The relationship between motivation and achievement in interdependent situations

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 622-633

  Johnson, David W ^a   Johnson, Roger T ^a   Roseth, Cary ^b   Shin, Tae Seob ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906848079     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12280     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Atkinson, J. (1964). An introduction to achievement motivation. New York: Van Nostrand.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Blank, W. (1997). Authentic instruction. In W. E. Blank & S. Harwell (Eds.), Promising practices for connecting high school to the real world (pp. 15-21). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 586.
4. Cooper, H. (2007). The battle over homework (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
5. Cooper, H. M., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-151.
7. Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
8. Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18, 12-19.
9. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
10. Eccles, J., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment: Effects of achievement motivation. In J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 283-331). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Back Bay Books.
12. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3-13.
13. Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300-312.
14. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
15. Johnson, D. W. (1970). The social psychology of education. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
16. Johnson, D. W. (2003). Social interdependence: The interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58, 931-945.
17. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213-240.
18. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Motivational processes in cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning situations. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Its theory and practice (pp. 249-286). New York: Academic Press.
19. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
20. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Student motivation in cooperative groups: Social interdependence theory. In R. Gillies & A. Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 136-176). New York: Routledge Falmer.
21. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 285-358.
22. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365-379.
23. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47-62.
24. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (2013). Cooperation in the Classroom (9th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
25. Kushman, J. W., Sieber, C., & Heariold-Kinney, P. (2000). This isn't the place for me: School dropout. In D. Capuzzi & D. R. Gross (Eds.), Youth at risk: A prevention resource for counselors, teachers, and parents (3rd ed., pp. 471-507). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
26. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis: Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition-performance relation: A meta-analysis and a test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1035-1070.
29. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
30. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128-150.
31. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
32. Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 129-143.
33. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Rawsthorne, L. J., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 326-344.
35. Rolland, R. G. (2012). Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in middle and secondary schools: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 82, 396-435.
36. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. M. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). The relationship between interpersonal relationships and achievement within cooperative, competitive, and individualistic conditions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223-246.
38. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. M. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-282). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39. Skinner, B. E. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97.
40. Stanne, M., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Social interdependence and motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 133-154.
41. Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349.
42. Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 170-182.
43. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
44. Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754-763.
45. Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198-1209.
46. Woods, E. G. (1995). Reducing the dropout rate. In School Improvement Research Series (SIRS): Research you can use (Close-up No. 17). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved October 2, 2000, from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/9/c017.html