Mathematical modeling of tumor growth and treatment

Current Pharmaceutical Design

Volumn 20, Issue 30, 2014, Pages 4934-4940

  Enderling, Heiko ^a,c   Chaplain, Mark A J ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiogenesis; Ordinary differential equation; Partial differential equation; Tumor modeling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR CELL; TUMOR GROWTH; TUMOR VOLUME; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL DIVISION; NEOPLASMS; PATHOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS CONCERNING THE ENTIRE ORGANISM; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER THERAPY; COMPUTER MODEL;

CELL DIVISION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84906217098     PISSN: 13816128     EISSN: 18734286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1381612819666131125150434     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Wang CH, Rockhill JK, Mrugala M, et al. Prognostic significance of growth kinetics in newly diagnosed glioblastomas revealed by combining serial imaging with a novel biomathematical model. Cancer Res 2009; 69(23): 9133-9140.
2. Macklin P, Edgerton ME, Thompson AM, Cristini V. Patient-calibrated agent-based modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): from microscopic measurements to macroscopic predictions of clinical progression. J Theoretical Biol 2012; 301: 122-140.
3. Gao X, McDonald JT, Hlatky L, Enderling H. Acute and fractionated irradiation differentially modulate glioma stem cell division kinetics. Cancer Res 2013; 73(5): 1481-1490.
4. Rockne R, Rockhill JK, Mrugala M, et al. Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55(12): 3271-3285.
5. Enderling H, Chaplain MAJ, Anderson ARA, Vaidya JS. A mathematical model of breast cancer development, local treatment and recurrence. J Theoretical Biol 2007; 246(2): 245-259.
6. Cappuccio A. Cancer immunotherapy by interleukin-21: potential treatment strategies evaluated in a mathematical model. Cancer Res 2006; 66(14): 7293-7300.
7. Marcu L, Bezak E. Radiobiological modeling of interplay between accelerated repopulation and altered fractionation schedules in head and neck cancer. J Med Phys 2009; 34(4): 206.
8. Powathil GG, Gordon KE, Hill LA, Chaplain MAJ. Modelling the effects of cell-cycle heterogeneity on the response of a solid tumour to chemotherapy Biological insights from a hybrid multiscale cellular automaton model. J Theoretical Biol Elsevier; 2012; 308(C): 1-19.
9. Holmgren L, O'Reilly MS, Folkman J. Dormancy of micrometastases: Balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angio-genesis suppression. Nature Med 1995; 1(2): 149-153.
10. Enderling H. Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Dormancy. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2012. pp. 55-71.
11. Skehan P. On the normality of growth dynamics of neoplasms in vivo: a data base analysis. Growth 1986; 50(4): 496-515.
12. Prehn RT. The inhibition of tumor growth by tumor mass. Cancer Res 1991; 51(1): 2-4.
13. Hart D, Shochat E, Agur Z. The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data. Br J Cancer 1998; 78(3): 382-387.
14. Norton L. Cancer stem cells, self-seeding, and decremented exponential growth: theoretical and clinical implications. Breast Dis. IOS Press 2008; 29(1): 27-36.
15. Sachs RK, Hlatky LR, Hahnfeldt P. Simple ODE models of tumor growth and anti-angiogenic or radiation treatment. Mathematical Computer Modelling Elsevier 2001; 33(12): 1297-1305.
16. McAneney H, O'Rourke SFC. Investigation of various growth mechanisms of solid tumour growth within the linear-quadratic model for radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52(4): 1039-1054.
17. Gompertz B. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical transactions Royal Soc London 1825; 115: 513-583.
18. Winsor CP. The Gompertz curve as a growth curve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1932; 18(1): 1-8.
19. Spratt JS, Meyer JS, Spratt JA. Rates of growth of human solid neoplasms: Part I. J Surg Oncol 1995; 60(2): 137-146.
20. Spratt JS, Meyer JS, Spratt JA. Rates of growth of human neoplasms: Part II. J Surg Oncol 1996; 61(1): 68-83.
21. Hahnfeldt P, Panigrahy D, Folkman J, Hlatky L. Tumor development under angiogenic signaling: a dynamical theory of tumor growth, treatment response, and postvascular dormancy. Cancer Res 1999; 59(19): 4770-4775.
22. Gatenby RA, Gawlinski ET. A reaction-diffusion model of cancer invasion. Cancer Res 1996; 56(24): 5745-5753.
23. Gatenby RA. The potential role of transformation-induced metabolic changes in tumor-host interaction. Cancer Res 1995; 55(18): 4151-4156.
24. Perumpanani AJ, Sherratt JA, Norbury J, Byrne HM. Biological inferences from a mathematical model for malignant invasion. Invasion Metastasis 1996; 16(4-5): 209-221.
25. Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ, Newman EL, et al. Mathematical modelling of tumour invasion and metastasis. Computational Mathematical Methods Med 2000; 2(2): 129-154.
26. Anderson ARA. A hybrid mathematical model of solid tumour invasion: the importance of cell adhesion. Mathematical Med Biol 2005; 22(2): 163-186.
27. Chaplain MAJ, Lolas G. Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: the role of the urokinase plasminogen activation system. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 2005; 15(11): 1685-1734.
28. Andasari V, Gerisch A, Lolas G, et al. Mathematical modeling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: biological insight from mathematical analysis and computational simulation. J Math Biol 2010; 63(1): 141-171.
29. Frieboes HB. An integrated computational/experimental model of tumor invasion. Cancer Res 2006; 66(3): 1597-604.
30. Gerisch A, Chaplain MAJ. Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: Local and non-local models and the effect of adhesion. J Theoretical Biology 2008; 250(4): 684-704.
31. Chaplain MAJ, Ganesh M, Graham IG. Spatio-temporal pattern formation on spherical surfaces: numerical simulation and application to solid tumour growth. J Math Biol Springer-Verlag 2001; 42(5): 387-423.
32. Turner S, Sherratt JA. Intercellular adhesion and cancer invasion: a discrete simulation using the extended Potts model. J Theoretical Biol 2002; 216(1): 85-100.
33. Poplawski NJ, Agero U, Gens JS, et al. Front instabilities and invasiveness of simulated avascular tumors. Bull Math Biol 2009; 71(5): 1189-1227.
34. Kansal AR, Torquato S, Harsh GR IV, et al. Cellular automaton of idealized brain tumor growth dynamics. BioSystems 2000; 55(1-3): 119-127.
35. Zhang L, Wang Z, Sagotsky JA, Deisboeck TS. Multiscale agent-based cancer modeling. J Math Biol 2008; 58(4-5): 545-559.
36. Enderling H, Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ, et al. Paradoxical dependencies of tumor dormancy and progression on basic cell kinetics. Cancer Res 2009; 69(22): 8814-8821.
37. Rejniak KA, Anderson ARA. Hybrid models of tumor growth. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2010; 3(1): 115-125.
38. Ramis-Conde I, Chaplain MAJ, Anderson ARA. Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue. Mathematical Computer Model 2008; 47(5-6): 533-545.
39. Ramis-Conde I, Drasdo D, Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ. Modeling the Influence of the E-Cadherin-P-Catenin Pathway in Cancer Cell Invasion: A Multiscale Approach. Biophys J 2008; 95(1): 155-165.
40. McCarthy JB, Palm SL, Furcht LT. Migration by haptotaxis of a Schwann cell tumor line to the basement membrane glycoprotein laminin. The J Cell Biol 1983; 97(3): 772-777.
41. Davis JM, John JS, Cheung HT. Haptotactic activity of fibronectin on lymphocyte migration in vitro. Cellular Immunol 1990; 129(1): 67-79.
42. Macklin P, McDougall S, Anderson ARA, et al. Multiscale modelling and nonlinear simulation of vascular tumour growth. J Math Biol 2008; 58(4-5): 765-798.
43. McDougall SR, Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ. Mathematical modelling of dynamic adaptive tumour-induced angiogenesis: Clinical implications and therapeutic targeting strategies. J Theoretical Biol 2006; 241(3): 564-589.
44. Alarcón T, Owen MR, Byrne HM, Maini PK. Multiscale modelling of tumour growth and therapy: the influence of vessel normalisation on chemotherapy. Computational Mathematical Methods Med 2006; 7(2-3): 85-119.
45. Bauer AL, Jackson TL, Jiang Y. A cell-based model exhibiting branching and anastomosis during tumor-induced angiogenesis. Biophysical J Elsevier; 2007; 92(9): 3105-3121.
46. Jackson T, Zheng X. A cell-based model of endothelial cell migration, proliferation and maturation during corneal angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 2010; 72(4): 830-868.
47. Owen MR, Alarcón T, Maini PK, Byrne HM. Angiogenesis and vascular remodelling in normal and cancerous tissues. J Math Biol 2008; 58(4-5): 689-721.
48. Szczerba D, Kurz H, Szekely G. A computational model of intus-susceptive microvascular growth and remodeling. J Theoretical Biol Elsevier; 2009; 261(4): 570-583.
49. Bentley K, Gerhardt H, Bates PA. Agent-based simulation of notch-mediated tip cell selection in angiogenic sprout initialisation. J Theoretical Biol 2008; 250(1): 25-36.
50. Welter M, Bartha K, Rieger H. Vascular remodelling of an arterio-venous blood vessel network during solid tumour growth. J Theoretical Biol 2009; 259(3): 405-422.
51. Wu J, Long Q, Xu S, Padhani AR. Study of tumor blood perfusion and its variation due to vascular normalization by anti-angiogenic therapy based on 3D angiogenic microvasculature. J Biomech 2009; 42(6): 712-721.
52. Anderson AR, Chaplain MA. Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 1998; 60(5): 857-899.
53. McDougall S, Dallon J, Sherratt J, Maini P. Fibroblast migration and collagen deposition during dermal wound healing: mathematical modelling and clinical implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Phys Eng Sci 2006; 364(1843): 1385-1405.
54. Machado CB, De Albuquerque Pereira WC, Talmant M, et al. Computational evaluation of the compositional factors in fracture healing affecting ultrasound axial transmission measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2010; 36(8): 1314-1326.
55. Watson MG, McDougall SR, Chaplain MAJ, et al. Dynamics of angiogenesis during murine retinal development: a coupled in vivo and in silico study. J Royal Soc Interface 2012; 9(74): 2351-2364.
56. Araujo RA, McElwain DLS. A history of the study of solid tumour growth: the contribution of mathematical modelling. Bull Math Biol 2004; 66(5): 1039-1091.
57. Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ, Rejniak KA. Single-cell-based models in biology and medicine. Birkhäuser Basel, Boston, Berlin, 2007.
58. Lowengrub JS, Frieboes HB, Jin F, et al. Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours. Nonlinearity 2009; 23(1): R1-R91.
59. Deisboeck TS, Stamatakos GS. Multiscale cancer modeling. CRC Press; 2011.