Tracked ultrasonography snapshots enhance needle guidance for percutaneous renal access: A pilot study

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1040-1045

  Ungi, Tamas ^a   Beiko, Darren ^a   Fuoco, Michael ^a   King, Franklin ^a   Holden, Matthew S ^a   Fichtinger, Gabor ^a   Siemens, D Robert ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; NEEDLE; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES;

HUMANS; NEEDLES; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PILOT PROJECTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84906852017     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Regalado SP. Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy. Semin Intervent Radiol 2006;23:287-94.
2. Hausegger KA, Portugaller HR. Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: Technique-indications-complications. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2016-2030.
3. Funaki B, Vatakencherry G. Comparison of single-stick and double-stick techniques for percutaneous nephrostomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004;27:35-37.
4. Sancaktutar AA, Bozkurt Y, Tüfek A, et al. Radiation-free percutaneous nephrostomy performed on neonates, infants, and preschool-age children. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:464-471.
5. Uppot RN. Emergent nephrostomy tube placement for acute urinary obstruction. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 12:154-161.
6. Basiri A, Mirjalili MA, Kardoust Parizi M, Moosa Nejad NA. Supplementary X-ray for ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position versus standard technique: A randomized controlled trial. Urol Int 2013;90: 399-404.
7. Wood BJ, Zhang H, Durrani A, et al. Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: A feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:493-505.
8. Abi-Jaoudeh N, Glossop N, Dake M, et al. Electromagnetic navigation for thoracic aortic stent-graft deployment: A pilot study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:888-895.
9. Venkatesan AM, Kadoury S, Abi-Jaoudeh N, et al. Realtime FDG PET guidance during biopsies and radiofrequency ablation using multimodality fusion with electromagnetic navigation. Radiology 2011;260:848-856.
10. Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2011;186:1281-1285.
11. Bruners P, Penzkofer T, Nagel M, et al. Electromagnetic tracking for CT-guided spine interventions: Phantom, ex-vivo and in-vivo results. Eur Radiol 2009;19:990-994.
12. Krombach GA, Mahnken A, Tacke J, et al. US-guided nephrostomy with the aid of a magnetic field-based navigation device in the porcine pelvicaliceal system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:623-628.
13. Ungi T, Abolmaesumi P, Jalal R, et al. Spinal needle navigation by tracked ultrasound snapshots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59:2766-2772.
14. Lasso A, Heffter T, Pinter C, et al. Implementation of the PLUS open-source toolkit for translational research of ultrasound-guidedintervention systems. The MIDAS Journal-Medical Imaging and Computing. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10380/3363. Accessed: April 29, 2014.
15. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323-1341.
16. Tokuda J, Fischer GS, Papademetris X, et al. Open IGT Link: An open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int J Med Robot 2009;5:423-434.
17. Ungi T, Sargent D, Moult E, et al. Perk Tutor: an open-source training platform for ultrasound-guided needle insertions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59:3475-3481.
18. Hana°s E, Larsson E, Fellström B, et al. Safety aspects and diagnostic findings of serial renal allograft biopsies, obtained by an automatic technique with a midsize needle. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1992;26:413-420.
19. Lazarus J, Williams J. The Locator: Novel percutaneous ne-phrolithotomy apparatus to aid collecting system puncture-a preliminary report. J Endourol 2011;25:747-750.
20. Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Häcker A, Michel MS. Laser-guided percutaneous kidney access with the Uro Dyna-CT: First experience of three-dimensional puncture planning with an ex vivo model. World J Urol 2013;31:1147-1151.
21. Huber J, Wegner I, Meinzer HP, et al. Multimedia article. Navigated renal access using electromagnetic tracking: An initial experience. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1307-1312.
22. Rodrigues PL, Vilaça JL, Oliveira C, et al. Collecting system percutaneous access using real-time tracking sensors: First pig model in vivo experience. J Urol 2013;190:1932-1937.
23. Müller M, Rassweiler MC, Klein J, et al. Mobile augmented reality for computer-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2013;8:663-675.
24. Lewis S, Patel U. Major complications after percutaneous nephrostomy-lessons from a department audit. Clin Radiol 2004;59:171-179.
25. Zagoria RJ, Dyer RB. Do's and don't's of percutaneous nephrostomy. Acad Radiol 1999;6:370-377.
26. Eswara JR, Lee H, Dretler SP, Sacco D. The effect of delayed percutaneous nephrolithotomy on the risk of bac-teremia and sepsis in patients with neuromuscular disorders. World J Urol 2013;31:1611-1615.
27. Skoog SJ, Reed MD, Gaudier FA Jr, Dunn NP. The pos-terolateral and the retrorenal colon: Implication in percutaneous stone extraction. J Urol. 1985;134:110-112.