Initial experience with the glidesheath slender for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: A feasibility study with prospective radial ultrasound follow-up

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 436-442

  Aminian, Adel ^a   Dolatabadi, Dariouch ^a   Lefebvre, Pascal ^a   Zimmerman, Robert ^a   Brunner, Philippe ^a   Michalakis, Georges ^a   Lalmand, Jacques ^a  

^a Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi   (Belgium)

Author keywords

radial occlusion; radial sheath; transradial access; transradial approach

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CATHETER SHEATH; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GUIDING CATHETER; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR SHEATH KINKING; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY OCCLUSION; TRANSRADIAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASOSPASM; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; DEVICES; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART CATHETERIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84906303365     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25232     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemelä M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR,; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): A randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-1420.
2. Cantor WJ, Mahaffey KW, Huang Z, Das P, Gulba DC, Glezer S, Gallo R, Ducas J, Cohen M, Antman EM, Langer A, Kleiman NS, White HD, Chisholm RJ, Harrington RA, Ferguson JJ, Califf RM, Goodman SG,. Bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early invasive management can be reduced with radial access, smaller sheath sizes, and timely sheath removal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 73-83.
3. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR,. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-140.
4. Wiper A, Kumar S, MacDonald J, Roberts DH,. Day case transradial coronary angioplasty: A four-year single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 549-553.
5. Bertrand OF, De Larochellière R, Rodés-Cabau J, Proulx G, Gleeton O, Nguyen CM, Déry JP, Barbeau G, Noël B, Larose E, Poirier P, Roy L,. A randomized study comparing same-day home discharge and abciximab bolus only to overnight hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion after transradial coronary stent implantation. Circulation 2006; 114: 2636-2643.
6. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Džavík V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S,. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2490-2499.
7. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Borghi A, Di Russo C, Moretti C, Agostoni P, Loschiavo P, Lioy E, Sheiban I, Sangiorgi G,. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2481-2489.
8. Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, Jolly SS, Rode's-Cabau J, Larose E, Costerousse O, Hamon M, Mann T,. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: Results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1022-1031.
9. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, Kim JY, Lee SH, Hwang SO, Choe KH,. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: Arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol 2005; 101: 421-427.
10. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S,. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 46: 173-178.
11. Mamas M, D'Souza S, Hendry C, Ali R, Iles-Smith H, Palmer K, El-Omar M, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Neyses L, Fraser DG,. Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: A feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 596-602.
12. Pancholy SB, Sanghvi KA, Patel TM,. Radial artery access technique evaluation trial: Randomized comparison of Seldinger versus modified Seldinger technique for arterial access for transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 80: 288-291.
13. Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, Subherwal SS, Feldman DN, Garratt KN, Curtis JP, Messenger JC, Rao SV,. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 420-426.
14. Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, Baklanov DV, Kim LK, Wong SC, Minutello RM, Messenger JC, Moussa I, Garratt KN, Piana RN, Hillegass WB, Cohen MG, Gilchrist IC, Rao SV,. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation 2013; 127: 2295-2306.
15. Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Hong KP, Park JE, Seo JD,. A 5fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6fr approach: A prospective randomized study. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19: 141-147.
16. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Völzke H, Felix SB,. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 172-176.
17. Uhlemann M, Möbius-Winkler S, Mende M, Eitel I, Fuernau G, Sandri M, Adams V, Thiele H, Linke A, Schuler G, Gielen S,. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2012; 5: 36-43.
18. Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M, Hakeem A, Mills JD, Palmer ND, Perry RA, Morris JL,. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2010; 3: 475-483.
19. Bernat I, Bertrand OF, Rokyta R, et al. Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 1698-1701.
20. Abdelaal E, Molin P, Plourde G, Machaalany J, Bataille Y, Brousseau-Provencher C, Montminy S, Larose E, Roy L, Gleeton O, Barbeau G, Nguyen CM, Noël B, Costerousse O, Bertrand OF,. Successive transradial access for coronary procedures: experience of Quebec Heart-Lung Institute. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 325-331.
21. Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M,. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): A randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 335-340.
22. Cubero JM, Lombardo J, Pedrosa C, et al. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 467-472.