A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: A prospective randomized study

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 141-147

  Gwon, Hyeon Cheol ^a,b   Doh, Jun Hyung ^a   Choi, Jin Ho ^a   Lee, Sang Hoon ^a   Hong, Kyung Pyo ^a   Park, Jung Euy ^a   Seo, Jung Don ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Samsung Medical Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5FRENCH CATHETER; 6FRENCH CATHETER; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; CATHETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL ARTERY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRANSRADIAL CORONARY INTERVENTION; WOUND COMPLICATION;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645506868     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00121.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kiemeneij F Laarman GJ Transradial artery coronary angioplasty Am Heart J 1995 129 1 8
2. Kiemeneij F Laarman GJ Odekerken D et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The ACCESS study J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 29 1269 1275
3. Schobel WA Spyridopoulos I Hoffmeister HM et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions using a new 5-French guiding catheter: Results of a prospective study Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001 53 308 312
4. Domingo E Lupon-Roses J Angel J et al. Five French versus eight French catheters and the Judkins technique. Advantages and limitations for studying coronary artery disease Int J Card Imaging 1988 3 61 65
5. Arora P Naik N Bahl VK et al. Coronary angiography using 4 French catheters with power injection: A randomized comparison with 6-French catheters Indian Heart J 2002 54 184 188
6. Gobeil F Lefevre T Louvard Y et al. Coronary angioplasty using 5-French guiding catheters: Preliminary experience Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000 51 107 109
7. Schussler JM Smith R Schreibfeder M et al. Five French (5 Fr) guiding catheters for percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stent placement: An initial feasibility study Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000 51 352 357
8. Garcia E Moreno R Gomez-Recio M Successful stent delivery through 5-French guiding catheter J Invasive Cardiol 2001 13 16 18
9. Ormiston JA Dixon B Webster MW et al. 5-French guide catheters for percutaneous coronary intervention: A feasibility study in 100 consecutive patients Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001 52 45 48
10. Rakhit RD Matter C Windecker S et al. Five French versus 6-French PCI: A case control study of efficacy, safety and outcome J Invasive Cardiol 2002 14 670 674
11. Dahm JB D Hummel A et al. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6-French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 57 172 176
12. Von Sohsten R Oz R Marone G et al. Deep intubation of 6-French guiding catheters for transradial coronary interventions J Invasive Cardiol 1998 10 198 202
13. Saito S Ikei H Hosokawa G et al. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999 46 173 178