Safety approach for composite pressure vessels for road transport of hydrogen. Part 1: Acceptable probability of failure and hydrogen mass

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 39, Issue 26, 2014, Pages 14132-14141

  Lasn, Kaspar ^a   Echtermeyer, Andreas T ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Acceptable probability of failure; Composite pressure vessel; Hydrogen mass

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; PRESSURE VESSELS; PROBABILITY; SAFETY FACTOR;

ACCEPTABLE PROBABILITY; ANNUAL PROBABILITIES; COMPOSITE PRESSURE VESSELS; CURRENT ENERGY; HYDROGEN INFRASTRUCTURE; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; ROAD TRANSPORTS; STORAGE SYSTEMS;

HYDROGEN STORAGE;

EID: 84906317678     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.116     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. J.-P. Antoniotti Impact of high capacity CGH2-trailers Public Deliverable 6.4 in EU research project DeliverHy 2013 www.deliverhy.eu
2. International Standard ISO 11119-3:2013(E) Gas cylinders - refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes. Part 3: fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 L with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners 2013 ISO
3. International Standard ISO 11515:2013(E) Gas cylinders - refillable composite reinforced tubes of water capacity between 450 L and 3000 L - design, construction and testing 2013 ISO
4. G.W. Mair, and M. Hoffmann Regulations and research on RC&S for hydrogen storage relevant to transport and vehicle issues with special focus on composite containments Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 11 2014 6132 6145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.141
5. DNV Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C501 Composite components October 2010 Det Norske Veritas https://exchange.dnv.com
6. International Standard ISO 2394:1998(E) General principles on reliability for structures 1998 ISO
7. European Standard EN 1990:2002(E) Eurocode - basis of structural design 2002 CEN
8. B. Bhattacharya, R. Basu, and K-t Ma Developing target reliability for novel structures: the case of the mobile offshore base Mar Struct 14 2001 37 58
9. F. De Florio Airworthiness: an introduction to aircraft certification 2nd ed. 2011 Elsevier Ltd. Butterworth-Heinemann
10. DNV Classification Notes No 30.6 Structural reliability analysis of marine structures July 1992 Det Norske Veritas Classification AS https://exchange.dnv.com
11. W. Duckett Risk analysis and the acceptable probability of failure Struct Eng 2 August 2005 25 26 Available from: http://www.istructe.org/iabse/files/ henderson04/paper-06.pdf [accessed Dec 2013]
12. S. Mannan Chapter 26 - case histories. Lees' process safety essentials. Hazard identification, assessment and control 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Butterworth-Heinemann 482 483
13. E. Planas-Cuchi, N. Gasulla, A. Ventosa, and J. Casal Explosion of a road tanker containing liquified natural gas J Loss Prev Process Ind 17 2004 315 321
14. S. Brambilla, and D. Manca The viareggio LPG railway accident: event reconstruction and modeling J Hazard Mater 182 2010 346 357
15. P. Kumar Fire disaster following LPG tanker explosion at chala in Kannur (Kerala, India): August 27, 2012 Burns 39 2013 1479 1487
16. S.W. Jorgensen Hydrogen storage tanks for vehicles: recent progress and current status Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 15 2011 39 43
17. G. Landucci, A. Tugnoli, and V. Cozzani Safety assessment of envisaged systems for automotive hydrogen supply and utilization Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 1493 1505
18. L. Sjöberg, and T. Thedéen Reflections on risks and technology G. Grimvall, Å.J. Holmgren, P. Jacobsson, T. Thedéen, Risks in technological systems 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited
19. J.K. Vrijling, W. Van Hengel, and R.J. Houben A framework for risk evaluation J Hazard Mater 43 1995 245 261
20. S.G. Reid Chapter 7 - acceptable risk D. Blockley, Engineering safety 1992 McGraw-Hill International Ltd
21. C.B. Goh, C.B. Ching, and R. Tan Risk analysis for the road transportation of hazardous chemicals in Singapore - a methodology J Loss Prev Process Ind 8 1 1995 35 39
22. G. Spadoni, P. Leonelli, P. Verlicchi, and R. Fiore A numerical procedure for assessing risks from road transport of dangerous substances J Loss Prev Process Ind 8 4 1995 245 252
23. U.K. Chakrabarti, and J.K. Parikh A societal risk study for transportation of class-3 hazmats - a case of Indian state highways Process Saf Environ Prot 91 2013 275 284
24. D.J. Ball, and P.J. Floyd Societal risks 1998 Final Report. Available from: http://www.rpaltd.co.uk/documents/J198-SocietalRisk.pdf
25. A.W. Evans Transport fatal accidents and FN-curves: 1967-2001 2003 HSE Research Report 073. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr073. pdf Crown copyright
26. H.J. Pasman, and W.J. Rogers Safety challenges in view of the upcoming hydrogen economy: an overview J Loss Prev Process Ind 23 2010 697 704
27. H.J. Pasman Challenges to improve confidence level of risk assessment of hydrogen technologies Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 2407 2413
28. M. Moonis, A.J. Wilday, and M.J. Wardman Semi-quantitative risk assessment of commercial scale supply chain of hydrogen fuel and implications for industry and society Process Saf Environ Prot 88 2010 97 108
29. M. Groethe, E. Merilo, J. Colton, S. Chiba, Y. Sato, and H. Iwabuchi Large-scale hydrogen deflagrations and detonations Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 2125 2133
30. T. Tanaka, T. Azuma, J.A. Evans, P.M. Cronin, D.M. Johnson, and R.P. Cleaver Experimental study on hydrogen explosions in a full-scale hydrogen filling station model Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 2162 2170
31. M. Royle, and D. Willoughby The safety of the future hydrogen economy Process Saf Environ Prot 89 2011 452 462
32. A.G. Venetsanos, E. Papanikolaou, and J.G. Bartzis The ADREA-HF CFD code for consequence assessment of hydrogen applications Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 3908 3918
33. W.G. Houf, G.H. Evans, E. Merilo, M. Groethe, and S.C. James Releases from hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles in tunnels Int J Hydrogen Energy 37 2012 715 719
34. D.M. Johnson The potential for vapour cloud explosions - lessons from the buncefield accident J Loss Prev Process Ind 23 2010 921 927
35. W. Breitung Part II, Ch. 9. Safety analysis of hydrogen vehicles and infrastructure A. Léon, Hydrogen technology. Mobile and portable applications 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidleberg
36. J. LaChance, A. Tchouvelev, and A. Engebo Development of uniform harm criteria for use in quantitative risk analysis of the hydrogen infrastructure Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 2381 2388
37. S.B. Dorofeev Evaluation of safety distances related to unconfined hydrogen explosions Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 2118 2124
38. L.I. Zhiyong, P.A.N. Xiangmin, and M.A. Jianxin Harm effect distances evaluation of severe accidents for gaseous hydrogen refueling station Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 1515 1521
39. 2 Int J Hydrogen Energy 31 2006 1780 1790
40. O.A. Rosyid, D. Jablonski, and U. Hauptmanns Risk analysis for the infrastructure of a hydrogen economy Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 3194 3200
41. Y.-D. Jo, and B.J. Ahn Analysis of hazard area associated with hydrogen gas transmission pipelines Int J Hydrogen Energy 31 2006 2122 2130
42. Failure rate and event data for use within risk assessments 2012 HSE [accessed Jan 2013] www.hse.gov.uk/landuseplanning/failure-rates.pdf
43. Report No. 434-9 Land transport accident statistics OGP risk assessment data directory March 2010 [accessed Jan 2014] www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/434-09.pdf
44. Echtermeyer AT, Lasn K. Safety approach for composite pressure vessels for road transport of hydrogen. Part 2: safety factors and test requirements. Accepted to Int J of Hydrogen Energy.