Supervised machine learning and active learning in classification of radiology reports

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 893-901

  Nguyen, Dung H M ^a   Patrick, Jon D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER REGISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ACTIVE LEARNING; CLASSIFICATION; MACHINE LEARNING; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84906313707     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002516     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Thomas BJ, Ouellette H, Halpern EF, et al. Automated computer-assisted categorization of radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:687-90.
2. Dreyer KJ, Kalra MK, Maher MM, et al. Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: validation study. Radiology 2005;234:323-9.
3. McCowan IA, Moore DC. Collection of cancer stage data by classifying free-text medical reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;17:736-45.
4. Cheng L, Zheng J, Savova G, et al. Discerning tumor status from unstructured mri reports: completeness of information in existing reports and utility of automated natural language processing. J Digit Imaging 2010;23:119-32.
5. Settles B. Active learning literature survey. Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2009.
6. Ertekin S, Huang J, Bottou L, et al. Learning on the border: active learning in imbalanced data classification. Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2007:127-36.
7. Baram Y, El-Yaniv R, Luz K. Online choice of active learning algorithms. J Mach Learn Res 2004;5:255-91.
8. Osugi T, Kun D, Scott S. Balancing exploration and exploitation: a new algorithm for active machine learning. Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2005:330-7.
9. Schohn G, Cohn D. Less is more: active learning with support vector machines. Machine Learning-International Workshop then Conference. 2000:839-46.
10. Tong S, Koller D. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J Mach Learn Res 2002;2:45-66.
11. Campbell C, Cristianini N, Smola A, et al. Query learning with large margin classifiers. Machine Learning-International Workshop then Conference. 2000:111-18.
12. Roy N, McCallum A. Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '01. San Francisco, CA, USA, 2001:441-8.
13. Hochbaum DS, Shmoys DB. A best possible heuristic for the k-center problem. Math Operations Res 1985;10:180-4.
14. Chen Y, Cao H, Mei M, et al. Applying active learning to supervised word sense disambiguation in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:1001-6.
15. Chen Y, Carroll RJ, Hinz ERM, et al. Applying active learning to high-throughput phenotyping algorithms for electronic health records data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:253-9.
16. Figueroa RL, Zeng-Treitler Q, Ngo LH, et al. Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:809-16.
17. Sohn S, Kim W, Comeau DC, et al. Optimal training sets for Bayesian prediction of MeSH® assignment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:546-53.
18. Patrick J, Nguyen HMD. Automated proof reading of clinical notes. Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 25). Singapore, Singapore, 2011:303-12.
19. Lafferty JD, McCallum A, Pereira FCN. Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '01. San Francisco, CA, USA, 2001:282-9.
20. Joachims T. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. Machine learning: ECML-98. 1998:137-42.
21. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). U.S National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/ (accessed Mar 2013).
22. Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT). http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/ (accessed March 2013).
23. CRF++. Yet another CRF toolkit. Software available at: http://crfpp.sourceforge.net/ (accessed Mar 2013).
24. Hsu CC, Chang CW, Lin CJ. A practical guide to support vector classification. Technical report, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University 2003-2010.
25. Fan RE, Chang KW, Hsieh CJ, et al. Liblinear: a library for large linear classification. J Mach Learn Res 2008;9:1871-4.
26. Nguyen D, Patrick J. Reverse active learning for optimising information extraction training production. In: Michael Thielscher, Dongmo Zhang, eds. AI 2012: advances in artificial intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012:445-56.
27. Kang J, Ryu KR, Kwon HC. Using cluster-based sampling to select initial training set for active learning in text classification. In: Honghua Dai, Ramakrishnan Srikant, Chengqi Zhang, eds. Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004:384-8.