The new poor laws: Welfare reform and the localization of help

Urban Geography

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 482-489

  Wolch, Jennifer ^a   Dinh, Sissi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POVERTY ALLEVIATION; SOCIAL POLICY; SOCIAL SECURITY; WELFARE PROVISION; WELFARE REFORM;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035724768     PISSN: 02723638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.22.5.482     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blasi, G., 1987-1988, Litigation strategies for addressing bureaucratic disentitlement. New York University Review of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 16, 591-603.
2. Cope, M., 1997, Responsibility, regulation, and retrenchment: The end of welfare? In L. A. Staeheli, J. E. Kodras, and C. Flint, editors, State Devolution in America: Implications for a Diverse Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 181-205.
3. DeParle, J. 1998, Shrinking welfare rolls leave record high share of minorities. New York Times. July 27, pp. A1, A12.
4. Force, P., Flaming, D., Henley, J. R., and Drayse, M., 1998. By the Sweat of their Brow: Welfare to Work in Los Angeles. Los Angeles, CA: Economic Roundtable.
5. Gallagher, L. J., Gallagher, M., Perese, K., Schreiber, S., and Watson, K., 1998. One Year After Federal Welfare Reform: A Description of State Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Decisions as of October 1997. Washington, DC: Urban Institute
6. Katz, B. and Carnevale, K., 1998, The State of Welfare Caseloads in America's Cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7. Lee, W., 1993, Restructuring the Local Welfare State: A Case Study of Los Angeles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Southern California.
8. Lee, W., 1997, Poverty and welfare dependency: The case of Los Angeles County in the 1980s. Environment and Planning A,. Vol. 29, 443-458.
9. Pack, J., 1998, Poverty and urban public expenditures. Urban Studies. Vol. 35, 1995-2019.
10. Pastor, M., Jr., Dreier, P., Grigsby, E., Lopez-Garza, M., 2000, Regions That Work: How Cities and Suburbs Can Grow Together. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Peck, J., 1998, Workfare in the sun: Politics, representation, and method in U.S. welfareto- work strategies. Political Geography. Vol. 17, 535-566.
12. Regenstein, M., Meyer, J. A., and Hicks, J. D., 1998. Job Prospects for Welfare Recipients: Employers Speak Out. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
13. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, 1998, Welfare Reform Impacts on the Public Housing Program: A Preliminary Assessment. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
14. Wolch, J., and Sommer, H., with the assistance of J. Handler and M. Stoner, 1997, Los Angeles in an Era of Welfare Reform: Implications for Poor People and Community Weil-Being. Los Angeles, CA: Southern California Inter-University Consortium on Homelessness and Poverty.
15. Wolch, J. and DeVerteuil, G., 2001, New landscape of urban poverty management. In N. Thrift and J. May, editors, TimeSpace. London, UK: Routledge.