Analysis of hazard area associated with hydrogen gas transmission pipelines

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 31, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 2122-2130

  Jo, Young Do ^a   Ahn, Bum Jong ^b  

^a Korea Gas Safety Corporation   (South Korea)

^b Korea Polytechnic University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hazard analysis; Hazard area; Hydrogen gas pipeline; Release rate; Thermal radiation

Indexed keywords

FIRES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HAZARDS; HEAT RADIATION; HYDROGEN; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

HAZARD ANALYSIS; HAZARD AREA; HYDROGEN GAS PIPELINES; RELEASE RATE;

GAS PIPELINES;

EID: 33748587281     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Goltsov V.A., and Veziroglu T.N. A step on the road to hydrogen civilization. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002) 719-723
2. Shinnar R. The hydrogen economy, fuel cells, and electric cars. Technol Soc 25 (2003) 455-476
3. United State Department of Energy. National hydrogen energy roadmap, 2002.
4. Papadakis G.A. Major hazard pipeline: a comparative study of onshore transmission accident. J Loss Prev Process Ind 12 (1999) 91-107
5. Townsend NA, Fearnehough GD. Control of risk from UK gas transmission pipelines. Presented at the seventh symposium on line pipe research, October. Houston: AGA; 1986.
6. Steven R.E., and John A.M. Safety recommendations for liquid and gas bulk hydrogen systems. Profess Saf 35 7 (1990) 32-38
7. Jo Y.D., and Ahn B.J. A simple model for the release rate of hazardous gas from a hole on high pressure pipeline. J Hazard Mater 97 1-3 (2003) 31-46
8. Jo Y.D., and Ahn B.J. Analysis of hazard area associated with high pressure natural gas pipeline. J Loss Prev Process Ind 15 (2002) 179-188
9. Bragaw CG. Rapid crack propagation in MDPE. In: Proceedings of the seventh symposium on plastic fuel gas pipe, November. New Orleans, US: American Gas Association; 1979. p. J1-31.
10. Hill RT, Catmur JR. Risks from hazardous pipelines in the United Kingdom. Health and Safety Executive Contract Research report no 82/1994.
11. TNO Green Book. Methods for the determination of possible damage. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: TNO; 1989 [chapter 1].
12. AIChE/CCPS. Guideline for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. The Center for Chemical Process Safety of American Institute of Chemical Engineers; 1988, ISBN 0-8169-0402-2.
13. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Safety standard for Hydrogen and hydrogen systems: guideline for hydrogen system design, materials selection, operations, storage, and transportation. Washington: Office of Safety and Mission Assurance; 1997. p. 2-21.
14. Venetsanos A.G., Huld T., Adams P., and Bartzis J.G. Source, dispersion and combustion modeling of an accidental release of hydrogen in an urban environment. J Hazard Mater A105 (2003) 1-25
15. AIChE/CCPS. Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of vapor cloud explosions, flash fire, and BLEVEs. The Center for Chemical Process Safety of American Institute of Chemical Engineers; 1994, ISBN 0-8169-0474-X.
16. Crowl D.A., and Louvar J.F. Chemical process safety fundamentals with applications. 2nd ed (2002), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
17. API RP 521. Recommended practice 521. 3rd ed (1990), API, Washington, DC November
18. Rausch AH, Eisenberg NA, Lynch CJ. Continuing development of the vulnerability model (VM2). Report no CG-53-77, February, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard, Washington, DC, 1977.
19. Ogle R.A. Explosion hazard analysis for and enclosure partially filled with a flammable gas. Process Saf Prog 18 (1999) 170
20. Jo YD, Park KS. Minimum amount of flammable gas for explosion with confined space. Process Saf Prog 2004, in press.
21. IGE. Steel pipeline for high pressure gas transmission. Recommendations on transmission and distribution practice IGE/TD/1 edition 3 (communication 1530) (1993), The Institution of Gas Engineers, London, UK