Introduction: Learning with technology

Collaborative Learning, Reasoning, and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-14

  O'Donnell, Angela M ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906267838     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203826843     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Agnew, C. (2001). Evaluating changes in teaching and learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25, 293–298.
2. American Psychological Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Retrieved December 19, 2004 from http://www.apa.org/ed/lcp.html
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Chinn, C. A., O’Donnell, A. M., & Jinks, T. S. (2001). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77-97.
5. Day, R., Shirey, W., Ramakrishnan, S., & Huang, Q. (1998, April). Tumor biology modeling workbench for prospectively evaluating cancer treatments. Paper presented at the 2 nd IMACS International Multiconference: CESA ’98 Computational Engineering in Systems Applications, Tunisia.
6. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.
7. Gumport, P. J., & Chun, M. (2000). Technology and higher education: Opportunities and challenges for the new era (Tech. Rep. No.1-02). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
8. Honey, M. (2001). Testimony before the Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee, United States Senate, July 25, 2001. Retrieved 12/19/2004 from http://main.edc.org/newsroom/features/mhtestimony.asp
9. Jones, T. H., & Paolucci, R. (1999). Research framework and dimensions for evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology systems on learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 17–28.
10. Kerrey, R., & Isakson, J. (2000). The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice (Report of the Web-Based Education Commission). Retrieved December 19, 2004 from http://www.ed.gov/offices/AC/WBEC/FinalReport/WBECReport. pdf.
11. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C., & Cohen, P. (1980). Effectiveness of computerbased teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525–544.
12. Merisotis, J. P. (1999). The "What's-the-difference?" debate. Academe, 85(5), 47–51.
13. Norris, C., Smolka, J, & Soloway, E. (2000). Extracting value from research: A guide for the perplexed. Technology & Learning, 20(11), 45-48.
14. Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 15-27.
15. O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive per spectives on peer learning (pp. 179–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. O’Donnell, A. M., & O’Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321–349.
17. Pea, R., Edelson, D., & Gomez, L. (1994, April). The CoVis Collaboratory: High school science learning supported by a broadband educational network with scientific visualization, videoconferencing, and collaborative computing. Paper presented at the symposium Issues in Computer Networking in K-12 Classrooms: A Progress Report of Four NSF Testbeds, at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
18. Person, N. K. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies may inhibit effective tutoring. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 161–188.
19. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. P. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Retrieved from http:/www.ihep.com/difference.pdf
20. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89–99.
21. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.
22. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.
23. Schwartz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 219-256.
24. Tinker, B., & Berenfeld, B. (1994). Patterns of US Global Lab adaptations. Hands on! Retrieved from http://hou.lbl.gov.
25. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.