information about Donors (Victorian Government, Melbourne 2013) accessed 22 October 2013.
111. SK Templeton, 'Incest Rules Breached as Sperm Donor Fathers 17 Families' The Sunday Times (London,18 September 2011).
112. R Smith, 'British Man "Fathered 600 Children" at Own Fertility Clinic' The Telegraph (London, 8 April 2012).
113. J Madeira, 'Woman Scorned? Resurrecting Infertile Women's Decision-Making Autonomy' (2012) 71 Mar L Rev 339.