Comparative analysis of false discovery rate methods in constructing metabolic association networks

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Koo, Imhoi ^a   Yao, Sen ^a   Zhang, Xiang ^a   Kim, Seongho ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; Gaussian graphical model; network construction; random network; scale free network

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 84906653251     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: 17576334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720014500188     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kanehisa M, Goto S, KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes, Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):27-30, 2000.
2. Zhou H, Jin J, Zhang H, Yi B, Wozniak M, Wong L, IntPath - an integrated pathway gene relationship database for model organisms and important pathogens, BMC Syst Biol 6:s2, 2012.
3. Whittaker J, Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, Chichester, England; New York, xiv, p. 448.
4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J Royal Stat Soc Series B-Methodol 57(1):289-300, 1995.
5. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G, Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98(9):5116-5121, 2001.
6. Kramer N, Schafer J, Boulesteix AL, Regularized estimation of large-scale gene association networks using graphical Gaussian models, Bmc Bioinform 10:385, 2009.
7. Pihur V, Datta S, Datta S, Reconstruction of genetic association networks from micro-array data: A partial least squares approach, Bioinformatics 24(4):561-568, 2008.
8. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso, Biostatistics 9(3):432-441, 2008.
9. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics, J Educational Behav Stat 25(1):60-83, 2000.
10. Efron B et al., Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment, J Am Stat Assoc 96(456):1151-1160, 2001.
11. Storey JD, The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the g-value, Anna Stat 31(6):2013-2035, 2003.
12. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D, The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency, Ann Stat 29(4):1165-1188, 2001.
13. Storey JD, Taylor JE, Siegmund D, Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach, J Royal Stat Soc Series B-Statistical Methodol 66:187-205, 2004.
14. Opgen-Rhein R, Strimmer K, From correlation to causation networks: A simple approximate learning algorithm and its application to high-dimensional plant gene expression data, Bmc Syst Biol 1:37, 2007.
15. Tenenhaus A et al., Gene association networks from microarray data using a regularized estimation of partial correlation based on PLS regression, IEEE-ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 7(2):251-262, 2010.
16. Jeong H et al., The large-scale organization of metabolic networks, Nature 407(6804):651-654, 2000.
17. Efron B, Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: The choice of a null hypothesis, J Am Stat Assoc 99(465):96-104, 2004.
18. Kim KI, de Wiel MAV, Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems, Bmc Bioinform 9:114, 2008.
19. Erdös P, Rényi A, On random graphs, I, Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6:290-297. 1959.
20. Barabasi AL, Albert R, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science 286(5439):509-512, 1999.
21. Albert R, Scale-free networks in cell biology, J Cell Sci 118(21):4947-4957, 2005.
22. Newman MEJ, Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results, Phys Rev E 64(1):01613, 2001.
23. Adamic LA et al., Power-law distribution of the World Wide Web, Science 287(5461):2115, 2000.
24. Takahashi DY et al., Discriminating different classes of biological networks by analyzing the graphs spectra distribution, Plos One 7(12):e49949, 2012.
25. Dudoit S, Shaffer JP, Boldrick JC, Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments, Stat Sci 18(1):71-103, 2003.
26. Storey JD, A direct approach to false discovery rates, J Royal Stat Soc Series B-Stat Methodol 64:479-498, 2002.
27. Storey JD, Tibshirani R, Statistical significance for genomewide studies, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100(16):9440-9445, 2003.
28. Holm S, A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, Scandinavian J Stat 6(2):65-70, 1979.
29. Hochberg Y, A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance, Biometrika 75(4):800-802, 1988.
30. Hommel G, A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified bonferroni test, Biometrika 75(2):383-386, 1988.
31. Strimmer K, Fdrtool: A versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates, Bioinformatics 24(12):1461-1462, 2008.
32. Benjamini Y, Liu W, A step-down multiple hypotheses testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence, J Stat Planning Inference 82 (1-2):163-170, 1999.
33. Blanchard G, Roquain E, Two simple su±cient conditions for FDR control, Electronic J Stat 2:963-992, 2008.
34. Wei XL et al., MetSign: A computational platform for high-resolution mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, Anal Chem 83(20):7668-7675, 2011.
35. Zweig MH, Campbell G, Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine, Clin Chem 39(4):561-577, 1993.
36. Faraggi D, Reiser B, Estimation of the area under the ROC curve, StatMed21(20):3093-3106, 2002.