Citations, contexts, and humanistic discourse: Toward automatic extraction and classification

Literary and Linguistic Computing

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 452-464

  Sula, Chris Alen ^a   Miller, Matthew ^b  

^a PRATT INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b The New York Public Library   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906883489     PISSN: 02681145     EISSN: 14774615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqu019     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ardanuy, J. (2013). Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(8): 1751-5.
2. Bavelas, J. B. (1978). The social psychology of citations. Canadian Psychological Review, 19(3): 158-63.
3. Börner, K. (2010). Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(4): 223-9.
5. Brughmans, T. (2013). Networks of networks: A citation network analysis of the adoption, use, and adaptation of formal network techniques in archaeology. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(4): 538-62.
6. Camacho-Miñano, M. and Núñez-Nickel, M. (2009). The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60(4): 754-77.
7. Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and locating. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(4): 284-90.
8. Case, D. O. and Higgins, G. M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7): 635-45.
9. Chubin, D. E. and Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4): 423-41.
10. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., and La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9): 855-71.
11. Cullars, J. (1990). Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs. The Library Quarterly, 60(4): 337-56.
12. Cullars, J. (1992). Citation characteristics of monographs in the fine arts. The Library Quarterly, 62(3): 325-42.
13. Frost, C. O. (1979). The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. The Library Quarterly, 49(4): 399-414.
14. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159): 108-111. doi: 10.1126/ science.122.3159.108.
15. Garfield, E. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? In Stevens, M. E. et al. (eds), Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation, Symposium Proceedings, Washington, 1964. Miscellaneous. Publication. 269. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., pp. 189-92.
16. Garfield, E., Irving, H. S., and Richard, J. T. (1964). The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
17. Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7: 113-22.
18. Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics, 86: 705-25.
19. Harwood, N. (2008). Citers' use of citees' names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6): 1007-11.
20. Heinzkill, R. (1980). Characteristics of references selected in scholarly English literary journals. Library Quarterly, 50: 352-64.
21. Hellqvist, B. (2010). Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2): 310-318.
22. Hérubel, J. -P. and Buchanan, A. L. (1994). Citation studies in the humanities and social sciences: A selective and annotated bibliography. Collection Management, 18(3/4): 89-136.
23. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3): 341-67.
24. Jurafsky, K. and Martin, J. (2008). Speech and Language Processing, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall.
25. Kaji, N. and Kitsuregawa, M. (2007). Building lexicon for sentiment analysis from massive collection of HTML documents. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. College Park, MD: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1075-83.
26. Knievel, J. and Kellsey, C. (2005). Citation analysis for collection development: A comparative study of eight humanities fields. The Library Quarterly, 75(2): 142-68.
27. Koppel, M., Argamon, S., and Shimoni, A. R. (2002). Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(4): 401-412.
28. Lamont, M. (2000). Meaning-making in cultural sociology: Broadening our agenda. Contemporary Sociology, 29(4): 602-7.
29. Larivière, V., Archambault,E ́., Gingras, Y., and Vignola- Gagné, É. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8): 997-1004.
30. Leydesdorff, L., Hammarfelt, B., and Salah, A. (2011). The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12): 2414-26.
31. Leydesdorff, L. and Wouters, P. (1999). Between texts and contexts: Advances in theories of citation? Scientometrics, 44(2): 169-82
32. Linmans, A. J. M. (2010). Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link: Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. Scientometrics, 83: 337-54.
33. Lisée, C., Larivière, V., and Archambault, E ́. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11): 1776-84.
34. Maričić, S., Spaventi, J., Pavičić, L., and Pifat-Mrzljak, G. (1998). Citation context versus frequency counts of citation histories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(6): 530-40.
35. Meadows, A. J. (1974). Communication in Science. London: Butterworths.
36. Mishne, G. and de Rijke, M. (2006). MoodViews: Tools for blog mood analysis. In Nicolov, N., Salvetti, F., Liberman, M.Y., and Martin, J.H. (eds), Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs: Papers from the 2006 Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA: AAAI.
37. Moravcsik, M. J. and Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1): 86-92.
38. Pang, B. and Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 1(1-2): 1-135.
39. Pao, M. L. (1981). Co-authorship as communication measure. Library Research, 2: 327-38.
40. Pao, M. L. (1982). Collaboration in computational musicology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33: 38-43.
41. Peritz, B. C. (1983). A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics, 5: 303-12.
42. Price, D. J. and Beaver, D. B. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21: 1011-18.
43. Qu, Y., Shanahan, J., and Wiebe, J. (eds), (2004). Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Papers from the 2004 Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA: AAAI.
44. Rokach, L., Kalech, M., Blank, I., and Stern, R. (2011). Who is going to win the next Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Fellowship Award? Evaluating researchers by mining bibliographic data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12): 2456-70.
45. Shelton, R. D. and Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Publish or patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3): 498-511.
46. Sievert, D. E. and Sievert, M. E. (1989). Philosophical research: Report from the field. Humanists at Work: Disciplinary Perspectives and Personal Reflections. Chicago: University Library, University of Illinois. Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., and Sen Gupta, S.
47. Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., and Sen Gupta, S.K. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3): 477-98.
48. Small, H. G. (1982). Cited documents as concept symbols, Social Studies of Science, 8(3): 327-40.
49. Smith, A. G. (2004). Web links as analogues of citations. Information Research, 9(4): 188. http://InformationR. net/ir/9-4/paper188.html.
50. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1): 83-106.
51. Smith, N. (2009). Citation in classical studies. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 3(1).
52. Sula, C. A. (2012). Visualizing social connections in the humanities: Beyond bibliometrics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(4): 31-5.
53. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Vargas-Quesada, B., de Moya-Anegon, F., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., and Gonzalez-Molina, A. (2010). Showing the essential science structure of a scientific domain and its evolution. Information Visualization, 9: 288-300.
55. Wiberly, S. E. and Jones, W. G. (1989). Patterns of information seeking in the humanities. College and Research Libraries, 50: 638-45.
56. White, M. D. and Wang, P. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2): 122-54.
57. Yan, E. and Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: how bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7): 1313-26.