Do disgusting and fearful anti-smoking advertisements increase or decrease support for tobacco control policies?

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 744-747

  Halkjelsvik, Torleif ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERTIZING; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISGUST; EMOTIONALITY; FEAR; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING BAN; SMOKING CESSATION; VIDEORECORDING; ADOLESCENT; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; MIDDLE AGED; POLICY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; AGED; FEAR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK-TAKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84906066613     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: 18734758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.021     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Blake K.D., Viswanath K., Blendon R.J., Vallone D. The role of reported tobacco-specific media exposure on adult attitudes towards proposed policies to limit the portrayal of smoking in movies. Tobacco Control 2010, 19(3):191-196. 10.1136/tc.2009.031260.
2. Blake K.D., Viswanath K., Blendon R.J., Vallone D. The role of tobacco-specific media exposure, knowledge, and smoking status on selected attitudes toward tobacco control. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2010, 12(2):117-126. 10.1093/ntr/ntp184.
3. Burstein P. The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly 2003, 56(1):29-40. 10.1177/106591290305600103.
4. Casler K., Bickel L., Hackett E. Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior 2013, 29(6):2156-2160. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009.
5. Diepeveen S., Ling T., Suhrcke M., Roland M., Marteau T. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health 2013, 13(1):1-11. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-756.
6. Doucet J.M., Velicer W.F., Laforge R.G. Demographic differences in support for smoking policy interventions. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32(1):148-157.
7. Farrelly M.C., Duke J.C., Davis K.C., Nonnemaker J.M., Kamyab K., Willett J.G., et al. Promotion of smoking cessation with emotional and/or graphic antismoking advertising. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012, 43(5):475-482.
8. Goodman J.K., Cryder C.E., Cheema A. Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2013, 26(3):213-224. 10.1002/bdm.1753.
9. Hamilton W.L., Biener L., Rodger C.N. Who supports tobacco excise taxes? Factors associated with towns' and individuals' support in Massachusetts. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2005, 11(4):333-340.
10. Hayes A.F. An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach 2013, Guilford Press, New York.
11. Holden C.J., Dennie T., Hicks A.D. Assessing the reliability of the M5-120 on Amazon's mechanical Turk. Computers in Human Behavior 2013, 29(4):1749-1754. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.020.
12. Macy J.T., Chassin L., Presson C.C. Smoking behaviors and attitudes during adolescence prospectively predict support for tobacco control policies in adulthood. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2012, 14(7):871-879. 10.1093/ntr/ntr301.
13. Macy J.T., Chassin L., Presson C.C. The association between implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking and support for tobacco control measures. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2013, 15(1):291-296.
14. Peters G.-J.Y., Ruiter R.A.C., Kok G. Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review 2012, 1-24. 10.1080/17437199.2012.703527.
15. Schumann A., John U., Thyrian J.R., Ulbricht S., Hapke U., Meyer C. Attitudes towards smoking policies and tobacco control measures in relation to smoking status and smoking behaviour. European Journal of Public Health 2006, 16(5):513-519.
16. Smith K.C., Siebel C., Pham L., Cho J., Singer R.F., Chaloupka F.J., et al. News on tobacco and public attitudes toward smokefree air policies in the United States. Health Policy 2008, 86(1):42-52. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.015.
17. Velicer W.F., Laforge R.G., Levesque D.A., Fava J.L. The development and initial validation of the smoking policy inventory. Tobacco Control 1994, 3(4):347.
18. Wakefield M.A., Bayly M., Durkin S., Cotter T., Mullin S., Warne C. Smokers' responses to television advertisements about the serious harms of tobacco use: Pre-testing results from 10 low- to middle-income countries. Tobacco Control 2013, 22(1):24-31. for the International Anti-Tobacco Advertisement Rating Study Team. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050171.
19. Wakefield M.A., Spittal M., Yong H., Durkin S., Borland R. Effects of mass media campaign exposure intensity and durability on quit attempts in a population-based cohort study. Health Education Research 2011, 26(6):988-997.
20. World Health Organization WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2013: Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising promotion and sponsorship. Appendix X 2011, World Health Organization, Geneva.
21. World Lung Foundation Mass media communications campaigns 2013, Retrieved from http://www.worldlungfoundation.org/ht/d/sp/i/6510/pid/6510.