Down and out in Los Angeles and Berlin: The sociospatial exclusion of homeless people

Down and Out in Los Angeles and Berlin: The Sociospatial Exclusion of Homeless People

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-191

  Von Mahs, Jürgen ^a  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906608632     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (258)

1. Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin. 1995. Mitteilung-zur Kenntnisnahme: Über Obdachlosen-plan [Announcement-FYI: Homelessness action plan]. Drs. Nr. 12/494, II. B.33.b. Schlußbericht. Berlin: Kulturbuch Verlag.
2. -. 1996. Besprechung gemäβ § 21 Abs. 5 GO Abghs über Vertreibung von Obdachlosen aus den Bahnhöfen und rechtswidriges Verbringen von Personen an den Stadtrand von Berlin durch die Polizei [Hearing of Berlin's State Parliament pertaining to paragraph 22, section 5 of public order law regarding the displacement of homeless people from railroad stations and the unlawful deportation of people to the urban fringe through the police]. Wortprotokoll des Auschuß für Soziales, 7. Sitzung am 3.06.96, Soz 13/7. Berlin: Kulturbuch Verlag.
3. -. 1999. Mitteilung-zur Kenntnisnahme: Leitlinien und Manahmen-bzw. Hand-lungsplan der Wohnungslosenhilfe und -politik in Berlin. Schlubericht [Announce-ment-FYI: Guidelines and measures or action plan of homeless assistance and policy in Berlin. Final report]. Drs. Nr. 13/4095. Berlin: Kulturbuch Verla-g.
4. -. 2008. Kleine Anfrage des Abgeordenten Gregor Hoff man (CDU) Fortschreibung der Leitlinien zur Wohnungslosenpolitik [Hearing request by Rep. Gregor Hoffmann (CDU) from 05.22.2008 about continuation of guidelines for homeless people]. Druck-sache 16/12 170. Berlin: Kulturbuch Verlag.
5. Acosta, O., and P. Toro. 2000. Let's ask the homeless people themselves: A needs assessment based on a probability sample of adults. American Journal of Community Psychology 28(3):343-366.
6. AK Wohnungsnot. 1996. Denn sie wissen, was sie tun. Thesenpapier zur Aktionswoche vom 28.10.96-07.11.96. Berlin: AK Wohnungsnot. Available at http://ak-wohnungsnot.de/home.
7. -. 2007. Statements des Arbeitskreises Wohnungsnot zur Überarbeitung der Leitlinien, July. Available at http://ak-wohnungsnot.de/home/.
8. Albrecht, U. 1994. Los Angeles und New York-eine Metropolenperspektive für Berlin? In Hauptstadt Berlin, Band 1: Nationale Hauptstadt europäische Metropole, ed. Süß, 248-263. W. Berlin: Berlin Verlag.
9. Alcock, P., and G. Craig, eds. 2001. International social policy: Welfare regimes in the developed world. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
10. Alexander, J., and B. Weiner. 1998. The adoption of the corporate governance model by nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 8(3):233-242.
11. Amster, R. 2008. Lost in space: The criminalization, globalization, and urban ecology of homelessness. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
12. Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg. 2011. Regionaler Sozialbericht Berlin und Brandenburg. Potsdam: Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg.
13. Avramov, D., ed. 1995. Homelessness in the European Union: Social and legal context of housing exclusion in the 1990s. Brussels: FEANTSA.
14. -. 1999. Coping with homelessness: Issues to be tackled and best practices in Europe. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
15. BAG Wohnungslosenhilfe. 2001. Für eine bürger- und gemeindenahe Wohnungslosenhilfe: Grundsatzprogramm der Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Wohnungslosenhilfe e. V. Bielefeld, Germany: BAG Wohnungslosenhilfe.
16. -. 2009. BAG Informationen: Zahl der Wohnungslosen [BAG Information: Numbers of homeless people]. Bielefeld, Germany: BAG Wohnungslosenhilfe.
17. -. 2010. BAG Informationen: Zahl der Wohnungslosen [BAG Information: Numbers of homeless people]. Bielefeld, Germany: BAG Wohnungslosenhilfe.
18. -. 1997. Obdachlosigkeit-eine gesamtgesellschaftliche Herausforderung: Beschluß-empfehlung und Bericht des Ausschusses für Raumordnung, Bauwesen und Städte-bau zu dem Bericht der Bundesregierung über Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung der Obdachlosigkeit [Homelessness-a challenge for society: Recommendations and report of the committees for spatial order, construction, and urban development on the report of the federal government on measures to combat homelessness]. Wohnungslos 3(97):125-128.
19. Baker, S. 1994. Gender, ethnicity, and homelessness. American Behavioral Scientist 37(4):476-504.
20. Bauer, R. 1980. Obdachlos in Marioth: Von der Notunterkunftzum "modernen Asyl." Wein-heim, Germany: Belz Verlag.
21. Baumohl, J., ed. 1996. Homelessness in America. Phoenix: Oryx Press.
22. Baumohl, J., and R. Huebner. 1991. Alcohol and other drug problems among the homeless: Research, practice and future directions. Housing Policy Debate 2(3):837-866.
23. Belina, B. 2003. Evicting the undesirables: The idealism of public space and the materialism of the bourgeois state. Belgeo 3(2):47-62.
24. -. 2007. From disciplining to dislocation: Area bans in recent urban policing in Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies 14(4):321-336.
25. Bennett, S. 1999. Crossing the line: Experiences of the formerly homeless living past homelessness. Ph. D. diss., University of San Diego.
26. Beratungsstelle für Wohnungslose. 1996. Jahresbericht 1996. Beratungsstelle für Wohnungs-lose, Lewetzowstrasse. Berlin: Caritasverband.
27. Berthold, M., ed. 1998. Wege aus dem Ghetto⋯. In der Krise des Sozialstaates muss sich die Wohnungslosenhilfe neu orientieren: Dokumentation der Bundestagung 1997 der BAG Wohnungslosenhilfe. Bielefeld, Germany: Verlag Soziale Hilfe.
28. Blair, T., and G. Schröder. 1999. Europe: The third way/Die neue Mitte. Available at http://www.labour.org.uk/views/items/00000053.html.
29. Blasi, G., and F. Stuart. 2008. Has the Safer Cities Initiative in Skid Row reduced serious crime? Los Angeles: UCLA School of Law.
30. Blum, E., ed. 1996. Wem gehört die Stadt? Armut und Obdachlosigkeit in Metropolen [Who owns the city? Poverty and homelessness in metropolitan areas]. Basel, Switzerland: Lenos.
31. Brenner, N. 2004. Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960-2000. Review of International Political Economy 11(3):447-488.
32. Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. Cities and geographies of actually existing neolib-eralism. Antipode 34(3):349-379.
33. Bundesagentur für Arbeit. 2010a. Arbeitsmarkt in Deutschland: Zeitreihen bis 2009 [The German labor market: Time series until 2009]. Nuremberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit, Statistik Datenzentrum.
34. -. 2010b. Formulare für Arbeitslosengeld II. Available at http://www.arbeitsagentur.de/nn-26642/Navigation/zentral/Formulare/Buerger/ Arbeitslosengeld-II/Arbeitslosengeld-II-Nav.html.
35. Burnam, A., and P. Koegel. 1988. Methodology for obtaining a representative sample of homeless persons: The Skid Row study. Evaluation Review 12(2):117-152.
36. Burns, P., D. Flaming, and B. Haydamack. 2004. Homeless in L. A.: A working paper for the 10-year plan to end homelessness in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles: Economic Roundtable. Available at http://www.economicrt.org.
37. Burt, M. 2008. Evaluation of LA's HOPE: Ending chronic homelessness through employment and housing: Final report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
38. Burt, M., L. Aron, E. Lee, and J. Valente. 2001. Helping America's homeless: Emergency shelter or affordable housing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
39. Busch-Geertsema, V. 2002. When homeless people are allowed to decide by themselves: Rehousing homeless people in Germany. European Journal of Social Work 5(1):5-19.
40. -. 2003. The changing role of the state in housing and social policy. Thematic Paper for the European Observatory on Homelessness. Bremen: FEANTSA.
41. -. 2005. Does rehousing lead to reintegration? Follow-up studies of re-housed homeless people. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 18(2):205-226.
42. -. 2006. Hartz IV: Folgen und Risiken für das Wohnen einkommensschwacher und sozial ausgegrenzter Bürgerinnen und Bürger [Hartz IV: Consequences and risks for housing poor and excluded citizens]. In Integration statt Ausgrenzung-Gerechtig-keit statt Almosen: Herausforderungen für eine bürger- und gemeindenahe Wohnungs-losenhilfe. Heft 58, Reihe Materialien zur Wohnungslosenhilfe [Integration instead of exclusion-justice instead of handouts: Challenges for community and citizenship-based homeless assistance], Working Paper 58, ed. W. Rosenke, 88-102. Bielefeld, Germany: BAG Wohnungslosenhilfe.
43. -. 2008. Urban governance, homelessness and exclusion: Homelessness and access to space in Germany. In In my caravan, I feel like Superman: Essays in honour of Henk Meert, 1963-2006, ed. J. Doherty and B. Edgar, 31-48. Brussels: FEANTSA.
44. -. 2010. Defining and measuring homelessness. In Homelessness research in Europe: Festschrift for Bill Edgar and Joe Doherty, ed. E. O'Sullivan, V. Busch-Geertsema, D. Quilgars, and N. Pleace, 19-39. Brussels: FEANTSA.
45. Busch-Geertsema, V., and J. Evers. 2006. Auswirkungen der Hartz-Gesetzgebung auf die Hilfe in Wohnungsnotfällen in Schleswig-Holstein: Ergebnisse der ersten Erhebungs-welle (Winter 2005-2006) [The impact of Hartz legislation on housing emergency assistance in Schleswig-Holstein: Results of the first wave, winter 2005-2006]. Bremen: Gesellschaft für innovatives Sozialforschung und Sozialplanung.
46. Busch-Geertsema, V., J. Evers, and E.-U. Ruhstrat. 2005. Wirksamkeit persönlicher und wirtschaftlicher Hilfe by der Prävention von Wohnungslosigkeit [Effectiveness of personal and economic assistance in the prevention of homelessness]. Bremen: Gesell-schaft für innovatives Sozialforschung und Sozialplanung.
47. Busch-Geertsema, V., and S. Fitzpatrick. 2009. Effective homelessness prevention? Explaining reductions in homelessness in Germany and England. European Journal of Homelessness 2:69-96.
48. Busch-Geertsema, V., and E.-U. Ruhstrat. 1997. Wohnungslosigkeit in Ostdeutschland: Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojektes in Sachsen-Anhalt. Nachrichtendienst des Deutschen Vereins, Heft 11 /1997.
49. Cameron, A. 2007. Geographies of welfare and exclusion: Reconstituting the "public." Progress in Human Geography 31:519-526.
50. Claasen, J., ed. 1999. Comparative social policy: Concepts, theories and methods. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
51. Claasen, J., and R. Freeman, eds. 1994. Social policy in Germany. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
52. Clarke, J., and F. F. Piven. 2001. United States: An American welfare state? In International social policy: Welfare regimes in the developed world, ed. P. Alcock and G. Craig, 26-44. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
53. Conley, D. 1996. Getting it together: Social and institutional obstacles to getting off the streets. Sociological Forum 11(1):25-40.
54. Continuum of Care. 1996. A report on the new federal policy to address homelessness: Summary of findings. Gaithersburg, MD: Community Connections.
55. Corday, D., and G. Pion. 1997. What's behind the numbers? Definitional issues in counting the homeless. In Understanding homelessness: New policy and research perspectives, ed. D. Culhane and S. Hornburg, 69-99. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
56. Cousineau, M. 1993. A profile of urban encampments in central Los Angeles. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Coalition to End Homelessness.
57. Culhane, D., and S. Metraux. 1997. Where to from here: A policy research agenda based on the analysis of administrative data. In Understanding homelessness: New policy and research perspectives, ed. D. Culhane and S. Hornburg, 341-360. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
58. Culhane, D., and K. Smith. 1997. The anchor system for homeless services: An information system for the continuum of case information and service implementation resource guide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
59. Dalet, D. 2012. Germany > Berlin: Boundaries, districts, names. D-Maps.com. Available at http://d-maps.com/carte.php?num-car=6155&lang=en.
60. Daly, G. 1996. Homeless: Policies, strategies, and lives on the street. London: Routledge.
61. Daly, M. 1999. Regimes of social policy in Europe and the patterning of homelessness. In Coping with homelessness: Issues to be tackled and best practices in Europe, ed. D. Avramov, 309-330. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
62. Davis, M. 1990. City of Quartz. London: Verso.
63. Dear, M. 1992. Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association 58:288-300.
64. Dear, M., and L. Takahashi. 1992. Health and homelessness. In Community, environment, and health: Geographic perspectives, ed. M. Hayes, L. Foster, and H. Foster, 112-145. Victoria, BC, Canada: University of Victoria.
65. Dear, M., and J. von Mahs. 1995. Case studies of successful and unsuccessful siting strategies: A guide for providers, planners, advocates and activists-interim report #4. Santa Monica, CA: Campaign for New Community.
66. -. 1997. Housing for the homeless, by the homeless, and of the homeless. In The Architecture of Fear, ed. N. Ellin, 187-200. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. Dear, M., and J. Wolch. 1987. Landscapes of despair. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68. Del Casino, V., and C. Jocoy. 2008. Neoliberal subjectivities, the "new" homelessness, and struggles over spaces of/in the city. Antipode 40:192-199.
69. Department of Public Social Services (DPSS). 2009. Cash aid. Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services. Available at http://dpss.lacounty.gov/new-portal/dpss-cashaid.cfm.
70. der Paritätische Gesamtverband. 2009. Armutsatlas Berlin. Available at http://www.forschung.paritaet.org/index.php?id=1468.
71. Desjarlais, R. 1997. Shelter blues: Sanity and selfhood among the homeless. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
72. Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (DGB). 2010. 5 Jahre Hartz IV-keine Erfolgsstory [5 years of Hartz IV-no success story]. Arbeitsmarkt Aktuell (January): 1-10.
73. DeVerteuil, G. 2003a. Homeless mobility, institutional settings, and the new poverty management. Environment and Planning A 35(2):361-379.
74. -. 2003b. Welfare reform, institutional practices and service delivery settings. Urban Geography 24(6):529-550.
75. -. 2004. Systematic inquiry into barriers to researcher access: Evidence from a homeless shelter. Professional Geographer 56(3):372-380.
76. -. 2005. The relationship between government assistance and housing outcomes among extremely low-income individuals: A qualitative inquiry in Los Angeles. Housing Studies 20(3):383-399.
77. -. 2006. The local state and homeless shelters: Beyond revanchism? Cities 23(2):109-120.
78. DeVerteuil, G., W. Lee, and J. Wolch. 2002. New spaces for the local welfare state? The case of general relief in Los Angeles County. Journal of Social and Cultural Geography 3(3):229-246.
79. DeVerteuil, G., M. Marr, and D. Snow. 2009. Any space left ? Homeless resistance by place-type in Los Angeles County. Urban Geography 30(6):633-651.
80. DeVerteuil, G., J. May, and J. von Mahs. 2009. Complexity, not collapse: Recasting geographies of homelessness in a punitive age. Progress in Human Geography 33(5):646-666.
81. Doherty, J., V. Busch-Geertsema, V. Karpuskiene, J. Korhonen, E. O'Sullivan, I. Sahlin, A. Tosi, A. Petrillo, and A. Wygnańska. 2008. Homelessness and exclusion: Regulating public space in European cities. Surveillance and Society 5(3):290-314.
82. Duneier, M. 1999. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
83. Edgar, B., J. Doherty, and H. Meert. 2003. Review on statistics on homelessness in Europe. Brussels: FEANTSA.
84. Edgar, B., J. Doherty, and A. Mina-Coull. 1999. Services for the homeless: Innovation and change in the European Union. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
85. Eick, V. 1996. Mein ist die Stadt⋯: Das Berliner Sicherheitssystem und die Zugangsbe-dingungen der Stadt für Ihre Bewohner [The city is mine⋯: Berlin's security system and access to the city for its residents]. Master's thesis, Otto-Suhr-Institut FU Berlin.
86. -. 1998. Neue Sicherheitsstrukturen im Neuen Berlin: " Warehousing" öff entlichen Raumes und staatlicher Gewalt [New safety structures in the New Berlin: The "Warehousing" of public space and state power]. PROKLA 28(1):95-118.
87. -. 2008. Verlängertes Gewaltmonopol? der kommerzielle Teil der "neuen Sicher-heitsarchitektur" [Extended monopoly of power? The commercial aspect of the "new security architecture"]. Bürgerrechte und Polizei/CILIP 91:61-68.
88. Eick, V., M. Mayer, and J. Sambale, eds. 2003. From welfare to work: Nonprofits and the workfare state in Berlin and Los Angeles. Berlin: JFK Institute, Freie Universität Berlin.
89. Einbinder, S., D. Flaming, Y. Hasenfeld, J. Henly, and J. Wolch. 1995. Jobs, welfare, and homelessness. Los Angeles: Southern California Inter-University Consortium on Homelessness and Poverty.
90. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
91. -. 1996. Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. London: Sage Publications.
92. -. 1999. Social foundations of postindustrial societies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
93. Fernandez, H., S. Harrington, D. Lowery, and B. Erlenbush. 2000. Welfare to worse: The effects of welfare reform in Los Angeles County 1998-2000. Los Angeles Coalition to End Hunger and Homelessness. Available at http://www.peoplesguide.org/lacehh/welfare%20to%20worse.htm.
94. Ferrera, M., and A. C. Hemerijck. 2003. Recalibrating Europe's welfare regimes. In Governing work and welfare in a new economy-European and American experiments, ed. J. Zeitlin, M. David, and D. M. Trubek, 88-128. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
95. Flaming, D., ed. 1995. Jobs, welfare and homelessness. Los Angeles: Southern California Inter-University Consortium on Homelessness and Poverty.
96. Flaming, D., and M. Drayse. 1997a. Homeless workers: A labor market analysis. Los Angeles: Economic Roundtable.
97. -. 1997b. Identifying individuals at risk of homelessness. Los Angeles: Economic Roundtable.
98. Foscarinis, M. 1996. The federal response: The Stuart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act. In Homelessness in America, ed. J. Baumohl, 160-171. Washington, DC: National Coalition for the Homeless.
99. Gallup Organization. 1995. Homeless but not hopeless: A Los Angeles mission report on what Americans believe about homeless people, their problems and possible solutions. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization.
100. Geiger, M., and E. Steinert. 1992. Alleinstehende Frauen ohne Wohnung: Soziale Hinter-gründe, Lebensmilieus, Bewältigungsstrategien, Hilfeangebote. Stuttgart: Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers für Frauen und Jugend, Bd. 5.
101. Gerull, S. 2003. Behördliche Maßnahmen bei drohendem Wohnungsverlust durch Miet-schulden. Berlin: KBW-Fachbuchverlag.
102. Gerull, S., M. Merckens, and C. Dubrow. 2009. Qualitative Stude zu "Erfolg" in der Hilfe nach Par. 67ff SGB XII [Qualitative study about the "success" of assistance on basis of Par. 67ff SGB XII]. Berlin: Alice Salomon Hochschule.
103. Giesbrecht, A. 1987. Wohnungslos-Arbeitslos-Mittellos: Lebensl4aUufe und aktuelle Situa-tionen Nichtseßhafter. Opladen, Germany: Leske und Budrich.
104. Girtler, R. 1990. Vagabunden in der Großstadt: Teilnehmende Beobachtung in der Lebens-welt der Sandler [Vagabonds in the big city: Participant observation in the life world of homeless people]. Vienna: Universität Wien.
105. Glasser, I. 1994. Homelessness in global perspective. Boston: G. K. Hall.
106. Goodin, R., B. Headey, R. Muffels, and H. J. Dirven. 1999. The real worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
107. Greenberg, M., and J. Baumohl. 1996. Income maintenance: Little help now and less on the way. In Homelessness in America, ed. J. Baumohl, 63-78. Washington, DC: National Coalition for the Homeless.
108. Greenhalgh, E., A. Miller, E. Mead, K. Jerome, and J. Minnery. 2004. Recent international and national approaches to homelessness: Final report to the National SAAP Coordination and Development Committee. Queensland, Australia: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Queensland Research Centre.
109. Haber, M., and P. A. Toro. 2004. Homelessness among families, children and adolescents: An ecological developmental perspective. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 7:123-164.
110. Handler, J. 2004. Social citizenship and workfare in the United States and western Europe: The paradox of inclusion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
111. Hardin, B. 1996. Why the road off the road is not paved with jobs. In Homelessness in America, ed. J. Baumohl, 46-62. Washington, DC: National Coalition for the Homeless.
112. Häußermann, H. 1997-1998. Amerikanisierung der deutschen Städte-Divergenz und Konvergenz [Americanization of German cities? Divergences and convergences]. CENTRUM. Jahrbuch für Architektur und Stadt (1997-1998): 92-96.
113. Häußerman, H., and D. Förste. 2009. Monitoring Soziale Stadtentwicklung 2008: Kurzfas-sung [Monitoring urban social development 2008: Short version]. Available at http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/ basisdaten-stadtentwicklung/monitoring/download/2008/Kurzfassung-Monitoring2008. pdf.
114. Hecker, W. 2002. der öffentliche Raum in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland-Bettel- und Alkoholkonsumverbote, Aufenthaltsverbote, Privatisierung: Zum Stand der Entwick-lung [Public space in Germany-anti- panhandling laws and alcohol bans through privatization: Current status]. In Wohnungslosenhilfe: Verbindlich verbunden! Ko-operationen-Verbundsysteme- Bündnisse (Issue 51 of Materialien zur Wohnungs-losenhilfe), ed. M. Berthold, 221-230. Bielefeld, Germany: Verlag Soziale Hilfe.
115. Heilman, J., and M. Dear. 1988. Homelessness: A comparison of national experiences. Working Paper 5, Los Angeles Homelessness Project.
116. Helvie, C., and W. Kunstmann, eds. 1999. Homelessness in the United States, Europe, and Russia: A comparative perspective. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
117. Hermann, S., U. Imme, and G. Meinlschmidt. 1998. Sozialstrukturatlas Berlin 1997: Eine Disaggregierte statistische Sozialraumanalyse [Atlas of Berlin's social structure 1997: A disaggregated statistical socio-spatial analysis]. Senatsverwaltung für Gesundheit, Referat Gesundheitsstatistik, Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Informations- und Kom-munikationstechnik, Datenschutz. Berlin: Verlagsdruckerei.
118. Holzner, C. 2006. Hartz IV fördert Minijobs und krankt an undgenügenden Durchsetz-barkeit der Zumutbarkeitsregeln [Hartz IV proliferates mini-jobs and is ailing from insufficient implementation of acceptability rules]. Ifo Dresden Berichtet 13(2):5-10.
119. Hopper, K. 2003. Reckoning with homelessness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
120. Huber, E., and J. Stephens. 2001. Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
121. Hundhammer, F. 1979. Räumliche Aspekte des Randgruppenproblems: Sozialgeographische Studien zur Situation von Obdachlosen und Sozialhilfeempfängern im städtischen Be-reich. Neusäss/Augsburg, Germany: Paul Kieser Verlag.
122. Husick, T., and J. Wolch. 1990. On the edge? An analysis of homed and homeless applicants for general relief in Los Angeles County. Working Paper 29, Los Angeles Homeless Project.
123. Huth, M., and T. Wright, eds. 1997. International Critical Perspectives on Homelessness. Westport, CT: Praeger.
124. Interagency Council on the Homeless. 1994. Priority home! The federal plan to break the cycle of homelessness. Washington, DC: Interagency Council on the Homeless.
125. Jocoy, C. L., and V. J. Del Casino Jr. 2010. Homelessness, travel behavior, and the politics of transportation mobilities in Long Beach, California. Environment and Planning A 42(8):1943-1963.
126. Kennett, P., ed. 2004. A handbook of comparative social policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
127. Klodawsky, F. 2006. Landscapes on the margins: gender and homelessness. Gender Place and Culture 13(4):365-381.
128. Knecht, M. 1999. Die andre Seite der Stadt: Armut und Ausgrenzung in Berlin [The other side of the city: Poverty and exclusion in Berlin]. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.
129. Knowles, C. 1999. Bedlam on the streets. London: Routledge.
130. Koegel, P. 2004. The course of homelessness. In Encyclopedia of homelessness, ed. D. Levin-son, 247-263. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
131. Krätke, S. 2001. Berlin toward a global city? Urban Studies 38(10):1777-1799.
132. Law, R. 2001. "Not in my city": Local governments and homelessness policies in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Region. Environment and Planning C 19:791-815.
133. Lee, B., B. Link, and P. A. Toro. 1991. Images of homelessness: Public opinion and media portrayals. Housing Policy Debate 2(3):3-36.
134. Leisering, L. 2001. Germany: Reform from within. In International social policy: Welfare regimes in the developed world, ed. P. Alcock and G. Craig, 161-182. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
135. Leisering, L., and S. Leibfried. 1999. Time and poverty in western welfare states: United Germany in perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
136. Leitner, S., and S. Lessenich. 2003. Assessing welfare state change: The German social insurance state between reciprocity and solidarity. Journal of Public Policy 23:325-347.
137. Levinson, D., ed. 2004. Encyclopedia of homelessness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
138. Lewis, J., 1992. Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 2(3):159-173.
139. Linde, C. 2003. Wohnungsmarkt bleibt geteilt: Halbherzige Korrekturen der verfehlten Wohnungsbauförderung. Mieterschutz 1/2003. Available at http://www.wohnungslos-in-berlin.de/texte/ms0301a.htm.
140. Link, B. G., S. Schwartz, R. Moore, J. Phelan, E. Struening, A. Stueve, and M. E. Colten. 1995. Public knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about homeless people: Evidence for compassion fatigue? American Journal of Community Psychology 23(4):533-555.
141. Los Angeles Coalition to End Hunger and Homelessness (LACEHH). 1997. Special welfare reform issue. The Bottom Line: LACEHH Quarterly Newspaper (September).
142. -. 2004. Homelessness, hunger, poverty and housing in Los Angeles: Fact sheet. Available at http://www.lacehh.org.
143. Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA). 2011. Homeless: Greater Los Angeles homeless count report. Los Angeles: Shelter Partnership. Available at http://www.lahsa.org/homelessness-data/reports.asp.
144. Ludwig, R., and J. Neumeyer, eds. 1991. Die narkotisierte Gesellschaft ? Neue Wege in der Drogenpolitik und akzeptierende Drogenarbeit [The narcotic society? New pathways in drug policy and accepting drug treatment]. Marburg: Schüren-Verlag.
145. Lyon-Callo, V. 2001. Making sense of NIMBY: Poverty, power, and community opposition to homeless shelters. City and Society 13:183-209.
146. Marcuse, P. 1988. Neutralizing homelessness. Socialist Review 18:69-86.
147. Marr, M. D., G. DeVerteuil, and D. Snow. 2009. Towards a contextual approach to the place-homeless survival nexus: An exploratory case study of Los Angeles County. Cities 26(6):633-651.
148. May, J. 2004. 12 things wrong with the revanchist city thesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Philadelphia.
149. -. 2008. Of nomads and vagrants: Single homelessness and narratives of home as place. In The Cultural Geography Reader, ed. T. S. Oakes and P. L. Price, 334-342. London: Routledge.
150. Mayer, M. 1995. Los Angeles und Berlin im Vergleich [Los Angeles and Berlin in comparison]. In Los Angeles-Berlin: Stadt der Zukunft, Zukunft der Stadt, ed. F. Sträter, 98-105. Stuttgart: Context.
151. -. 1997. Berlin-Los Angeles: Berlin auf dem Weg zur "Global City"? [Berlin-Los Angeles: Berlin on the way toward a "global city"?]. PROKLA 27(4):519-544.
152. Meinlschmidt, G. 2004. Sozialstrukturatlas Berlin 2003: Ein Instrument der quantita-tiven, interregionalen, intertemporalen Sozialraumanalyse und Planung [Atlas of Berlin's social structure 2003: An instrument of quantitative, interregional, intertemporal socio-spatial analysis and planning]. Senatsverwaltung für Gesundheit, Referat Ge-sundheitsstatistik, Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Informations- und Kommunika-tionstechnik, Datenschutz. Berlin: Verlagsdruckerei.
153. Mitchell, D. 1997. The annihilation of space by law: The roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States. Antipode 29:303-335.
154. -. 1998a. Anti-homeless laws and public space I: Begging and the First Amendment. Urban Geography 19:6-11.
155. -. 1998b. Anti-homeless laws and public space II: Further constitutional issues. Urban Geography 19:98-104.
156. -. 2003. The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Press.
157. -. 2011. Homelessness-American style. Urban Geography 32(7):933-957.
158. Mitchell, D., and N. Heynen. 2009. The geography of survival and the right to the city: Speculations on surveillance, legal innovation, and the criminalization of intervention. Urban Geography 30:611-632.
159. Mishra, R. 1999. Globalization and the welfare state. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.
160. Mühlich-Klinger, I. 2010. Fallstudie "Geschütztes Marktsegment" in Berlin: Konzept, Um-setzung, Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen [Case study "Protected Market Segment" in Berlin: Concept, implementation, results, and experiences]. Darmstadt, Germany: Institute Wohnen und Umwelt.
161. National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP). 2009. California: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash assistance. Available at http://www.nccp.org/profiles/CA-profile-36.html.
162. National Coalition for the Homeless (NCH). 1997. Homelessness in America: Unabated and increasing-a 10-year perspective. Washington, DC: National Coalition for the Homeless.
163. -. 2009. How many people experience homelessness? Washington, DC: National Coalition for the Homeless. Available at http://www.nationalhomeless. org/factsheets/How-Many.html.
164. National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty (NLCHP). 1999. Out of sight-out of mind? A report on anti-homeless laws, litigation, and alternatives in 50 United States cities: 1998. Washington, DC: National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.
165. -. 2011. Criminalizing crisis: The criminalization of homelessness in U. S. cities. Washington, DC: National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.
166. Neale, J. 2001. Homelessness among drug users: A double jeopardy explored. International Journal of Drug Policy 12:353-69.
167. Neubarth, J. 1997. Struktur der Hilfen für wohnungslose Menschen in Berlin: Gegeben-heiten und Visionen [The structure of homeless assistance in Berlin: Realities and reform]. Master's thesis, Free University, Berlin.
168. Neubeck, K., and N. Cazenave. 2001. Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America's poor. London: Routledge.
169. Pape, M. 1996. Obdachlosigkeit in Ost- und Westdeutschland im Vergleich: Dargestellt am Beispiel der Städte Nordhausen und Northeim. Praxis Kultur- und Sozialgeogra-phie 14:105.
170. Passaro, J. 1996. The unequal homeless: Men on the street, women in their place. New York: Routledge.
171. Peck, J. 2001. Workfare states. New York: Guilford Press.
172. Pierson, P., ed. 2001. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
173. Piven, F. F., and J. Clark. 2001. The United States: A welfare state? In International social policy: Welfare regimes in the developed world, ed. P. Alcock and G. Craig, 161-182. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
174. Piven, F. F., and R. Cloward. 1993. Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare, 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books.
175. Podschus, J., and P. Dufeu. 1995. Alcohol dependence among homeless men in Berlin. Sucht 41(5):348-354.
176. Proksch, J. 2011. Soziale Mindestsicherung in Deutschland 2009 [Basic social support in Germany]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.
177. Quadagno, J. 1994. The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
178. Rahimian, A., P. Koegel, and J. Wolch. 1992. A model of homeless migration: Homeless men in Skid Row, Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A 24:1317-1336.
179. Reese, E., G. DeVerteuil, and L. Thach. 2010. "Weak center" gentrification and the contradictions of containment: Deconcentrating poverty in downtown Los Angeles. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34(2):310-327.
180. Robe, C. 1999. Und Raus bist Du! Wie soziale Probleme in der Berliner Innenstadt aus-gegrenzt werden [And you are out! How social problems are excluded in Berlin's inner city]. In Die Andere Seite der Stadt: Armut und Ausgrenzung in Berlin [The other side of the city: Poverty and exclusion in Berlin], ed. M. Knecht, 30-42. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.
181. Rosenke, W. 1996. Weibliche Wohnungsnot: Ausmaß-Ursachen- Hilfsangebote. Woh-nungslos (March): 77-80.
182. -, ed. 2006. Integration statt Ausgrenzung-Gerechtigkeit statt Almosen: Herausforde-rungen für eine bürger- und gemeindenahe Wohnungslosenhilfe. Hef 58, Reihe Mate-rialien zur Wohnungslosenhilfe [Integration instead of exclusion-justice instead of handouts: Challenges for community and citizenship-based homeless assistance. Working Paper 58, 88-102. Bielefeld, Germany: BAG Wohnungslosenhilfe.
183. Rowe, S., and J. Wolch. 1990. Social networks in time and space: Homeless women in Skid Row, Los Angeles. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80(2):184-204.
184. Ruddick, S. 1996. Young and homeless in Hollywood: Mapping social identities. New York: Routledge.
185. Sambale, J., and D. Veith. 1998. Berliner Wagenburgen: Transformation peripherer Räume, Stigmatisierung sozialer Gruppen und die Abwehr von Marginalisierung [Berlin's Trailer Communities: Transformation of peripheral spaces, stigmatization of social groups, and the repulsion of marginality]. In PROKLA 28(100):67-93.
186. Sard, D. 2009. Number of homeless families climbing due to recession: Recovery package should include new housing vouchers and other measures to prevent homelessness. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
187. Schenk, L. 2004. Auf dem Weg zum ewigen Wanderer? Wohnungslose und ihre Institu-tionen [Down-and-out without an end?]. Ph. D. diss., Free University, Berlin. Available at http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/2004/146/indexe.html.
188. Schmid, C., 1990. Die Randgruppe der Stadtstreicher: Im Teufelskreis der Nichtseßhaftig-keit. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag.
189. Schneider, S. 1998. Wohnungslosigkeit und Subjektentwicklung: Biographien, Lebens-lagen und Perspektiven Wohnungsloser in Berlin [Homelessness and the social construction of subjects: Biographies, life circumstances and perspectives of homeless people in Berlin]. Ph. D. diss., Free University, Berlin. Available at http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/zosch/diss/index.html.
190. Schnur, O. 1999. Wohnungsmarkt und Wohnungspolitik in Berlin seit 1990 [Housing market and housing policy in Berlin since 1990]. In Märkte und Strukturen im Wan-del (VI. Konferenz Amsterdam-Berlin), Berliner Geographische Arbeiten 86, ed. M. Schulz and O. Gewand, 1-14. Berlin: Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.
191. Schoeni, R., and P. Koegel. 1998. Economic resources of the homeless: Evidence from Los Angeles. Contemporary Economic Policy 16:295-308.
192. Senatsverwaltung für Gesundheit, Soziales und Verbraucherschutz. 2002. Armut und So-ziale Ungleichheit in Berlin [Poverty and social inequality in Berlin]. Berlin: Verlags-druckerei.
193. Senatsverwaltung für Gesundheit und Soziales. 1997. Empfänger und Leistungen im Bereich Soziales: II. Quartal 1997 [Recipients and services in the area of social policy: 2nd quarter of 1997]. Berlin: Referat Gesundheits- und Sozialstatistik, Gesundheits-bereichterstattung, Epidemiologie, Gesundheitsinformationssysteme.
194. -. 2004. Empfänger und Leistungen im Bereich Soziales: I. Quartal 2004 [Recipients and services in the area of social policy: 1st quarter of 2004]. Berlin: Referat Gesund-heits- und Sozialstatistik, Gesundheitsbereichterstattung, Epidemiologie, Gesundheits-informationssysteme.
195. Senatsverwaltung für Integration, Arbeit und Soziales. 2010. Leistungsbeschreibungen für den Personenkreis nach Par. 67 SGB XII. Berlin: Verlagsdruckerei.
196. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung. 2003. der Berliner Wohnungsmarkt: Ein Bericht. Available at http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/ wohnen/wohnungsmarktbericht/pdf/wohnungdmarkt-bericht.pdf.
197. -. 2004. Berliner Mietspiegel: Abfrageservice [Berlin's rental statistics: Instant data]. Available at http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/ wohnen/mietspiegel/.
198. Shelter Partnership. 1994. A report of implementation plans for the Los Angeles area homeless initiative. Los Angeles: Shelter Partnership.
199. -. 1995. The number of homeless people in Los Angeles City and County: July 1993 to June 1994. Los Angeles: Shelter Partnership.
200. -. 2001. A survey of general relief recipients: Housing, utilization of systems of care, and employability status. Los Angeles: Shelter Partnership.
201. Shinn, M. 2007. International homelessness: Policy, socio-cultural, and individual perspectives. Journal of Social Issues 63:659-679.
202. -. 2009. Ending homelessness for families: The evidence for affordable housing. Washington, DC: National Alliance to End Homelessness.
203. -. 2010. Homelessness, poverty, and social exclusion in the United States and Europe. European Journal of Homelessness 4:19-44.
204. Shinn, M., and S. N. Fischer. 2004. Research on homelessness: Overview. In Encyclopedia of Homelessness, 475-482. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
205. Shinn, M., B. C. Weitzman, D. Stojanovic, J. R. Knickman, L. Jiménez, L. Duchon, S. James, and D. H. Krantz. 1998. Predictors of homelessness among families in New York City: From shelter request to housing stability. American Journal of Public Health 88(11):1651-1657.
206. Shipler, D. 2004. The working poor: Invisible in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
207. Simpson, J., and P. Tepper. 2004. Can the United States end homelessness in ten years? Los Angeles joins the municipal planning movement. Homeless in Europe: The Newsletter of FEANTSA (Spring): 8-11.
208. Smith, N. 1996. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.
209. -. 1998. Giuliani Time: The revanchist 1990s. Social Texts 57(18):1-20.
210. Snow, D., and L. Anderson. 1993. Down on their luck: A study of homeless street people. Berkeley: University of California Press.
211. Spars, G., P. Jacob, and A. M. Werner. 2009. der Berliner Wohnungsmarkt: Ein Standort-vorteil [Berlin's rental market: A locational advantage?]. Wuppertal, Germany: Quaes-tio Forschung und Beratung.
212. Statistisches Landesamt Berlin. 2000. Ten years of unity in Berlin-a narrative and statistical analysis of the unification. Statistische Monatsschrift 1-6(2000):1-164.
213. Stoner, M. 2002. Globalization and urban homelessness. In From Chicago to Los Angeles: Making sense of urban theory, ed. M. Dear, 213-234. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
214. Sträter, F. 1995. Los Angeles-Berlin: Stadt der Zukunft, Zukunftder Stadt. Stuttgart: Context.
215. Stuart, F. 2011. Race, space, and the regulation of surplus labor: Policing African Americans in Los Angeles's Skid Row. Souls 13(2):197-212.
216. Stumberger, R. 2005. Hartz IV-der Ratgeber [Hartz IV-the guide]. Vienna: Linde Verlag.
217. Takahashi, L. 1996. A decade of understanding homelessness in the USA: From characterization to representation. Progress in Human Geography 20(3):291-310.
218. Takahashi, L., M. Dear, and M. Neely. 1989. Characteristics of the homeless population in Downtown Los Angeles, 1988-1989. Working Paper 23, Los Angeles Homelessness Project.
219. Tepper, P. 2004. Homelessness in Los Angeles: A summary of recent research. Los Angeles: Institute for the Study of Homelessness and Poverty at the Weingart Center. Available at http://www.weingart.org/institute/research/ other/pdf/homelessness-in-los-angeles-a-summary-of-recent-research.pdf.
220. Tepper, P., and J. Simpson. 2003. The puzzle of the Los Angeles economy: A look at the last 30 years. Los Angeles: Institute for the Study of Homelessness and Poverty at the Weingart Center. Available at http://www.weingart.org/institute/research/other/pdf/PuzzleLAEconomy.pdf.
221. Theodore, N. 1998. On parallel paths: The Clinton/Blair agenda on the new geopolitics of workfare. Paper presented at the Royal Geographical Society/Institute of British Geographers annual conference, University of Surrey, UK.
222. Thorn, C. 2011. Soft policies of exclusion: Entrepreneurial strategies of ambience and control of public space in Gothenburg, Sweden. Urban Geography 32(7):989-1008.
223. Torck, D. 2001. Voices of homeless people in street newspapers: A cross-cultural exploration. Discourse Society 12(3):371-392.
224. Toro, P. A., ed. 2007. International perspectives on homelessness in developed nations: Special edition. Journal of Social Issues 63(3):461-677.
225. Toro, P. A., C. J. Tompsett, S. Lombardo, P. Philippot, H. Nachtergael, B. Galand, N. Schlienz, N. Stammel, Y. Yabar, M. Blume, L. MacKay, and K. Harvey. 2007. Homelessness in Europe and the United States: A comparison of prevalence and public opinion. Journal of Social Issues 63(3):505-524.
226. United Way of Greater Los Angeles. 1997. State of the county databook Los Angeles 1996-97. Los Angeles: Community Development Commission.
227. U. S. Conference of Mayors. 1998. A status report on hunger and homelessness in America's cities: A 29-city survey December 1997. Washington, DC: U. S. Conference of Mayors.
228. -. 2006. A status report on hunger and homelessness in the American cities. Washington, DC: U. S. Conference of Mayors.
229. -. 2011. Hunger and homelessness survey: A status report on hunger and homelessness in the American cities: A 29-city survey. Washington, DC: U. S. Conference of Mayors.
230. U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2001. Affordable housing shortage in Metro Los Angeles, California. Rockville, MD: HUD.
231. -. 2010. The 2010 annual homeless assessment report to Congress. Washington, DC: HUD.
232. van Kersbergen, K. 1995. Social capitalism: A study of Christian democracy and the welfare state. London: Routledge.
233. Veith, D., and J. Sambale. 1999. Wer drinnen ist, ist draußen: Warum auch in Berlin neuerdings über "Ghettos" debattiert wird [Who isn't in stays out: Why there is a recent debate about "ghettos" in Berlin]. In Die Andre Seite der Stadt: Armut und Ausgrenzung in Berlin, ed. M. Knecht, 42-59. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.
234. Vitale, A. S. 2010. The Safer Cities Initiative and the removal of the homeless. Criminology and Public Policy 9:867-873.
235. von Mahs, J. 2005a. The socio-spatial exclusion of homeless people in Berlin and Los Angeles. American Behavioral Scientist 48(4):926-960.
236. -. 2005b. Different welfare regimes, similar outcomes? The impact of social policy on homeless people's life courses and exit chances in Berlin and Los Angeles. Ph. D. diss., University of Southampton.
237. -. 2011a. Introduction-an Americanization of homelessness in post-industrial societies. Urban Geography 32(7):923-932.
238. -. 2011b. Homelessness in Berlin: Between Americanization and path dependence. Urban Geography 32(7):1023-1043.
239. -. 2012. A "buddy researcher"? Prospects, limitations, and ethical considerations in ethnographic research on homeless people in Berlin. In Professional lives, personal struggles: Ethics and advocacy in research on homeless people, ed. Martha Trenna Valado and Randall Amster. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books: 75-88.
240. von Mahs, J., and D. Mitchell, eds. 2011. The Americanization of homelessness: Special issue. Urban Geography 32(7):923-1043.
241. Vranken, J. 1999. Different policy approaches to homelessness. In Coping with homeless-ness: Issues to be tackled and best practices in Europe, ed. D. Avramov, 331-355. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
242. Wilson, J., and G. Kelling. 1982. Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly (March): 29-38.
243. Winkelby, M., and R. White. 1992. Homeless adults without apparent medical and psychiatric impairment: Onset of morbidity over time. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 43(10):1017-1023.
244. Wolch, J. 1998. America's new urban policy: Welfare reform and the fate of American cities. Journal of the American Planning Association 64:8-11.
245. Wolch, J., and M. Dear. 1987. Landscapes of despair: From deinstitutionalization to home-lessness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
246. -. 1993. Malign neglect: Homelessness in an American city. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
247. Wolch, J., and G. DeVerteuil. 2001. New landscapes of urban poverty management. In TimeSpace: Geographies of temporality, ed. J. May and N. Thrift, 149-168. London: Routledge.
248. Wolch, J., and S. Dinh. 2001. The new poor laws: Welfare reform and the localization of help. Urban Geography 22(5):482-489.
249. Wolch, J., A. Rahimian, and P. Koegel. 1993. Daily and periodic mobility patterns of the urban homeless. Professional Geographer 45:159-169.
250. Wolch, J., and H. Sommer. 1997. Los Angeles in an era of welfare reform: Implications for poor people and community well-being. Los Angeles: Southern California Inter-University Consortium on Homelessness and Poverty.
251. Wolf, J., A., Burnam, P. Koegel, G. Sullivan, and S. Morton. 2001. Changes in subjective quality of life among homeless adults who obtain housing: A prospective evaluation. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 36:391-398.
252. Wong, I. 1997. Patterns of homelessness: A review of longitudinal studies. In Understanding homelessness: New policy and research perspectives, ed. D. Culhane and S. Horn-burg, 135-164. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
253. Wong, I., and I. Pilavin. 1997. A dynamic analysis of homeless-domicile transitions. Social Problems 44(3):408-423.
254. Wright, B. 1996. Pathways off the streets: Homeless people and their use of resources. Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.
255. Wright, J., and A. Donley. 2008. Shelter life for homeless men: Risk or respite. In Home-lessness in America, vol. 1, Faces of Homelessness, ed. R. McNamara, 43-60. Westport, CT: Praeger.
256. Wright, J., B. Rubin, and J. Devine. 1998. Beside the golden door: Policy, politics, and the homeless. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
257. Wright, T. 1997. Out of place: Homeless mobilizations, subcities, and contested landscapes. Albany: State University of New York Press.
258. Zlotnick, C., M. Robertson, and M. Lhiff. 1999. Getting off the streets: Economic resources and residential exits from homelessness. Journal of Community Psychology 27(2):209-224.