Invisibility and Interpretation

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue AUG, 2014, Pages

  Herzog, Michael H ^a   Hermens, Frouke ^b   Öǧmen, Haluk ^c  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Consciousness; Masking; Priming; Visibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906347825     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Albrecht, T., Klapötke, S., &Mattler, U. (2010). Individual differences in metacontrast masking are enhanced by perceptual learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 656-666.
2. Aydin, M., Herzog, M. H., &Öǧmen., H. (2011). Attention modulates spatio-temporal grouping. Vision Research, 51(4), 435-446.
3. Bachmann, T. (1994). Psychophysiology of visual masking: The fine structure of conscious experience. Breitmeyer
4. B., &Öǧmen., H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision (Vol. 41). Oxford University Press.
5. Breitmeyer, B. G., Herzog, M. H., &Öǧmen, H. (2008). Motion, not masking, provides the medium for feature attribution. Psychological Science, 19(8), 823-829.
6. Breitmeyer, B. G., &Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception &Psychophysics, 62(8), 1572-1595.
7. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., &Riviere, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4(7), 752-758.
8. Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(1), 75.
9. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(4), 481.
10. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (2002). Object substitution without reentry? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 594-596.
11. Efron, R. (1967). The duration of the present. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 138(2), 713-729.
12. Efron, R. (1973). Conservation of temporal information by perceptual systems. Perception &Psychophysics, 14(3), 518-530.
13. Eimer, M., &Schlaghecken, F. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological psychology, 64(1), 7-26.
14. Enns, J. T. (2002). Visual binding in the standing wave illusion. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 9(3), 489-496.
15. Enns, J. T., &Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8(2), 135-139.
16. Enns, J. T., &Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 345-352.
17. Fehrer, E., &Raab, D. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 143.
18. Francis, G., &Hermens, F. (2002). Comment on" competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes"(di lollo, enns &rensink, 2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 590-593.
19. Ghose, T., Hermens, F., &Herzog,M. (2013). Howthe global layout of themask influencesmasking strength. Journal of Vision, 13(9), 826-826.
20. Grainger, J. E., Scharnowski, F., Schmidt, T., &Herzog, M. H. (2013). Two primes priming: Does feature integration occur before response activation? Journal of Vision, 13(8), 19.
21. Hermens, F., Scharnowski, F., &Herzog, M. H. (2009). Spatial grouping determines temporal integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 595.
22. Hermens, F., Scharnowski, F., &Herzog, M. H. (2010). Automatic grouping of regular structures. Journal of Vision, 10(8).
23. Herzog, M. H. (2007). Spatial processing and visual backward masking. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3(1), 85-92.
24. Herzog,M. H., &Fahle,M. (2002). Effects of grouping in contextual modulation. Nature, 415(6870), 433-436.
25. Herzog, M. H., &Koch, C. (2001). Seeing properties of an invisible object: Feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(7), 4271-4275.
26. Herzog, M. H., Parish, L., Koch, C., &Fahle, M. (2003). Fusion of competing features is not serial. Vision research, 43(18), 1951-1960.
27. Hofer, D., Walder, F., &Gronër, M. (1989). Metakontrast: Ein berühmtes, aber schwer messbares phänomen. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Anwendungen, 48(4), 219-232.
28. Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70(6p1), 404.
29. Klotz, W., &Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 976.
30. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace. Lamme, V. A., &Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(11), 571-579.
31. Lleras, A., &Moore, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 106.
32. Moore, C. M., &Lleras, A. (2005). On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1171.
33. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., &Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconsciousmasked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13(5), 416-424.
34. Nishida, S., Watanabe, J., &Kuriki, I. (2005). Motion-induced colour segregation. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 279-279.
35. Noory, B., Herzog, M. H., &Öǧmen., H. (under review). Retinotopy of visual masking and nonretinotopic perception during masking. Attention, Perception, &Psychophysics.
36. Öǧmen., H. (2007). A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3(1-2), 67.
37. Öǧmen., H., Breitmeyer, B. G., &Melvin, R. (2003). The what and where in visual masking. Vision Research, 43(12), 1337-1350.
38. Ogmen, H., &Herzog, M. H. (2010). The geometry of visual perception: Retinotopic and nonretinotopic representations in the human visual system. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(3), 479-492.
39. Öǧmen, H., Otto, T. U., &Herzog, M. H. (2006). Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision. Vision Research, 46(19), 3234-3242.
40. Otto, T. U., Öǧmen., H., &Herzog, M. H. (2006). The flight path of the phoenix: The visible trace of invisible elements in human vision. Journal of Vision, 6(10).
41. Otto, T. U., Öǧmen., H., &Herzog,M. H. (2008). Assessing the microstructure of motion correspondences with non-retinotopic feature attribution. Journal of Vision, 8(7).
42. Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A., &Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4(7), 739-744.
43. Pilling, M., &Gellatly, A. (2010). Object substitution masking and the object updating hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 17(5), 737-742.
44. Pilz, K. S., Zimmermann, C., Scholz, J., &Herzog, M. H. (2013). Long-lasting visual integration of form, motion, and color as revealed by visual masking. Journal of Vision, 13(10).
45. Roelfsema, P. R., &Houtkamp, R. (2011). Incremental grouping of image elements in vision. Attention, Perception, &Psychophysics, 73(8), 2542-2572.
46. Rubin, E. (1915). Visuell wahrgenommene figuren. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel. Scharnowski, F., Hermens, F., &Herzog, M. H. (2007). Bloch's law and the dynamics of feature fusion. Vision Research, 47(18), 2444-2452.
47. Scharnowski, F., Hermens, F., Kammer, T., Öǧmen., H., &Herzog, M. H. (2007). Feature fusion reveals slow and fast visual memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 632-641.
48. Scharnowski, F., Rüter, J., Jolij, J., Hermens, F., Kammer, T., &Herzog, M. H. (2009). Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Vision, 9(6).
49. Scheerer, E. (1973). Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking. Psychologische Forschung, 36(1), 71-93.
50. Schiller, P. H., &Smith, M. C. (1966). Detection in metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 32.
51. Schmidt, T. (2002). The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychological Science, 13(2), 112-118.
52. Sharikadze, M., Fahle, M., &Herzog, M. H. (2005). Attention and feature integration in the feature inheritance effect. Vision Research, 45(20), 2608-2619.
53. Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261-267.
54. Stewart, A. L., &Purcell, D. G. (1970). U-shaped masking functions in visual backward masking: Effects of target configuration and retinal position. Perception &Psychophysics, 7(4), 253-256.
55. Ternus, J. (1938). The problem of phenomenal identity. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner &Company. Turvey,M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences froman informationprocessing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80(1), 1.
56. Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., &Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(10), 6275-6280.
57. Wannig, A., Stanisor, L., &Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Automatic spread of attentional response modulation along gestalt criteria in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 14(10), 1243- 1244.
58. Werner, H. (1935). Studies on contour: I. qualitative analyses. The American Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 40-64.
59. Wilson, A. E., &Johnson, R.M. (1985). Transposition in backwardmasking the case of the travelling gap. Vision Research, 25(2), 283-288.