Research framework and dimensions for evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology systems on learning outcomes

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 17-27

  Jones, Trevor H ^a   Paolucci, Rocco ^b,c  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Cabrini University   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational technology; Effectiveness; Evaluation; Instructional systems; Learning outcomes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992813743     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1999.10782266     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman & Green.
2. Branson, R. K. (1997). The Florida school Year 2000 initiative: Redesigning public education. Educational Technology, 37(6), 14-23.
3. Charp, S. (1998). Measuring the effectiveness of educational technology. T.H.E. Journal, 25(7), 6.
4. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
5. Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
6. Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain. New York: David McKay Co.
7. Hedberg, J., Brown, C. & Arrighi, M., (1997). Interactive multimedia and Web-based learning: Similarities and differences. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 47-58). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
8. Jonassen, D. H., & Hannum, W. H. (1995). Analysis of task analysis procedures. In G. H. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp- 197-209). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
9. Jones, T., & Paolucci, R. (1997, April). Putting educational technology in perspective:: The question of learning effectiveness. In J. Willis, J. Price, S. McNeil, B. Robin, & D. Willis (Eds.), Technology and teacher education annual, 1997(pp. 881-884). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
10. Katz, E., Tate, R. G., & Weimer, W. (1995) Survey of telematics for education and training: Vol. 2, United States [Online document]. European Association of Distance Teaching Universities, 1995. Available: Http:l/194.70.69.3/ethos/survey/vol2/techsch.htm
11. Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S.M. (1994). Designing effective instruction. New York: Merrill.
12. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
13. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co.
14. McKenzie, J. (1995). Did anybody learn anything? From Now On [Online serial], 5(4). Available: Http://fromnowon.org/fnodec95.htmL
15. Paolucci, R. (1998). The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 123-150.
16. Recker, M. (1997). Appropriate use of educational technologies: A layered approach. Educational Technology Review, 7, 9-12.
17. Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1996). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers(2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18. Romiszowski, A.J. (1997). Web-based distance learning and teaching: Revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction(pp. 25-37). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
19. Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
20. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T.J. (1993). Instructional design. New York: Merrill/Macmillan Publishing.