The (ir)relevance of genetics: Engendering parallel worlds of procreation and reproduction

Sociology of Health and Illness

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 692-710

  Grace, Victoria M ^a   Daniels, Ken R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Donor insemination; Family connectedness; Genetic inheritance; Information sharing; Procreation; Reproduction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CHILD PARENT RELATION; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCTION;

FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HETEROLOGOUS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; REPRODUCTION; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 34547888329     PISSN: 01419889     EISSN: 14679566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01010.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker, M. (2005) Medically assisted conception: revolutionizing family or perpetuating a nuclear and gendered model? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36, 4, 521 43.
2. Baron, A. Pannor, R. (1989) Lethal Secrets. New York : Warner Books.
3. Blyth, E. Landau, R. (2004) Third Party Assisted Conception Across Cultures. London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
4. Carsten, J. (2004) After Kinship. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5. Daniels, K.R. (2003) Policy development in third party reproduction: an international perspective. In Singer, D. Hunter, M. (eds) Assisted Human Reproduction. London : Whurr Publishers.
6. Daniels, K.R. (2004) Building a Family with the Assistance of Donor Insemination. Palmerston North NZ : Dunmore Press.
7. Daniels, K.R. Taylor, K. (1993) Secrecy and openness in donor insemination (International Roundtable Article), Politics and Life Sciences, 12, 2, 155 70.
8. Edwards, J. (2000) Born and Bred. Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9. Edwards, J. Strathern, M. (2000) Including our own. In Carsten, J. (Ed.) Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10. Finkler, K. (2001) The kin in the gene. The medicalisation of family and kinship in American society. Current Anthropology, 42, 2, 235 49.
11. Finkler, K., Skrzynia, C. Evans, J.P. (2003) The new genetics and its consequences for family, kinship, medicine and medical genetics, Social Science and Medicine, 57, 403 12.
12. Franklin, S. (1997) Embodied Progress. A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London : Routledge.
13. Franklin, S. (2001) Biologization revisited: kinship theory in the context of the new biologies. In Franklin, S. McKinnon, S. (eds) Relative Values. Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
14. Franklin, S. (2003) Re-thinking nature-culture. Anthropology and the new genetics, Anthropological Theory, 3, 1, 65 85.
15. Franklin, S., Lury, C. Stacey, J. (2000) Global Nature, Global Culture. London : Sage.
16. Grace, V. (2000) Baudrillard's Challenge. A Feminist Reading. London : Routledge.
17. Grace, V.M. (forthcoming) Human genome epidemiology: reviewing the stakes, International Journal of Health Services.
18. Haimes, E. (1998) Truth and the child: a sociological perspective. In Blyth, E. Crawshaw, M. Spiers, J. (eds) Truth and the Child Ten Years On: Information Exchange in Donor Insemination. Birmingham : The British Association of Social Workers.
19. Hargreaves, K. (2006) Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination, Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 3, 261 83.
20. Imber-Black, E. (1998) The Secret Life of Families. How Secrets Shape Relationships - When and How to Tell. London : Thorsons.
21. Latour, B. (1993) We have Never been Modern. Cambridge MA : Harvard University Press.
22. Levesque-Lopman, L. (2000) Listen, and you will hear: reflections on interviewing from a feminist phenomenological perspective. In Fisher, L. Embree, L. (eds) Feminist Phenomenology. The Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Nash, C. (2004) Genetic kinship, Cultural Studies, 18, 1, 1 33.
24. Oyama, S. (2000) The Ontogeny of Information - Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham NC : Duke University Press.
25. Pettle, S.A. (2003) Psychological therapy and counselling with individuals and families after donor conception. In Hunter, S.A. (Ed.) Assisted Human Reproduction: Psychological and Ethical Dilemmas. London : Whurr Publishers.
26. Rabinow, P. (1996) Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton NJ : Princeton University Press.
27. Sachs, L. (2004) The new age of the molecular family. An anthropological view on the medicalisation of kinship, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32, 24 9.
28. Schneider, D.M. (1968) American Kinship: a Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall.
29. Schneider, D.M. (1984) A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
30. Strathern, M. (1992a) After Nature. English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge : University of Cambridge Press.
31. Strathern, M. (1992b) Reproducing the Future. Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York : Routledge.
32. Strathern, M. (1995) Displacing knowledge: technology and the consequences for kinship. In Ginsburg, F.D. Rapp, R. (eds) Conceiving the New World Order. Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley : University of California Press.
33. Taylor, B. (2005) Whose baby is it? The impact of reproductive technologies on kinship, Human Fertility, 8, 3, 189 95.
34. Thompson, C. (2001) Strategic naturalizing: kinship in an infertility clinic. In Franklin, S. McKinnon, S. (eds) Relative Values. Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham NC : Duke University Press.
35. Wallbank, J. (2002) Too many mothers? Surrogacy, kinship and the welfare of the child, Medical Law Review, 10, 271 94.