The role of statistics in the discovery of a higgs boson

Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages 41-59

  Van Dyk, David A ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Detection; Exclusion; Hypothesis testing; Look elsewhere effect; Particle physics; Poisson models; Sensitivity; Upper limits

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906877767     PISSN: 23268298     EISSN: 2326831X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-062713-085841     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson PW. 1992. The Reverend Thomas Bayes, needles in haystacks, and the fifth force. Phys. Today 45:9-11.
2. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 2012. The Higgs boson. Science 338:1558-59.
3. ATLAS Collab. 2008. Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment: Detector, Trigger and Physics. CERNOPEN- 2008-020. Geneva, Switz.: CERN.
4. ATLAS Collab. 2012a. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716:1-29.
5. ATLAS Collab. 2012b. Observation of an Excess of Events in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson in the γγ Channel with the ATLAS Detector. ATLAS-CONF-2012-091. Geneva, Switz.: CERN
6. ATLAS Collab. 2012c. A particle consistent with the Higgs boson observed with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Science 338:1576-82.
7. Berger J. 2008. A comparison of testing methodologies. See Lyons et al. 2008, pp. 8-19.
8. Berger JO, Delampady M. 1987. Testing precise hypotheses (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 2:317-52.
9. Campagnari C, Franklin M. 1997. The discovery of the top quark. Rev. Mod. Phys. 69:137-211.
10. Chernoff H. 1954. On the distribution of the likelihood ratio. Ann. Math. Stat. 25:573-78.
11. CLAS Collab. 2003. Observation of an exotic S = +1 baryon in exclusive photoproduction from the deuteron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:252001.
12. CLAS Collab. 2006. Search for the θ + pentaquark in the reaction γ d → pκ-κ+n. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:212001.
13. CLAS Collab. 2008. Bayesian analysis of pentaquark signals from CLAS data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:052001.
14. CMS Collab. 2007. CMS physics technical design report. Volume II: Physics performance. J. Phys. G 34:995-1579.
15. CMS Collab. 2012a. A new boson with a mass of 125 GeV observed with the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. Science 338:1569-75.
16. CMS Collab. 2012b. Observation of a new boson at amass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716:30-61.
17. Cousins RD. 1995. Why isn't every physicist a Bayesian? Am. J. Phys. 63:398-410.
18. Cousins RD. 2008. Comment on "Bayesian analysis of pentaquark signals from CLAS data." Phys. Rev. Lett. 101:029101.
19. Cousins RD, Highland VL. 1992. Incorporating systematic uncertainties into an upper limit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 320:331-35.
20. Cowan G, Cranmer K, Gross E, Vitells O. 2011a. Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests for new physics. Eur. Phys. J. C 71:1554.
21. CowanG,Cranmer K, GrossE, Vitells O. 2011b. Power-constrained limits. arXiv:1105.3166 [physics.data-an].
22. Cox DR. 2011. Discovery: a statistical perspective. See Prosper & Lyons 2011, pp. 12-16.
23. Davies RB. 1987. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74:33-43.
24. Del Rosso A. 2012. Higgs: the beginning of the exploration. CERN Wkly. Bull. 47-48/2012.
25. Della Negra M, Jenni P, Virdee TS. 2012. Journey in the search for the Higgs boson: the ATLAS and CMS experiments at the Large Hadron Collider. Science 338:1560-68.
26. Demortier L. 2008. P values and nuisance parameters. See Lyons et al. 2008, pp. 23-33.
27. Ellis J, Gaillard MK, Nanopoulos DV. 2012. A historical profile of the Higgs boson. arXiv:1201.6045v1 [hep-ph].
28. Feldman GJ, Cousins RD. 1998. Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals. Phys. Rev. D 57:3873-89.
29. Friedman JH. 2005. Separating signal from background using ensembles of rules. See Lyons & Unel 2005, p. 10.
30. Gross E, Vitells O. 2010. Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics. Eur. Phys. J. C 70:525-30.
31. Heinrich J, Blocker C, Conway J, Demortier L, Lyons L, et al. 2004. Interval Estimation in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters. 1. Bayesian Approach. CDF note 7117. Batavia, IL: Fermilab. 30 pp.
32. Higgs PW. 1964. Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13:508-9.
33. Junk T. 1999. Confidence level computation for combining searcheswith small statistics. Nucl. Instrum.Methods A 434:435-43.
34. Kashyap VL, vanDyk DA, Connors A, Freeman PE, Siemiginowska A, et al. 2010. On computing upper limits to source intensities. Astrophys. J. 719:900-14.
35. Lederman LM. 1993. The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question? Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36. Lyons L. 2008. Open statistical issues in particle physics. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2:887-915.
37. Lyons L. 2012. Discovery or fluke: statistics in particle physics. Phys. Today 65:45-51.
38. Lyons L. 2013. Bayes and frequentism: a particle physicist's perspective. Contemp. Phys. 54:1-16.
39. Lyons L, Mount R, Reitmeyer R, eds. 2004. Proceedings of the Conference on Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology (PHYSTAT 2003), Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California September 8-11, 2003. Menlo Park, CA: SLAC Tech. Publ.
40. Lyons L, Prosper HB, de Roeck A, eds. 2008. Proceedings of the PHYSTAT 2007 Workshop on Statistical Issues for LHC Physics, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 27-29 June 2007. CERN-2008-001. Geneva, Switz.: CERN.
41. Lyons L, Unel MK, eds. 2005. Proceedings of the PHYSTAT 2005 Workshop on Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology, Oxford, UK, 12-15 September 2005. London: Imperial Coll. Press.
42. Mandelkern M. 2002. Setting confidence intervals for bounded parameters (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 17:149-72.
43. Park T, van Dyk DA, Siemiginowska A. 2008. Searching for narrow emission lines in X-ray spectra: computation and methods. Astrophys. J. 688:807-25.
44. Part. Data Group. 2006. Review of particle physics. J. Phys. G 33:1-1232.
45. Part. Data Group. 2008. Review of particle physics. Phys. Lett. B 667:1-1340.
46. Prosper HB, Lyons L, eds. 2011. Proceedings of the PHYSTAT 2011 Workshop on Statistical Issues Related to Discovery Claims in Search Experiments and Unfolding, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 17-20 January 2011. CERN-2011-006. Geneva, Switz.: CERN.
47. Protassov R, van Dyk DA, Connors A, Kashyap V, Siemiginowska A. 2002. Statistics: Handle with care- detecting multiple model components with the likelihood ratio test. Astrophys. J. 571:545-59.
48. Punzi G. 2004. Sensitivity of searches for new signals and its optimization. See Lyons et al. 2004, pp. 79-83.
49. Read AL. 2000. Modified frequentist analysis of search results (the CLs method). http://cds.cern.ch/record/451614.
50. Read AL. 2002. Presentation of search results: the CLS technique. J. Phys. G 10:2693-704.
51. Roe BP, Woodroofe MB. 1999. Improved probability method for estimating signal in the presence of background. Phys. Rev. D 60:053009.
52. Roe BP, Yang H-J, Zhu J, Liu Y, Stancu I, McGregor G. 2005. Boosted decision trees as an alternative to artificial neural networks for particle identification. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 543:577-84.
53. RolkeWA, Lopez AM, Conrad J. 2005. Limits and confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 551:493-503.
54. Salam A. 1968. Weak and electromagnetic interactions. In Proceedings of the Eighth Nobel Symposium, Lerum, Sweden, 19-25 May 1968, ed. N Svartholm, pp. 367-77. Stockholm: Almqvist &Wiksell.
55. van Dyk DA. 2011. Setting limits, computing intervals, and detection. See Prosper & Lyons 2011, pp. 149-57.
56. Vitells O. 2011. Estimating the "look elsewhere effect" when searching for a signal. See Prosper & Lyons 2011, pp. 183-89.
57. Weinberg S. 1967. A model of leptons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19:1264-66.
58. Weniger C. 2012. A tentative γ -ray line from dark matter annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1208:007.