Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development

Research Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 387-398

  Haupt, Reinhard ^a   Kloyer, Martin ^a   Lange, Marcus ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Pacemaker technology; Patent indicators; Technology life cycle

Indexed keywords

PACEMAKERS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SURVEYING;

PACEMAKER TECHNOLOGY; PATENT INDICATORS; TECHNOLOGY LIFE CYCLE;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 33947257810     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abernathy W., and Utterback J. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80 (1978) 40-47
2. Achilladelis B. The dynamics of technological innovation: the sector of antibacterial medicines. Research Policy 22 (1993) 279-308
3. Achilladelis B., Schwarzkopf A., and Cines M. The dynamics of technological innovation: the case of the chemical industry. Research Policy 19 (1990) 1-34
4. Agarwal R. Evolutionary trends of industry variables. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (1998) 511-525
5. Albert M.B., Avery D., Narin F., and McAllister P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy 20 (1991) 251-259
6. Andersen B. The hunt for S-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: a patent study. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9 (1999) 487-526
7. Ashton W., Campbell R., and Levine L. Patent Analysis as a Technology Forecasting Tool (1983), Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, WA
8. Bauer F. Datenanalyse mit SPSS. second ed. (1986), Auflage, Berlin
9. Blankenstein, C., 1988. Die Patentanmeldung in der Praxis. Freiburg.
10. Breitzman A., Thomas P., and Cheney M. Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis. R&D Management 32 (2002) 1-10
11. Brockhoff K., Ernst H., and Hundhausen E. Gains and pains from licensing-patent portfolios as strategic weapons in the cardiac rhythm management industry. Technovation 19 (1999) 605-614
12. Callon M. The state and technical innovation: a case study of the electrical vehicle in France. Research Policy 9 (1980) 358-376
13. Campbell R.S. Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool. World Patent Information 5 (1983) 137-143
14. Campbell R.S. Patenting the future. A new way to forecast changing technology. Futurist 17 6 (1983) 62-67
15. Carpenter M., Narin F., and Woolf P. Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information 3 (1981) 160-163
16. Debackere K., Verbeek A., Luwel M., and Zimmermann E. Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology-II: the multiple uses of technometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews 4 (2002) 213-231
17. Driks J.J. A strategy for patent mapping. LES Nouvelles 33 3 (1998) 97-98
18. Ford D., and Ryan C. Taking technology to market. Harvard Business Review 59 3 (1981) 117-126
19. Glazier S.C. Inventing arround your competitors patents. Managing intellectual property. Managing Intellectual Property, o. Jg. 4 (1995) 10-14
20. Glazier, S.C., 1997. Patent Strategies for Business, third ed., LBI Law & Business Institute, Waldorf, Maryland.
21. Gort M., and Klepper S. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal 92 (1982) 630-653
22. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., 2001. The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools, NBER Working Paper No. 8498.
23. Harhoff D., Scherer F., and Vopel K. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy 32 (2003) 1343-1363
24. Harrison, S., Rivette, K., 1998. The IP portfolio as a competitive tool, in: Sullivan, P.H. (Hrsg.), Profiting from Intellectual Capital. Extracting Value from Innovation. New York, pp. 119-127.
25. Henderson R., Jaffe A., and Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review Of Economics And Statistics (1998) 119-127
26. Ihnen J.L. A patent strategy for genomic and research tool patents. Are there any differences between the USA, Europe and Japan?. Drug Discovery Today 5 12 (2000) S.554-S.559
27. Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., and Fogarty M. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings (May 2000) 215-218
28. Knight H.J. Patent Strategy for Researchers and Research Managers. second ed. (2001), Chichester et al.
29. Lanjouw J.O., and Schankerman M. The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators (1999), NBER
30. Lerner J. The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1994) 319-333
31. Mansfield E. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29 (1961) 741-766
32. McGahan A., and Silverman B. How does innovative activity change as industries mature?. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 (2001) 1141-1160
33. Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29 (2000) 409-434
34. Miele, A.L., 2000. Patent Strategy. The Manager's Guide to Profiting from Patent Portfolios, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
35. Narin F., Noma E., and Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy 16 (1987) 143-155
36. Reitzig, M., 2002. Die Bewertung von Patentrechten. Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse aus Unternehmenssicht, Wiesbaden.
37. Rings, R., 2000. Patentbewertung. Methoden und Faktoren zur Wertermittlung technischer Schutzrechte. GRUR 10, pp. 839-848.
38. Schickedanz, W., 2000. Die Formulierung von Patentansprüchen. Deutsche, europäische und amerikanische Praxis, München.
39. Silverberg G., Dosi G., and Orsenigo L. Innovation, diversity and diffusion: a self-organisation model. The Economic Journal 98 (1988) 1032-1054
40. Sorenson O., and Fleming L. Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy 33 (2004) 1615-1634
41. Suhr, C., 2000. Patentliteratur und ihre Nutzung. Der Leitfaden zu den Quellen technischer Kreativität, Renningen-Mahlsheim.
42. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1990) 172-187
43. Valle, D., 1996. Der sachliche Schutzbereich des europäischen Patents, Frankfurt am Main.
44. Welte, S., 1991. Der Schutz von Pioniererfindungen, Köln.
45. Witte J., and Vollrath U. Praxis der Patent- und Gebrauchsmusteranmeldung, 5 (2002), Auflage, Köln