The judicialization of assisted reproductive technology policy in Canada: Decentralization, medicalization, and mandatory regulation

Canadian Journal of Law and Society

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 169-188

  Snow, Dave ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction; Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; Constitutional law; Federalism; Judicial power; Morality policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864665054     PISSN: 08293201     EISSN: 19110227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cjls.27.2.169     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Elsa Acem, "Legal Expertise, Scientific Knowledge, and Medical Ethics at a Crossroads," Canadian Journal of Law and Society 22, 2 (2007): 231-41.
2. Francis Fukuyama, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2002).
3. Mary Lyndon Shanley, Making Babies, Making Families: What Matters Most in an Age of Reproductive Technologies, Surrogacy, Adoption and Same-Sex and Unwed Parents (Boston: Beacon Press, 2007).
4. Margaret Somerville, The Ethical Imagination: Journeys of the Human Spirit (Toronto: Anansi, 2006).
5. Christine Rothmayr Anderson, "Introduction: The Biotechnology Revolution and Comparative Policy Studies," Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11, 4 (2009): 413-24.
6. Sheila Jasanoff, Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).
7. Éric Montpetit, Christine Rothmayr, and Frédéric Varone, "Institutional Vulnerability to Social Constructions: Federalism, Target Populations, and Policy Designs for Assisted Reproductive Technology in Six Democracies," Comparative Political Studies 38 (2005): 119-42. (Pubitemid 40305946)
8. Adam D. Sheingate, "Promotion versus Precaution: The Evolution of Biotechnology Policy in the United States," British Journal of Political Science 36 (2006): 243-68. (Pubitemid 43383285)
9. Ran Hirschl, "The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide," Fordham Law Review 75 (2006): 721-53.
10. C. Neal Tate and Thorsten Vallinder, eds., The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York: New York University Press, 1995).
11. Mavis Jones and Brian Salter, "Learning to Regulate: Values, Actors, and Instruments in Developing Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Framework" (GBRG Working Paper 22, July 2007), 4.
12. Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, [2010] 3 SCR 457.
13. Pratten v British Columbia (AG), [2011] BCSC 656.
14. Theodore J. Lowi, "American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory," World Politics 16, 4 (1964), 688.
15. Christopher Z. Mooney, "The Public Clash of Private Values," in The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 2001), 3-4.
16. T. Alexander Smith and Raymond Tatalovich, Cultures at War. Moral Conflicts in Western Democracies (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2003).
17. Donley Studiar, "What Constitutes Morality Policy? A Cross-National Analysis," in The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 2001), 39.
18. Theodore J. Lowi, "Foreword: New Dimensions in Policy and Politics," in Moral Controversies in American Politics, 3rd ed., ed. Raymond Tatalovich and Bryon W. Daynes (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2005), xii.
19. Tom Ginsburg, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
20. Hirschl, Judicialization of Politics.
21. Alec Stone Sweet, The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
22. Tate and Vallinder, Judicial Power.
23. Charles R. Epp, The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 197-201.
24. F.L. Morton and Rainer Knopff, The Charter Revolution and the Court Party (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2000), 166.
25. Mary Ann Glendon, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: Free Press, 1991), 569.
26. Hirschl, Judicialization of Politics, 721.
27. Russell v The Queen, [1882] 7 AC 829.
28. Ontario (AG) v Canada (AG), [1896] AC 348 ["Local Prohibition Case"].
29. R v Morgentaler, [1988] 1 SCR 30.
30. Reference re Same-Sex Marriage, [2004] 3 SCR 698.
31. Proceed with Care: Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (Ottawa: Minister of Government Services Canada, 1993), 1049.
32. Assisted Human Reproduction Act, SC 2004, c 2.
33. Timothy Caulfield and Tania Bubela, "Why a Criminal Ban? Analyzing the Arguments against Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Canadian Parliamentary Debate," American Journal of Bioethics 7, 2 (2007): 51-61. (Pubitemid 46364825)
34. Alison Harvison Young, Let's Try Again ⋯ This Time with Feeling: Bill C-6 and New Reproductive Technologies," UBC Law Review 38, 1 (2005): 123-45.
35. Dana Hnatiuk, "Proceeding with Insufficient Care: A Comment on the Susceptibility of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act to Challenges under Section 7 of the Charter," University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 65, 1 (2007): 39-61.
36. Nancy Miller Chenier, "Intergovernmental Consultations on Health: Toward a National Framework on Reproductive Technologies" (Library of Parliament Working Paper PRB 02-34E, 2002), http://publications.gc.ca/ collections/Collection-R/LoPBdP/PRB-e/PRB0234-e.pdf, 16.
37. Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act at para 255.
38. "Patchwork Regulations Likely Outcome of Reproductive Technology Ruling" (Editorial) Canadian Medical Association Journal 183, 4 (2011), http://www.cmaj.ca/content/183/4/E215iulLpdf.
39. Carl A. Laskin, "The Supreme Court Judgment," Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (December 23,2010), http://www.cfas.ca/index. php?option=com-content&view=article&id=1061:supreme-court- judgment&catid=3:newsflash.
40. Sharon Kirkey and Janice Tibbetts, "Ruling Creates Regulation Gap," Edmonton Journal (December 23, 2010), A3.
41. Juliet Guichon, Michelle Giroux, and Ian Mitchell, "Once More, an Unregulated Nightmare," Globe and Mail (June 24, 2008), http://www.thqglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/article693776.ece (written in response to the initial Quebec Court of Appeal decision).
42. Diane Allen, executive director of the Infertility Network.
43. Tom Blackwell, "Observers Divided on Fertility Ruling," National Post (December 23, 2010), A1.
44. Law Needed for High-Tech Births" (Editorial), Victoria Times-Colonist (January 9, 2011), C2.
45. Matt McClure, "Alberta Fertility Industry to Remain Unregulated," Calgary Herald (December 23, 2010), A3.
46. Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act at para 255.
47. A Quebec (AG) v Canada (AG) at para 30.
48. Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act at paras 222-24.
49. Tom Blackwell, "Fertility Law Leaves Us in Limbo, Doctors Say," National Post (April 30, 2010), A1.
50. Eric Blyth and Marliyn Crawshaw, "Countdown Begins for Ending Donor Anonymity in British Columbia: Lessons for Us All?" BioNews (June 6, 2011), http://www.bionews.org.uk/page-96105.asp.
51. Report of the Standing Committee on Health, Assisted Human Reproduction: Building Families (Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2001).
52. Neal Hall, "B.C. Government to Appeal Landmark Decision to Identify Sperm Donors," Vancouver Sun (June 18, 2011), A12.
53. Processing and Distribution of Semen for Assisted Conception Regulation, SOR/96-254 ["Semen Regulations"]. See Pratten at para 123.
54. See Pratten at para 123
55. Pratten at para 152.
56. Vriend v Alberta, [1998] 1 SCR 493.
57. Gosselin v. Quebec (AG), [2002] 4 SCR 429.
58. Pratten at para 290.
59. Cheskes v Ontario (AG), [2007] 87
60. Pratten at para 313.
61. Gosselin at para 82-83.
62. Pratten at para 291.
63. Sunny Dhillon, "Landmark Ruling Ends Donor Anonymity in B.C.," Globe and Mail (May 20, 2011), A6.
64. Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act at para 251.
65. Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act at para 150.
66. Dobson (guardian ad litem of of) v Dobson, [1999] 2 SCR 753
67. Egan v Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513
68. Christine Rothmayr Allison and Audrey L'Espérance, "Morality Policies, Legal Mobilisation, and the Canadian Charter of Rignts ana Freedoms: Does Policy Determine Politics and Patterns of Judicialization?" (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2 -5 , 2010).
69. Pratten at para 210
70. Thomas M.J. Bateman, "Rights Application Doctrine and the Clash of Constitutionalisms in Canada," Canadian Journal of Political Science 31, 1 (1998), 6.
71. Pratten at para 211.
72. Guichon et al, "Unregulated Nightmare." This article was written in response to the Quebec Court of Appeal decision in 2008.
73. Françoise Baylis, "Supreme Court of Canada Decision on the Assisted Human Reproduction Act Creates Urgent Need for Action" (Guest Editorial), Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 33, 4 (2011), 318.
74. Alex Dobuzinskis, "'Octomom' Doctor Loses California Medical License," Reuters (June 1, 2011), http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/ 01/us-octomom-idUSTRE7507TL20110601.
75. Vanessa Gruben and Angela Cameron, "Assisted Reproduction in Canada: A Call to Action," Blogging for Equality (September 30, 2011), http://www.bloggingforequality.ca/2011/09/assisted-numan-reproduction-in-canada. html.
76. Baylis, "Urgent Need for Action," 318.
77. Pratten at para 177.
78. Baylis, "Urgent Need for Action," 319.
79. Tom Blackwell, "The Baby Market," National Post (March 10, 2012), A10.
80. Pratten at paras 177, 210.
81. Sahar Zomorodi, "Should s. 7 Rights Impose Positive State Obligations in the Context of Donor Anonymity?" Regulatory Offences and Compliances Newsletter 4, 9 (2011), 1, 4.
82. Keith Fraser, "B.C. Seeks to Overturn Anonymous Sperm Donor Ruling," Province [Vancouver] (February 14,2012), http://www.theprovince. com/news/seeks+overturn+anonymous+sperm+donor+ruling/6152407/story.html.
83. Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act at para 1.
84. Thomas Posyniak, "Assisted Human Reproduction and the Constitution: Introduction and Background to the Four-Part Commentary," Saskatchewan Law Review 74 (2011), 4.