Proficiency approaches for making more students college and career ready

The State of College Access and Completion: Improving College Success for Students from Underrepresented Groups

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 57-76

  Conley, David T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906438476     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203074091     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Achieve, The Education Trust, & Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. (2004). The American Diploma Project: Ready or not: Creating a high school diploma that counts. Washington, DC: Achieve.
2. ACT. (2005). College Readiness Standards. Iowa City, IA: Author.
3. ACT. (2011). The Condition of College & Career Readiness. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/readiness/2011
4. ACT. (2012). The Condition of College & Career Readiness. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr12/index.html
5. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
6. Adelman, C. (2006). The tool box revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
7. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., & Tahan, K. (2011). The condition of education 2011. (Report No. NCES 2011-033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
8. Bailey, T. (2009). Challenge and opportunity: Rethinking the role and function of developmental education in community college. New Directions for Community Colleges, 145, 11-30.
9. Bailey, T., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S.-W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29 (2), 255-270.
10. Belfield, C. R., & Crosta, P. M. (2012). Predicting success in college: The importance of placement tests and high school transcripts. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
11. Block, J. H. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
12. Block, J. H. (1980). Promoting excellence through mastery. Theory into Practice, 19 (1), 66-74.
13. Bloom, B. (1971). Mastery learning. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
14. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2010). Crossing the finish line. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: U.S. National Academy of Sciences' National Academies Press.
16. California State University System. (2006). Early assessment program. Retrieved from http://www.calstate.edu/eap/
17. California State University System. (2009). Fall 2009 regularly admitted first-time freshmen remediation systemwide. Retrieved from http://www.asd.calstate.edu/remediation/09/Rem_Sys_fall2009.htm
18. Case, R. E. (2008). Independent learning and test question development: The intersection of student and content. Assessment Update: Progress, Trends, and Practices in Higher Education, 20 (1), 5-7.
19. College Board. (2006). Standards for college success. New York, NY: Author.
20. College Board. (2012). Mean SAT scores of college-bound seniors, 1972-2011. Retrieved from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/data-reports-research/sat/cb-seniors-2011/tables
21. Conley, D. (1996a). Daddy, I'm scared: A prophetic parable. Phi Delta Kappan, 78 (4), 290-297.
22. Conley, D. (1996b). Where's Waldo? The conspicuous absence of higher education from school reform and one state's response. Phi Delta Kappan, 78 (4), 309-314.
23. Conley, D. (1998, April). Early research on proficiency-based college admissions: The cases of Oregon and Wisconsin. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
24. Conley, D. (1999). Statewide strategies for implementing competency-based admissions standards. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers & ACT.
25. Conley, D. (2000, April). Who is proficient: The relationship between proficiency scores and grades. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
26. Conley, D. (2002, January-February). Proficiency-based admissions. Paper presented at the College Board Invitational Conference, Washington, DC.
27. Conley, D. (2003). Understanding university success. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy Research.
28. Conley, D. (2004). Proficiency-based admissions. In W. J. Camara & E. W. Kimmel (Eds.), Choosing students: Higher education tools for the 21st century (pp. 313-330). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Conley, D. (2005). College knowledge: What it really takes for students to succeed and what we can do to get them ready. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30. Conley, D. (2010). College and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Conley, D. (2012). A complete definition of college and career readiness. Eugene, OR: Education Improvement Policy Center. Retrieved from http://epiconline.org/publications/index.dot
32. Conley, D., Aspengren, K., Gallagher, K., & Langan, H. (2006). College Board Curriculum Study in Science. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
33. Conley, D., Aspengren, K., Gallagher, K., & Nies, K. (2006, April). College Board validity study for math. Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
34. Conley, D., Aspengren, K., & Stout, O. (2006). Advanced Placement best practices study: Biology, chemistry, environmental science, physics, European history, US history, world history. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
35. Conley, D., Aspengren, K., Stout, O., & Veach, D. (2006). College Board Advanced Placement best practices course study report. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
36. Conley, D., Drummond, K.V., DeGonzalez, A., Rooseboom, J., & Stout, O. (2011). Reaching the goal: The applicability and importance of the common core state standards to college and career readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
37. Conley, D., McGaughy, C., Brown, D., van der Valk, A., & Young, B. (2009). Texas career and technical education career pathways analysis study. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
38. Conley, D., McGaughy, C., Cadigan, K., Flynn, K., Forbes, J., & Veach, D. (2008). Texas college readiness initiative phase II: Examining the alignment between the Texas college and career readiness standards and entry-level courses at Texas postsecondary institutions. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
39. Conley, D., McGaughy, C., Cadigan, K., Flynn, K., Forbes, J., & Veach, D. (2009). Alignment of the Texas college and career readiness standards with entry-level general education courses at Texas postsecondary institutions. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
40. Council of Chief State School Officers, & National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELAStandards.pdf
41. Dietz, S. (2011). State high school tests: Changes in state policies and the impact of the college and career readiness movement. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
42. Farrington, C.A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T.S., Johnson, D.W., & Beechum, N.O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
43. Garb, F. (1998). University of Wisconsin competency based admissions pilot project spring 1998: Final report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin System.
44. Gewertz, C. (2012). N.H. schools focus on competency. Education Week, 31 (20), 1-16.
45. Gonczi, A., & Hager, P. (2010). The competency model. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Vol. 8 (pp. 403-410). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
46. Guskey, T. R. (1980a). Mastery learning: Applying the theory. Theory into Practice, 19 (2), 104-111.
47. Guskey, T. R. (1980b). What is mastery learning? And why do educators have such hopes for it? Instructor, 90 (3), 80-82, 84, 86.
48. Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.
49. Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates. (2002). Academic literacy: A statement of competencies expected of students entering California's public colleges and universities. Sacramento: Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates of the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California.
50. Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates. (2010). Statement on competencies in mathematics expected of entering college students. Sacramento: Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates of the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California.
51. Kober, N., & Rentner, D. S. (2012). Year two of implementing the common core state standards: States' progress and challenges. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=391
52. Kurlaender, M., Howell, J., & Salvetti, J. (2008). Postsecondary preparation and remediation: Examining the effects of the Early Assessment Program at California State University. Davis: School of Education, University of California, Davis.
53. Mendenhall, R. W. (2012). Western Governors University. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers: Education and information technologies (pp. 115-132). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE.
54. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2012). 2008 long-term trend top stories. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/ltt_2008/
55. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Condition of education 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
56. National Governors Association & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Common core state standards initiative: In the states. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/in-the-states
57. National Research Council. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. high schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
58. Nicastro, G., & Moreton, K. M. (2008). Development of quality performance tasks at Western Governors University. Assessment Update: Progress, Trends, and Practices in Higher Education, 20 (1), 8-9.
59. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1994). What do student grades mean? Differences across schools (Education Research Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
60. Olson, L. (2002). A "proficient" score depends on geography. Education Week, 21 (23), 1-15.
61. Oregon Department of Education. (2011). Proficiency-based teaching and learning in Oregon: An evolution from state policy to practice. Salem, OR: Author.
62. Oregon University System. (2001). An introduction to the Proficiency-based Admission Standards System (PASS). Eugene: Oregon University System.
63. Oregon University System. (2003). Aligning public university admission with K-12 student learning. Eugene, OR: Office of Academic Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.ous.edu/sites/default/files/state_board/jbac/files/Aligning-w-K-12.pdf
64. Partnership for Readiness for College and Careers. (2012). Home. Retrieved from http://www.parcconline.org/
65. Russell, A. B. (1998). Statewide college admissions, student preparation, and remediation policies and programs. Boulder, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
66. Sherman, J. C., & Scrima, D. P. (1997, March). Competency-based admissions standards in Washington: A status report. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
67. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. (2012). Home. Retrieved from http://www.smarterbalanced.org/
68. Soares, L. (2012). A "disruptive" look at competency-based education: How the innovative use of technology will transform the college experience. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
69. Tell, C. A., & McDonald, D. (2003, November). The first year: Students' performance on 10th grade standards and subsequent performance in the first year of college (2001-02). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, OR.
70. Texas Education Agency. (2012). STAAR resources. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/.
71. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board & Educational Policy Improvement Center. (2009). Texas College and Career Readiness Standards. Austin, TX: Authors.
72. University of Nebraska. (1993). University of Nebraska subject matter competencies: Preparation of students for admission to the university (Working paper). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
73. University System of Georgia. (2002, June). PACTS: Performance Assessment for Colleges and Technical Schools. Retrieved from http://www.usg.edu/p16/pacts/
74. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Defining and assessing learning: Exploring competency-based initiative (Report No. NCES 2002-159). Prepared by E. A. Jones and R. A. Voorhees, with K. Paulson, for the Council of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group on Competency-Based Initiatives. Washington, DC: Author.
75. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
76. Venezia, A., Callan, P.M., Kirst, M.W., & Usdan, M. D. (2006). The governance divide: The case study for Georgia. San Jose, CA: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
77. Venezia, A., Kirst, M., & Antonio, A. (2004). Betraying the college dream: How disconnected K-12 and postsecondary systems undermine student aspirations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
78. Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don't students like school: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
79. Zane, T. W. (2008). Domain definition: The foundation of competency assessment. Assessment Update: Progress, Trends, and Practices in Higher Education, 20 (1), 3-4.
80. Ziomek, R. L., & Svec, J. C. (1995). High school grades and achievement: Evidence of grade inflation. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.