High-Resolution visualisation of the states and pathways sampled in molecular dynamics simulations

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Blöchliger, Nicolas ^a   Vitalis, Andreas ^a   Caflisch, Amedeo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906877949     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep06264     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fu, T.-C. A review on time series data mining. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 24, 164-181 (2011).
2. Kehrer, J. &Hauser, H. Visualization and visual analysis of multifaceted scientific data: A survey. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19, 495-513 (2013).
3. Rysavy, S. J., Bromley, D. &Daggett, V. DIVE: A graph-based visual-analytics framework for big data. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 34, 26-37 (2014).
4. Bohlouli, M. et al. in Integration of Practice-Oriented Knowledge Technology: Trends and Prospectives (ed Fathi, M.) Ch. Towards an integrated platform for big data analysis, 47-56 (Springer, 2013).
5. Dror, R. O., Dirks, R. M., Grossman, J. P., Xu, H. &Shaw, D. E. Biomolecular simulation: A computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 41, 429-452 (2012).
6. Spiliotopoulos, D. &Caflisch, A. Molecular dynamics simulations of bromodomains reveal binding-site flexibility and multiple binding modes of the natural ligand acetyl-lysine. Isr. J. Chem. in press, DOI: 10.1002/ijch. 201400009 (2014).
7. Karplus, M. &McCammon, J. A. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 646-652 (2002).
8. Onuchic, J. N., Luthey-Schulten, Z. &Wolynes, P. G. Theory of protein folding: The energy landscape perspective. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 545-600 (1997).
9. Blohliger, N.,Vitalis, A.&Caflisch, A.Ascalable algorithm to order and annotate continuous observations reveals the metastable states visited by dynamical systems. Comp. Phys. Comm. 184, 2446-2453 (2013).
10. Xu, R. &Wunsch II, D. C. Clustering algorithms in biomedical research: A review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3, 120-154 (2010).
11. Shaw, D. E. et al. Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330, 341-346 (2010).
12. Liu, F. et al. An experimental survey of the transition between two-state and downhill protein folding scenarios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2369-2374 (2008).
13. Berndt, K. D., Gutert, P., Orbons, L. P. M. &Wuhrich, K. Determination of a high-quality nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and comparison with three crystal structures. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 757-775 (1992).
14. Krivov, S. V. &Karplus, M. One-dimensional free-energy profiles of complex systems: Progress variables that preserve the barriers. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 12689-12698 (2006).
15. Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O. &Shaw, D. E.How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334, 517-520 (2011).
16. Kellogg, E. H., Lange, O. F. &Baker, D. Evaluation and optimization of discrete state models of protein folding. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 11405-11413 (2012).
17. Kabsch, W. &Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577-2637 (1983).
18. Krivov, S. V. The free energy landscape analysis of protein (FIP35) folding dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 12315-12324 (2011).
19. Lane, T. J., Bowman, G. R., Beauchamp, K., Voelz, V. A. &Pande, V. S. Markov state model reveals folding and functional dynamics in ultra-longMDtrajectories. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18413-18419 (2011).
20. Berezovska, G., Prada-Garcia, D. &Rao, F. Consensus for the Fip35 folding mechanism? J. Chem. Phys. 139, 035102 (2013).
21. Wintjens, R. et al. 1H NMR study on the binding of Pin1 Trp-Trp domain with phosphothreonine peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 25150-25156 (2001).
22. Beccara, S.,Skrbič T., Covino, R. &Faccioli, P. Dominant folding pathways of a WW domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2330-2335 (2012).
23. McGibbon, R. T.&Pande, V. S. Learning kinetic distance metrics for Markov state models of protein conformational dynamics. J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 9, 2900-2906 (2013).
24. Liu, F., Nakaema, M. &Gruebele, M. The transition state transit time of WW domain folding is controlled by energy landscape roughness. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 195101 (2009).
25. Otting, G., Liepinsh, E. &Wührich, K. Disulfide bond isomerization in BPTI and BPTI(G36S): An NMR study of correlated mobility in proteins. Biochemistry 32, 3571-3582 (1993).
26. Grey, M. J., Wang, C. &Palmer III, A. G. Disulfide bond isomerization in basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor: Multisite chemical exchange quantified by CPMG relaxation dispersion and chemical shift modeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 14324-14335 (2003).
27. Long, D. &Brüchweiler, R. Atomistic kinetic model for population shift and allostery in biomolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18999-19005 (2011).
28. Xue, Y., Ward, J. M., Yuwen, T., Podkorytov, I. S. &Skrynnikov, N. R. Microsecond time-scale conformational exchange in proteins: Using long molecular dynamics trajectory to simulateNMRrelaxation dispersion data. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 2555-2562 (2012).
29. Noé F., Wu, H., Prinz, J.-H. &Plattner, N. Projected and hidden Markov models for calculating kinetics and metastable states of complex molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 184114 (2013).
30. Vitalis, A. &Caflisch, A. Efficient construction of mesostate networks from molecular dynamics trajectories. J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 8, 1108-1120 (2012).
31. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. &Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38 (1996).