Real-time FDG PET guidance during biopsies and radiofrequency ablation using multimodality fusion with electromagnetic navigation

Radiology

Volumn 260, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 848-856

  Venkatesan, Aradhana M ^a   Kadoury, Samuel ^b   Abi Jaoudeh, Nadine ^a   Levy, Elliot B ^a   Maass Moreno, Roberto ^a   Krücker, Jochen ^b   Dalal, Sandeep ^b   Xu, Sheng ^b   Glossop, Neil ^c   Wood, Bradford J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c Focused Ultrasound Surgery Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; IOPAMIDOL;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; FEMALE; GENERATOR; HUMAN; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CATHETER ABLATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84860390364     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101985     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Czernin J., Benz M.R., Allen-Auerbach M.S. PET/CT imaging: The incremental value of assessing the glucose metabolic phenotype and the structure of cancers in a single examination. Eur J Radiol 2010;73(3):470-480.
2. Poeppel T.D., Krause B.J., Heusner T.A., Boy C., Bockisch A., Antoch G. PET/CT for the staging and follow-up of patients with malignancies . Eur J Radiol 2009;70(3):382-392.
3. Ahmadzadehfar H., Rodrigues M., Zakavi R., Knoll P., Mirzaei S Prognostic significance of the standardized uptake value of pretherapeutic 18F-FDG PET in patients with malignant lymphoma Med Oncol doi:10.1007/s12032-010-9584-2. Published June 4, 2010. Accessed May 25, 2011.
4. Arulampalam T.H., Costa D.C., Loizidou M., Visvikis D., Ell P.J., Taylor I. Positron emission tomography and colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88(2):176-189. (Pubitemid 32142702)
5. Berghmans T., Dusart M., Paesmans M., et al. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography(FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review and meta-analysis(MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3(1):6-12.
6. Choi J.Y., Jang H.J., Shim Y.M., et al. 18F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: Prognostic implications. J Nucl Med 2004; 45(11):1843-1850.
7. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A., Strauss L.G., Egerer G., et al. Impact of dynamic 18FFDG PET on the early prediction of therapy outcome in patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A feasibility study. J Nucl Med 2010;51(4):551-558.
8. Israel O., Kuten A. Early detection of cancer recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT can make a difference in diagnosis and patient care. J Nucl Med 2007;48(Suppl 1):28S-35S. (Pubitemid 47604940)
9. Kidd E.A., Siegel B.A., Dehdashti F., Grigsby P.W. Pelvic lymph node F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a prognostic biomarker in newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer 2010;116(6):1469-1475.
10. Gorospe L., Raman S., Echeveste J., Avril N., Herrero Y., Herna Ndez S. Whole-body PET/CT: Spectrum of physiological variants, artifacts and interpretative pitfalls in cancer patients. Nucl Med Commun 2005;26(8):671-687. (Pubitemid 41073368)
11. Metser U., Even-Sapir E. Increased(18)Ffl uorodeoxyglucose uptake in benign, nonphysiologic lesions found on whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT): Accumulated data from four years of experience with PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med 2007;37(3):206-222. (Pubitemid 46517465)
12. Wood B.J., Locklin J., Viswanathan A., et al. Technologies for guidance of radiofrequency ablation in the multimodality interventional suite of the future. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18(1 pt 1):9-24. (Pubitemid 46628942)
13. Wood B.J., Zhang H., Durrani A., et al. Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: A feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16(4):493-505. (Pubitemid 40464192)
14. Wood B.J., Kruecker J., Abi-Jaoudeh N., et al. Navigation systems for ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21(suppl 8):S257-S263.
15. Krücker J., Xu S., Glossop N., et al. Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: Clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18(9):1141-1150. (Pubitemid 47332231)
16. Tatli S., Gerbaudo V.H., Mamede M., Tuncali K., Shyn P.B., Silverman S.G. Abdominal masses sampled at PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy: Initial experience with registration of prior PET/CT images. Radiology 2010; 256(1):305-311.
17. Lei P., Dandekar O., Widlus D., Shekhar R. Incorporation of preprocedural PET into CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases: A nonrigid image registration validation study. J Digit Imaging 2010; 23(6):780-792.
18. Krücker J., Xu S., Venkatesan A., et al. Clinical utility of real-time fusion guidance for biopsy and ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22(4):515-524.
19. Kadoury S., Wood B.J., Venkatesan A.M., Dalal S., Xu S., Kruecker J Accuracy assessment of an automatic image-based PET/CT registration for ultrasound-guided biopsies and ablations In: Wong KH, Holmes DR III, eds Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2011 - visualization, image-guided procedures, and modeling Vol 7964 Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2011;79642P-79642P-9.
20. Vogel W.V., Van Dalen J.A., Wiering B., et al. Evaluation of image registration in PET/CT of the liver and recommendations for optimized imaging. J Nucl Med 2007;48(6):910-919. (Pubitemid 46909919)
21. Le Meunier L., Maass-Moreno R., Carrasquillo J.A., Dieckmann W., Bacharach S.L. PET/CT imaging: Effect of respiratory motion on apparent myocardial uptake. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13(6):821-830. (Pubitemid 44890809)
22. Mancosu P., Danna M., Bettinardi V., et al. Semiautomatic method to identify the best phase for gated RT in lung region by 4DPET/ CT acquisitions. Med Phys 2011;38(1): 354-362.
23. Lupi A., Zaroccolo M., Salgarello M., Malfatti V., Zanco P. The effect of 18F-FDG-PET/CT respiratory gating on detected metabolic activity in lung lesions. Ann Nucl Med 2009; 23(2):191-196.
24. Fitzpatrick JM Fiducial registration error and target registration error are uncorrelated In: Miga MI, Wong KH, eds Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2009 - visualization, image-guided procedures, and modeling Vol 7261 Bellingham, Wash: SPIE-the International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE Medical Imaging 2009;1-12.
25. Fitzpatrick J.M. The role of registration in accurate surgical guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010;224(5):607-622.