Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 3873-3889

  Cousins, Robert D ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001340366     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.3873     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. J. Neyman, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A236, 333 (1937). Reprinted in A Selection of Early Statistical Papers on J. Neyman (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967), pp. 250–289. See in particular pp. 250–252, 261–268, 285–286, of the reprint. Unfortunately, the quantity which Neyman calls α is precisely what is called (Formula presented) in modern references. We use the adjectives “classical” and “frequentist” synonymously to refer to the theory of these confidence intervals.
2. Particle Data Group, R. M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1 (1996). Confidence interval discussion is on pp. 162–166. Neutrino oscillation parameter plot discussion is on pp. 287–288.
3. O. Helene, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 212, 319 (1983);
4. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.O. Helene, 228, 120 (1984);
5. with criticism by F. James, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 240, 203 (1985);
6. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. AO. Helene, 300, 132 (1991).
7. H. B. Prosper, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 241, 236 (1985);
8. H. B. Prosper, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1153 (1988);
9. Phys. Rev. Dand comment by D. A. Williams, 38, 3582 (1988);
10. Phys. Rev. Dand reply by H. B. Prosper, 38, 3584 (1988).
11. For example, S. Zacks, The Theory of Statistical Inference (Wiley, New York, 1971), p. 529.
12. For a related discussion, see Philip W. Anderson, Phys. Today 45 (1), 9 (1992).
13. Harold Jeffreys, Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1983). See in particular pp. 135–138.
14. E. T. Jaynes, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybernet. SSC-4, 227 (1968).
15. A. Stuart and J. K. Ord, Classical Inference and Relationship, 5th ed., Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1991);see also earlier editions by Kendall and Stuart.
16. H. Jeffreys, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series A 186, 453 (1946);G. E. P. Box and G. C. Tiao, Bayesian Inference and Statistical Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973) (see in particular pp. 25–46);
17. R. E. Kass, Biometrika 77, 107 (1990);
18. J. G. Ibrahim and P. W. Laud, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86, 9816 (1991) and references therein.
19. W. T. Eadie, D. Drijard, F. E. James, M. Roos, and B. Sadoulet, Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971).
20. F. Garwood, Biometrika 28, 437 (1936).
21. W. E. Ricker, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 32, 349 (1937).
22. E. L. Crow and R. S. Gardner, Biometrika 46, 441 (1959).
23. B. Kayser, Phys. Rev. D 24, 110 (1981) and references therein.
24. S. Baker and R. Cousins, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 221, 437 (1984).
25. F. James and M. Roos, Phys. Rev. D 44, 299 (1991).