The greater scattering phenomenon beyond bradford's law in patent citation

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1917-1928

  Huang, Mu Hsuan ^a   Huang, Wei Tzu ^a   Chang, Cheng Ching ^a   Chen, Dar Zen ^a   Lin, Chang Pin ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIQUID CRYSTALS;

BRADFORD'S LAW; PATENT ANALYSIS; PATENT CITATION; SCATTERING PATTERN; SCATTERING PHENOMENON;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84906832843     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23092     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Ashton, B., & Sen, R. (1988). Using patent information in technology business planning: I. Research Technology Management, 31, 42-46
2. Atallah, G., & Rodriguez, G. (2006). Indirect patent citation. Scientometrics, 67(3), 437-465
3. Banerjee, P., Gupta, B.M., & Garg, K.C. (2000). Patent statistics as indicators of competition an analysis of patenting in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 47(1), 95-116
4. Barrios, M., Borrego, A., Vilagines, A., Olle, C., & Somoza, M. (2008). A bibliometric study of psychological research on tourism. Scientometrics, 77(3), 453-467
5. Basu, A. (1992). Hierarchical distributions and Bradford's Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(7), 494-500
6. Bensman, S.J. (1982). Bibliometric laws and library usage as social phenomena. Library Research, 4, 279-312
7. Bessen, J. (2008). The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945
8. Bookstein, A. (1993). Towards a multi-disciplinary Bradford law. Scientometrics, 30(1), 353-361
9. Braam, R.R., Moed, H.F., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251
10. Bradford, S.C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subject. Engineering, 137(3550), 86-86
11. Breitzman, A.F., & Mogee, M.E. (2002). The many applications of patent analysis. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 187-205 (Pubitemid 34752100)
12. Brookes, B.C. (1973). Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis. Library Trends, 22(1), 18-43
13. Brooks, T.A. (1990). Clustering in comprehensive bibliographies and related literatures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3), 183-192
14. Chan, L.K.C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431-2459
15. Chang, Y.W. (2012). Tracking scientometric research in Taiwan using bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 10(2), 1-20
16. Chen, Y.S., Chong, P.P., & Tong, M.Y. (1995). Dynamic behavior of Bradford's Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(5), 370-383
17. Choung, J.Y. (1998). Patterns of innovation in Korea and Taiwan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(4), 357-365
18. Coleman, S.R. (1993). Bradford distributions of social-science bibliographies varying in definitional homogeneity. Scientometrics, 27(1), 75-91
19. Collins, P., & Wyatt, S. (1988). Citation in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy, 17(2), 65-74
20. Criscuolo, P., & Verspagen, B. (2008). Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37(10): 1892-1908
21. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process. London: Taylor Graham.
22. Den, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32
23. Deng, G., & Lin, W. (2012). Citation analysis and bibliometric approach for ant colony optimization from 1996 to 2010. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6229-6237
24. Egghe, L. (1987). Pratt's measure for some bibliometric distributions and its relation with the 80/20 rule. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(4), 288-297
25. Faba-Perez, C., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2003). "Situation" distributions and Bradford's Law in a closed web space. Journal of Documentation, 59(5), 558-580 (Pubitemid 37249634)
26. Fischer, M.M., & Varga, A. (2003). Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science, 37(2), 303-322 (Pubitemid 36762028)
27. Gambardella, A., Harhoff, D., & Verspagen, B. (2008). The value of European patents. CEPR Discussion Papers No. DP6848, London: CEPR
28. Garfield, E. (1964). Can citation indexing be automatic? Essay of Information Scientist, 1, 84-90
29. Garfield, E. (1984). Patent citation indexing and the notions of novelty, similarity, and relevance. Essays of an Information Scientist, 7, 536-542
30. Garg, K.C., Praveen, S., & Lalita, S. (1992). Bradford's Law in relation to the evolution of a field: A case study of solar power research. Scientometrics, 27(2), 253-263
31. Gay, C., & Le Bas, C. (2005). Uses without too many abuses of patent citations or the simple economics of patent citations as a measure of value and flows of knowledge. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 333-338
32. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1985). Price distribution. An exact formulation of Price's "square root law." Scientometrics, 7, 211-219
33. Gordon, A. (2010). Can terrorism become a scientific discipline? A diagnostic study. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 3(3), 437-458
34. Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
35. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 1661-1707
36. Groos, O.V. (1967). Bradford's Law and Keenan-Atherton data. American Documentation, 18(1), 46
37. Hall, B.H., Jaffe A.B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A first look. Economic working paper E00-277. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley
38. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A.B.,&Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools.NBERworking paper 8494. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
39. Hall, B.H., & Trajtenberg, M. (2004). Uncovering GPTS with patent data. NBER working paper 10901. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
40. Haupt, R., Kloyer, M., & Lange, M. (2007). Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development. Research Policy, 36(3), 387-398 (Pubitemid 46436100)
41. Heine, M.H. (1998). Bradford ranking conventions and their application to a growing literature. Journal of Documentation, 54(3), 303-331
42. Huang, M.H. (2011). A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: from a research evaluation perspective. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(1), 1-25
43. Huang, M.H., Chang, H.W., & Chen, D.Z. (2012). The trend of concentration in scientific research and technological innovation: A reduction of the predominant role of the U.S. in world research & technology. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 457-468
44. Hubert, J.J. (1977). Bibliometric models for journal productivity. Social Indicators Research, 4, 441-473
45. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1992). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidence by patent citations. NBER working paper 3993, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
46. Janczura, J., & Weron, R. (2012). Black swans or dragon kings? A simple test for deviations from the power law. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 205(1), 79-93
47. Jena, K.L., Swain, D.K., & Sahu, S.B. (2012). Scholarly communication of the Electronic Library from 2003-2009: A bibliometric study. The Electronic Library, 30(1), 103-119
48. Katz, J.S., & Katz, L. (1999). Power laws and athletic performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 467-476 (Pubitemid 29281370)
49. Kayal, A.A., & Waters, R.C. (1999). An empirical evaluation of the technology cycle time indicator as a measure of the pace of technological progress in superconductor technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46, 127-131
50. Lanjouw, J.O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114, 441-465 (Pubitemid 38516955)
51. Leimkuhler, F.F. (1967). The Bradford distribution. Journal of Documentation, 23, 197-207
52. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 28-32 (Pubitemid 40078225)
53. Lichtenberg, F., & Virabhak, S. (2002). Using patents data to map technical change in health-related areas. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. OECD Publishing
54. Looy, B.V., Zimmermann, E., Leugellers, R., Verbeek, A., Mello, J., & Debackere, K. (2003). Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? An exploratory investigation of 10 scienceintensive technology domains. Scientometrics, 57 (3), 335-367
55. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435-444
56. Meyer, M. (2000). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49(1), 93-123
57. Mishral, P.N., Panda, K.C., & Goswami, N.G. (2010). Citation analysis and research impact of National Metallurgical Laboratory, India during 1972-2007:Acase study.Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(1), 91-113
58. Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.
59. Ohniwa, R.L., Denawa, M., Kudo, M., Nakamura, K., & Takeyasu, K. (2004). Perspective factor:Anovel indicator for the assessment of journal quality. Research Evaluation, 13(3), 175-180 (Pubitemid 41052854)
60. PTMT. (2013). Patent counts by class by year. Retrieved from: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cbcby.htm
61. Pope, A. (1975). Bradford's Law and the periodical literature of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(4), 207-213
62. Pouris, A. (2005). Transport research in SouthAfrica:Aquantitative assessment. Science and Public Policy, 32(3), 221-224
63. Rao, I.K. (1998). An analysis of Bradford multipliers and a model to explain low of scattering. Scientometrics, 41(1-2), 93-100 (Pubitemid 128459664)
64. Regolini, A., Gentilini, E., Baligand, M.-P., & Jannes-Ober, E. (2012). "Sustainable management" of commercial electronic research resources and of its use in bibliometrics. Library Management, 34(1/2), 31-39
65. Sampat, B.N., & Ziedonis, A.A. (2005). patent citations and the economic value of patents: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 277-298). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
66. Schultz, L.I., & Joutz, F.L. (2010). Methods for identifying emerging general purpose technologies: A case study of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics, 85, 155-170
67. Seglen, P.O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (9), 628-638
68. Shadish, W.R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Sengupta, S.K. (1995). Author judgments about works they cite-three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25, 477-498
69. Stolpe, M. (2002). Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: The case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy, 31(7), 1181-1198
70. Tamada, S., Naito, Y., Kodama, F., Gemba, K., & Suzuki, J. (2006). Significant difference of dependence upon scientific knowledge among different technologies. Scientometrics, 68(2), 289-302 (Pubitemid 44597404)
71. Thomas, P., & Breitzman, A. (2006). A method for identifying hot patents and linking them to government-funded scientific research. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 145-152 (Pubitemid 44671377)
72. Thomas, P., McMillan, G.S., & Abington, P.S. (2001). Using science and technology indicators to manage R&D as a business. Engineering Management, 13(3), 9-14 (Pubitemid 33760300)
73. Thomson Reuters (n.d.). Web of Knowledge: User tips. Retrieved from: http://interest.science.thomsonreuters.com/content/WOKUserTips-201011-SEA
74. Van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Critical comments on institute for scientific information impact factors: A sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 489-498 (Pubitemid 30544706)
75. Van Raan, A. (1999). Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics, 45(3), 419
76. Vickery, B.C. (1948). Bradford law of scattering. Journal of Documentation, 4(1), 199-203
77. Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics, 12, 47-72
78. Vinkler, P. (2009). The pi-index: A new indicator for assessing scientific impact. Journal of Information Science, 35(5), 602-612
79. Weinstein, R., & Huang, S. (1999). Valuing patents and intangible assets in the semiconductor industry. The Licensing Journal, 19(2), 8-13
80. Weinstock, N. (1971). Citation indexes. In A. Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (pp. 16-41). New York: Marcel Dekker.
81. Wilson, P. (1995). Unused relevant information in research and development. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 45-51
82. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2011). 2011 World intellectual property indicators. Retrieved from: http://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/ intproperty/941/wipo-pub-941-2011.pdf
83. Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2005). A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72, 145-160 (Pubitemid 40106471)