Against endogeneity: The systemic preconditions of state formation

New Agendas in Statebuilding: Hybridity, Contingency and History

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 32-54

  Haldén, Peter ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906445028     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203073872     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. 'Systems-building before Statebuilding: On the Systemic Preconditions of Statebuilding', Conflict, Security and Development, 10:3, 2010.
2. Armstrong, A. and B. Rubin, 'The Great Lakes and South Central Asia', in Making States Work: State Failure and the Crisis of Governance, eds S. Chesterman, M. Ignatieff and R. C. Thakur, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2005.
3. Buzan, B. and O. Waever, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
4. Chandler, D., 'The Problems of Nation-Building Imposing Bureaucratic Rule from Above', Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17:3, 2004, pp. 577-591;
5. Orford, A., 'Jurisdiction without Territory From the Holy Roman Empire to the Responsibility to Protect', Michigan Journal of International Law, 30:3, 2009, pp. 981-1015.
6. Scott, W. R., and G. F. Davis, Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2006, pp. 117-120.
7. Locke, J., Second Treaties of Government, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Inc., 1980 [1764], p. 52 §95.
8. Skyrms, B. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
9. Watson, A., The Evolution of International Society, London: Routledge, 1992, p. 13.
10. Kaspersen, L. B. and N. Gabriel, 'The Importance of Survival Units for Norbert Elias's Figurational Perspective', The Sociological Review 56:3, 2008, pp. 370-387.
11. Jackson, P. T. and D. H. Nexon, 'Relations Before States: Substance, Process, and the Study of World Politics', European Journal of International Relations 5:3, 1999, pp. 291-332.
12. Elias, N., What Is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press, 1978, p. 14.
13. Elias, What Is Sociology?, p. 15.
14. Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Canada's International Policy Statement: The Role of Pride and Influence in the World, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Ottawa, Ontario, 2005, pp. ii, 1, 11, 13-15.
15. Finland, Finnish Security and Defence Policy, Government Report, Prime Minister's Office Publications, Helsinki: Helsinki University Print, 2009, pp. 19, 22, 26, 48, 75.
16. German Federal Ministry of Defence, German White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr, Federal Ministry of Defence, 2006, pp. 5, 14-15, 19, 25, 35, 48-49.
17. UK Cabinet Office, The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom: Security in an Interdependent World, London, 2008, pp. 3, 7, 13-14, 31, 33-41.
18. France, The French White Paper on Defence and National Security, 2008, Online. Available at: http://merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers/France_English2008.pdf (accessed 12 December 2009);
19. Italy, Il Concetto Strategico del Capo del SMD Stato Maggiore della Difesa, 2004, Online. Available at: http://merln.ndu.edu/white-papers.html (accessed 12 December 2009), p. 3;
20. The Netherlands, National Security Strategy and Work Programme 2007-2008, Broese & Peereboom, Breda, 2007, p. 18;
21. Norway, Relevant Force: Strategic Concept of the Norwegian Armed Forces, 2004, Online. Available at: www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Dokumenter/Rel-evant_force.pdf (accessed 12 December 2009), pp. 27-28;
22. Poland, National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland, Warsaw, 2007, p. 7.
23. United States of America, The White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, 2006, pp. 15, 44.
24. European Union, A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, 2003, pp. 6, 7.
25. UK, The National Security Strategy, p. 14;
26. Canada, Canada's International Policy Statement, p. 13;
27. Germany, German White Paper, p. 19;
28. European Union, A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, 2003, p. 4;
29. Australia, Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030, Australian Government Department of Defence, 2009. Online. Available at: www.apo.org.au/research/defending-australia-asia-pacific-century-force-2030 (accessed 12 December 2009), p. 15;
30. Norway, Relevant Force, p. 28;
31. Finland, Finnish Security and Defence, p. 19.
32. UK, The National Security Strategy, p. 14;
33. Canada, Canada's International Policy, p. 13;
34. Germany, German White Paper, p. 18;
35. Australia, Defending Australia, p. 15;
36. Norway, Relevant Force, p. 28;
37. Poland, National Security Strategy, p. 7;
38. Finland, Finnish Security and Defence, p. 26.
39. Germany, German White Paper, p. 18;
40. EU, A Secure Europe, pp. 4, 7.
41. UK, The National Security Strategy, p. 31;
42. Australia, Defending Australia, p. 18.
43. Canada, Canada's International Policy, p. 1;
44. Norway, Relevant Force, p. 28.
45. EU, A Secure Europe, p. 4;
46. US, The National Security Strategy, p. 15.
47. Bøås, M. and K. C. Dunn, 'African Guerrilla Politics: Raging Against the Machine?' in African Guerrillas: Raging Against the Machine, eds M. Bøås and K. C. Dunn, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2007, p. 19.
48. Herbst, J., States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
49. Clapham, C., Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
50. Jackson, R. H., Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
51. Poggi, G., The Development of the Modern State, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1978.
52. Tilly, C., ed., The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Press, 1975;
53. Tilly, C., Coercion, Capital and European States: AD 990-1992, Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
54. Tilly, The Formation.
55. Hintze, O., 'Wesen und Wandlung des modernen Staats', in Staat und Verfassung Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur allgemeinen Verfassungsgeschichte, Bd I, ed. G. Oestrich, Berlin: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970 [1931], pp. 470-496.
56. Herbst, States and Power.
57. Eriksen, S., 'The Congo War and the Prospects of State Formation: Rwanda and Uganda Compared', NUPI Working Paper No. 675, Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, 2005.
58. North, D. C., 'Transaction Cost Theory of Politics', Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2:355, 1990;
59. North, D. C., 'Institutions', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5:1, 1991, pp. 97-112;
60. North, D. C., W. Summerhill and B. R. Weingast, 'Order, Disorder and Economic Change: Latin America vs. North America', in Governing for Prosperity, eds B. Bueno de Mesquita and H. Root, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.
61. Link, C., 'Die Habsburgischen Erblände, Die Böhmischen Länder und Salzburg', in Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte Band I Vom Spätmittelalter bis zum Ende des Reiches, eds K. Jeserich, H. Pohl and G. von Unruh, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1983, p. 519.
62. North, D. C., The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1973;
63. Jones, E., The European Miracle: Environments, Economies and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
64. Spruyt, H., The Sovereign State and its Competitors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
65. Mitrany, D., The Functional Theory of Politics, London: Martin Robertson for the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1975.
66. Walker, R. B. J., Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
67. Reus-Smit, C., 'The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions', International Organization, 51:4, 1997, pp. 55-89.
68. Wendt, A., Social Theory of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 270.
69. Von Aretin, K. O., Das Altes Reich 1648-1806 Bd. 1 Föderalistische oder hierarchische Ordnung (1648-1684), Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1997, p. 160;
70. Wilson, P., The Holy Roman Empire 1495-1806, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999, p. 30.
71. Grześkowiak-Rwawicz, A., 'Anti-monarchism in Polish Republicanism in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries', in Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage, Vol. II, eds M. van Gelderen and Q. Skinner, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
72. Schroeder, P., The Transformation of European Politics 1763-1848, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
73. Watson, The Evolution of International Society;
74. Reus-Smit, 'The Constitutional Structure'.
75. Adler, E., 'Seeds of Peaceful Change: The OSCE's Security-community Building Model', in Security Communities, eds E. Adler and M. Barnett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 119, 122.
76. Deudney, D. H., 'Publius before Kant: Federal-Republican Security and Democratic Peace', European Journal of International Relations, 10:3, 2004, pp. 315-356.
77. Buzan and Waever, Regions and Powers, pp. 226-227.
78. Mann, M., The Sources of Social Power, Vol. II, The Rise of Classes and Nation-states, 1760-1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
79. Dobbins, J., ed., The UN's Role in Nation-Building: From the Congo to Iraq, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2005, pp. 32-33.
80. Bauer, G., 'Namibia in the First Decade of Independence: How Democratic?' Journal of Southern African Studies 27:1, 2001, pp. 34-35.
81. Parlevliet, M., 'Truth Commissions in Africa: The Non-Case of Namibia and the Emerging Case of Sierra Leone', International Law FORUM du droit international 2, 2000, pp. 100-101.
82. Lamb, G., 'Debasing Democracy: Security Forces and Human Rights Abuses in Post-Liberation Namibia and South Africa', in Measuring Democracy and Human Rights in Southern Africa, eds Y. D. Davids and H. Melber, Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, 2002.
83. Wendt, Social Theory, p. 165.
84. Haldén, P., Somalia: Failed State or Nascent States-System?, Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency, 2008.
85. Rubin, B. R., The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002, pp. 48-52.
86. Suhrke, A., When More is Less: Aiding Statebuilding in Afghanistan, Madrid: FRIDE Working Paper No. 26, 2006.
87. Egnell, R. and P. Haldén, 'Laudable, Ahistorical and Overambitious: Security Sector Reform Meets State Formation Theory', Conflict, Security and Development, 9:1, 2009, pp. 43-44.
88. Rashid, A., Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil, and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, London: Tauris, 2000, pp. 193-195.
89. Rubin, The Fragmentation of Afghanistan, pp. 62-64.
90. Rashid, Taliban, p. 185.
91. Rashid, A., Descent into Chaos: How the War Against Islamic Extremism is Being Lost in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia, London: Allen Lane, 2008, pp. 34-36.
92. Akbarzadeh, S., 'Keeping Central Asia Stable', Third World Quarterly, 4, 2004, pp. 699-703.
93. Browning, C. S. and P. Joenniemi, 'Geostrategies of the European Neighbourhood Policy', European Journal of International Relations, 14:3, 2008, pp. 519-555.
94. Rashid, Descent into Chaos, pp. 211-218;
95. Simonsen, S. G., 'Ethnicising Afghanistan?: Inclusion and Exclusion in Post-Bonn Institution Building', Third World Quarterly, 25:4, 2004, pp. 707-729.
96. Osiander, A., The States System of Europe, 1640-1990 Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
97. Teschke, B., The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations, London: Verso, 2003.
98. Rashid, Descent into Chaos, pp. 186-187;
99. Rubin, B. R., 'Afghanistan under the Taliban', Current History 98:625, 1999, p. 84.
100. Schroeder, P., 'The Lost Intermediaries: The Impact of 1870 on the International System', in Systems, Stability and Statecraft, ed. P. W Schroeder, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004.