Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 402-408

  Stapleton, Brandon M ^a   Lin, Wei Shao ^b   Ntounis, Athanasios ^b   Harris, Bryan T ^b   Morton, Dean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

CANINE TOOTH; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE; DEVICES; FEMALE; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PARTIAL DENTURE; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROCEDURES; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH LOSS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, TEMPORARY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOOTH LOSS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84906809874     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bornstein MM, Al Nawas B, Kuchler U, Tahmaseb A. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:78-83.
2. J. D'haese, T. Van De Velde, A. Komiyama, M. Hultin, and H. De Bruyn Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14 2012 321 335
3. M. Cassetta, L.V. Stefanelli, M. Giansanti, and S. Calasso Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27 2012 655 663
4. D. Schneider, P. Marquardt, M. Zwahlen, and R.E. Jung A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry Clin Oral Implants Res 20 suppl 4 2009 73 86
5. E.O. de Almeida, E.P. Pellizzer, M.C. Goiatto, R. Margonar, E.P. Rocha, and A.C. Freitas Jr. et al. Computer-guided surgery in implantology: review of basic concepts J Craniofac Surg 21 2010 1917 1921
6. M. Ramasamy, P. Giri, R. Raja, N. Subramonia, M.M. Karthik, and R. Narendrakumar Implant surgical guides: from the past to the present J Pharm Bioallied Sci 5 suppl 1 2013 S98 S102
7. G. Orentlicher, and M. Abboud Guided surgery for implant therapy Dent Clin North Am 55 2011 715 744
8. A. Sicilia, and D. Botticelli Working Group 3. Computer-guided implant therapy and soft- and hard-tissue aspects: the Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012 Clin Oral Implants Res 23 suppl 6 2012 157 161
9. K.M. D'Souza, and M.A. Aras Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review J Oral Implantol 38 2012 643 652
10. A. Azari, and S. Nikzad Computer-assisted implantology: historical background and potential outcomes-a review Int J Med Robot 4 2008 95 104
11. M. Jabero, and D.P. Sarment Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review Implant Dent 15 2006 135 142
12. R.E. Jung, D. Schneider, J. Ganeles, D. Wismeijer, M. Zwahlen, and C.H. Hämmerle et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24 suppl 2009 92 109
13. W.S. Lin, B.T. Harris, E. Ozdemir, and D. Morton Maxillary rehabilitation with a CAD/CAM-fabricated, long-term interim and anatomic contour definitive prosthesis with a digital workflow: a clinical report J Prosthet Dent 110 2013 1 7
14. T. Joda, J.G. Wittneben, and U. Brägger Digital implant impressions with the "Individualized Scanbody Technique" for emergence profile support Clin Oral Implants Res 25 2014 395 397
15. W.S. Lin, B.T. Harris, and D. Morton The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone J Prosthet Dent 109 2013 187 191
16. W.S. Lin, B.T. Harris, and D. Morton Use of implant-supported interim restorations to transfer periimplant soft tissue profiles to a milled polyurethane definitive cast J Prosthet Dent 109 2013 333 337
17. Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants [published online August 14, 2013]. Clin Oral Implants Res. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/clr.12234.
18. S.J. Lee, R.X. Macarthur 4th, and G.O. Gallucci An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions J Prosthet Dent 110 2013 420 423
19. W.S. Lin, B.T. Harris, A. Zandinejad, and D. Morton Use of digital data acquisition and CAD/CAM technology for the fabrication of a fixed complete dental prosthesis on dental implants J Prosthet Dent 111 2014 1 5
20. C.D. Ramsey, and R.G. Ritter Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations J Esthet Restor Dent 24 2012 299 308
21. S.J. Lee, and G.O. Gallucci Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes Clin Oral Implants Res 24 2013 111 115